Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

What is Axonius?

Get the report
Helped 866,324 peers since 2012

Featured Axonius reviews

Axonius mindshare

Product category:
As of September 2025, the mindshare of Axonius in the Cyber Asset Attack Surface Management (CAASM) category stands at 32.7%, down from 38.2% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Cyber Asset Attack Surface Management (CAASM) Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Axonius32.7%
Armis22.7%
Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management10.6%
Other34.0%
Cyber Asset Attack Surface Management (CAASM)

PeerResearch reports based on Axonius reviews

TypeTitleDate
CategoryCyber Asset Attack Surface Management (CAASM)Sep 1, 2025Download
ProductReviews, tips, and advice from real usersSep 1, 2025Download
ComparisonAxonius vs ArmisSep 1, 2025Download
ComparisonAxonius vs Qualys CyberSecurity Asset ManagementSep 1, 2025Download
Suggested products
TitleRatingMindshareRecommending
Armis4.322.7%90%10 interviewsAdd to research
Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management4.610.6%100%23 interviewsAdd to research
 
 
Key learnings from peers

Valuable Features

Room for Improvement

ROI

Pricing

Popular Use Cases

Service and Support

Deployment

Scalability

Stability

Review data by company size

By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business2
Midsize Enterprise2
Large Enterprise3
By reviewers
By visitors reading reviews
Company SizeCount
Small Business126
Midsize Enterprise103
Large Enterprise379
By visitors reading reviews

Top industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
12%
Government
9%
Computer Software Company
9%
University
8%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Healthcare Company
5%
Retailer
5%
Energy/Utilities Company
5%
Insurance Company
4%
Educational Organization
3%
Media Company
3%
Real Estate/Law Firm
3%
Pharma/Biotech Company
2%
Comms Service Provider
2%
Construction Company
2%
Outsourcing Company
2%
Museum Or Institution
2%
Legal Firm
2%
Hospitality Company
2%
Performing Arts
2%
Aerospace/Defense Firm
2%
Wholesaler/Distributor
1%
Non Profit
1%
Consumer Goods Company
1%
Recreational Facilities/Services Company
1%
Marketing Services Firm
1%
 
Axonius Reviews Summary
Author infoRatingReview Summary
Security Operations Engineer at Nitro4.0We use Axonius for noncompliance reporting and as a CMDB, benefiting from its agentless API integration and customizable dashboards, though improvement is needed in compliance features. While it offers unique capabilities, evaluating existing solutions is essential.
Sr. Systems Engineer at a tech services company with 11-50 employees5.0In my company, we evaluated Axonius for identifying unmanaged endpoints. The tool is user-friendly compared to others like Splunk, though it sometimes confuses duplicate assets. It's versatile for security and asset management, with continuous improvements.
Information Security Business Enablement Mgr. at a insurance company with 5,001-10,000 employees4.0Axonius is a powerful tool for IT asset management and cybersecurity, connecting disparate data sources to identify gaps in asset inventories and improve security posture. Its automation and query features, alongside responsive support, enhance operational efficiency without additional costs.
Systems Engineer at a tech services company with 11-50 employees4.0I find Axonius highly effective for cybersecurity asset management, offering visibility into network assets and identifying obsolete systems and security vulnerabilities. However, it needs more vendor integrations and AI capabilities to remain competitive and comprehensive in asset management.
Sr. IT Automation Technical Consultant at IBM4.0I use Axonius to connect IT systems, leveraging its ability to deduplicate records and integrate with ServiceNow. It simplifies identifying device usage and deviations. However, it could benefit from supporting more ticketing platforms and enhanced API integration.
Cross Platform Development/Solutions Architect at Kornit Digital4.0I use Axonius primarily for collecting background data and identifying cybersecurity issues. Its user-friendly interface enhances business processes. However, I believe providing more detailed feature descriptions or YouTube tutorials could further improve the user experience.
IT Security System Administrator I at Mouser Electronics4.5We use Axonius for asset monitoring by tagging assets through AD groups for regional tracking. Its eCheck feature is valuable for pinpointing issues, but accurate reporting requires user cooperation with query customization due to some limitations.