Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Neo4j AuraDB Logo

Neo4j AuraDB Reviews

Vendor: Neo4j
4.4 out of 5

What is Neo4j AuraDB?

Featured Neo4j AuraDB reviews

Neo4j AuraDB mindshare

As of September 2025, the mindshare of Neo4j AuraDB in the Managed NoSQL Databases category stands at 5.1%, down from 5.2% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Managed NoSQL Databases Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Neo4j AuraDB5.1%
Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB16.3%
Amazon DynamoDB13.6%
Other65.0%
Managed NoSQL Databases

PeerResearch reports based on Neo4j AuraDB reviews

TypeTitleDate
CategoryManaged NoSQL DatabasesSep 14, 2025Download
ProductReviews, tips, and advice from real usersSep 14, 2025Download
ComparisonNeo4j AuraDB vs Microsoft Azure Cosmos DBSep 14, 2025Download
ComparisonNeo4j AuraDB vs Amazon DynamoDBSep 14, 2025Download
ComparisonNeo4j AuraDB vs Amazon DocumentDBSep 14, 2025Download
Suggested products
TitleRatingMindshareRecommending
Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB4.116.3%95%102 interviewsAdd to research
MongoDB Atlas4.29.7%96%49 interviewsAdd to research
 
 
Key learnings from peers

Valuable Features

Room for Improvement

Pricing

Popular Use Cases

Service and Support

Deployment

Scalability

Stability

Top industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
32%
Educational Organization
11%
Financial Services Firm
8%
Healthcare Company
6%
Construction Company
6%
University
5%
Comms Service Provider
4%
Retailer
3%
Non Profit
3%
Government
3%
Manufacturing Company
2%
Logistics Company
2%
Pharma/Biotech Company
2%
Wireless Company
1%
Hospitality Company
1%
Media Company
1%
Museum Or Institution
1%
Performing Arts
1%
Real Estate/Law Firm
1%
Recreational Facilities/Services Company
1%
Renewables & Environment Company
1%
Transportation Company
1%
Venture Capital & Private Equity Firm
1%
Wholesaler/Distributor
1%

Compare Neo4j AuraDB with alternative products

Learn more about Neo4j AuraDB

Related questions

 
Neo4j AuraDB Reviews Summary
Author infoRatingReview Summary
Founder at data25.0I've used Neo4j AuraDB for three years to solve water optimization issues in oil and gas, appreciating its speed, tooling, and integration options, though I wish it had a built-in graph viewer like Retool.
Founder & Creator at RRADD Strategy4.5Neo4j AuraDB is a cloud-based graph database ideal for scalable projects with minimal maintenance. Its professional version supports growing needs, though it has a steep learning curve. Improving the Bloom interface and development ease would enhance its usability for larger datasets.
Data Scientist - L1 at a consultancy with 51-200 employees4.5I find Neo4j AuraDB to be an efficient graph database, ideal for relationship-centric modeling and AI-enhanced analysis. It's fast, affordable, and works well across major clouds. Documentation could improve, but overall, it's effective for my projects.
Full Stack Engineer at Freelance4.5I used Neo4j AuraDB to store data from Hacker News because it was free and supported multiple languages. While connecting it to various apps was easy, stability issues occurred. The intuitive community and resources were significant advantages for me.
PHD Scholar at Indian Institute of Technology, Jodhpur4.0As a research scholar, I've found Neo4j AuraDB invaluable for my cipher language research. Integrating it with Python for visualization is straightforward, and it also supports other languages like Java. The platform meets my needs without requiring improvements.
Student at University of São Paulo5.0I utilized Neo4j AuraDB to connect and visualize data, leveraging its flexible model and excellent performance. Its AWS hosting ensures reliability. While graph visualization could be improved, its powerful graph database and community support greatly enhance data analysis efficiency.
retired at Infocz3.5Neo4j AuraDB is convenient for our team, allowing easy access and integration with modules like LangChain and LLM. However, the setup process faced stability issues due to network disconnections, highlighting the need for improvements in the tool's reliability.