How do you or your organization use this solution?
Please share with us so that your peers can learn from your experiences.
Thank you!
I am using it for software assurance focused on security. I am using its latest version.
We use it for code scanning and security testing for our in-house application development. We are using its latest version.
We are using Checkmarx for application code scanning, such as scanning for different leverages in the application code.
Checkmarx is used only for static application security testing (SAST), and it can integrate very well with DAST solutions. So both of them are combined into an integrated solution for customers running application security.
We use the solution for scanning the code for security.
We're selling their licenses and their technologies. We have on-premises and cloud deployments. Its deployment depends on the customer requirements. It is used for a range of requirements for DevSecOps. It has been deployed to ensure that the development cycle delivers clean and secure code that is vulnerability-free. It is there as a part of the whole compliance and security process.
We are using multiple solutions for application security, and Checkmarx is one of them. We are a client-centric organization, and we are also providing support to clients for application security. Sometimes, we have our own production, and then we scan the customer information and provide application security. For a few clients, it is deployed on the cloud, and for a few customers, it is on-premises.
We're more evaluating the solution rather than using it right now. We're resellers and it's something we'd like to offer to our clients.
We use Checkmarx for security vulnerability identification. We are using its latest version. We have a license to upgrade to the latest version. Whenever there is a new version, we update it to the latest version.
We onboard clients with the solution. We install the product and do the first scan with them. We help developers with security and the best practices with their applications with this solution.
We primarily use Checkmarx for application security and tracking.
I am in charge of application security and Checkmarx is one of the products that I use in this capacity. We use this product for code scanning and static code analysis.
We use Checkmarx for static analysis as part of our software development lifecycle. It is very important because it helps us identify the security flaws in the code at a very early stage. Ultimately, this helps in reducing costs.
I am the founder and the chairman of an internationally certified cybersecurity research lab. I have a Ph.D. in cryptology and network security. We are a strategic partner of Checkmarx. Our job is to help them develop solutions. Currently, we are developing some algorithms and strategic solutions for them. Checkmarx informs us about what is happening, in advance, before they launch a product. We are also one of their testers.
When I had an issue that was causing trouble in my code, I would upload it to Checkmarx to perform static code analysis. I would then study the reports.
We use Checkmarx for scanning our source code.
We use this solution to check our systems for any vulnerabilities in our applications. Currently, I'm working on a banking tool, which is aligned with the menu. Our system was created 30 years ago and still is running in the market and doing well. However, currently, there are so many changes happening. Any solution coming into the technology needs to have a security check to ensure everything is safe.
The primary use case is for a white-box penetration testing security. When we work with source code, it's a tool to help us conduct a deep analysis on a source code level. We push the zip file with source code to our own stent with the solution and receive a report. Also, we work with the interface to find the vulnerabilities we may have. The most popular projects for us are the mobile application security assessment. We propose this option to our customers to check source code for iOS and Android mobile applications.
We are using it for static security scanning and static security testing. We also use it for code dependency analysis. We use two of the solution's tools for each variable.
The primary use that we have for Checkmarx is the evaluation of source code vulnerabilities. We use Git to connect to Checkmarx. We don't use GitHub. We use our own self-hosted Git. We're just using generic Git. One of the biggest thorns in our side is managing that aspect of it. It wouldn't matter if it was GitHub or Bitbucket or any of the other tools that you can use to connect Git to Checkmarx. The issue is the same. The tool is good at telling us what repository we're connected to, but it is horrible in telling us what branch we're connected to.
Our primary use case for this solution is SAST, Static Application Security Testing.
My team uses this product extensively for application vulnerability assessment. This solution is for static application security testing and is used within our software development process. As the software developers are creating solutions, they are able to identify vulnerabilities while the application is being written, rather than after the entire development is over. We were interested in having the raw source code scanned, so that was the primary requirement and that is where Checkmarx comes in. We do not need any precompiled libraries, or compiled source code, to be checked by the source code analysis solution. We have a security team that uses this product to scan source code, rather than have the developers handle it. We do not have any developer licenses (i.e. the SDLC Edition). Instead, the security team identifies the vulnerabilities and shares the report with the development team.
We use Checkmarx to review the source code for the external applications that we expose to the cloud or other servers on the internet.
Code scan. We performed periodic static code scans on copies of our Git repository to identify possible vulnerabilities.
Please share with the community what you think needs improvement with Checkmarx.
What are its weaknesses? What would you like to see changed in a future version?
Let the community know what you think. Share your opinions now!