Leandro Cruz - PeerSpot reviewer
Arquiteto de Soluções at Brasilprev
  • 2
  • 311

What are the functional differences between Camunda BPM and IBM BPM?

Hello community, 

I'm interested in replacing IBM BPM with Camunda BPM but I cannot find the functional differences between these tools. Can anyone help?

PeerSpot user
3 Answers
Piotr Mazur - PeerSpot reviewer
Digital Transformation Solution Manager at Altkom Software & Consutling
Real User
Top 5
Feb 15, 2021

Hi Leandro,

those two BPM's shouldn't be compared on the functional level. They are different type of solutions. 

Camunda offers the workflow engine and decission engine, where you can create process models according to BPMN and DMM standards. This gives you the flexibility and agility in the process management. It also gives you the tools to monitor, manage and optimize those processes.

Camunda provides very limited functionalities, if it comes to end user interfaces. Usually they are built as custom applications or existing application are used. With Camunda projects you always focus on automation, that requires system integration and custom development and usually concerns core business processes.

Camunda is an openAPI solution, which makes the integration fast and easy. It is a common situation in financial industry, that you have many systems, that need to be integrated in one process, that is why Camunda is so popular in this sector.

Before you decide on the switch, you have to consider the processes you want to use it for. If this is for standard processes like holiday requests, invoice approvals etc. Camunda is not the best option. But if you want to automate sales or after sales processes, client/partner onboarding, claims management, debt collection you should definitely consider Camunda.

I found once in Camunda documents an interesting comparison between Camunda and BPM suites:

"On a blank canvas, an artist can paint a picture in exactly the way he imagines. Alternatively, there is the principle of “painting by numbers”, where even the artistic layman can create stunning images by coloring in predetermined areas. However, they can only create what was already pre-designed."

And finally, Camunda is available as open source solution and there is no vendor lock.

I hope it helped ;-) There is always an option to have a talk...



Product comparison that may be of interest to you
Catalin Paunescu - PeerSpot reviewer
Aug 24, 2021

You could have a look also on jBPM / jBPM based solutions (as an alternative to Camunda). 

Camunda has limited capabilities in the community version. In the case of jBPM, the same capability set is provided in both the community and enterprise versions (the only difference is that with the enterprise version you pay for support).

If you are looking for the jBPM engine combined with content services in one unified platform/user experience, you could have a look at SEAL (https://star-storage.ro/product/seal-online/).

Managing Partner at Envision Consultants Ltd
Feb 13, 2021

Me too

Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda Platform vs. IBM BPM and other solutions. Updated: November 2022.
655,774 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Related Questions
Netanya Carmi - PeerSpot reviewer
Content Manager at PeerSpot (formerly IT Central Station)
Nov 7, 2021
See 1 answer
Nov 7, 2021
Camunda Platform allows for visual demonstration and presentation of business process flows. The flexible Java-based option was a big win for us and allows for the integration of microservices very quickly. Camunda Platform is very stable, with a free open-source version that is very good. The automation is great. Camunda Platform can be challenging regarding the initial setup, though, and it seems to take a long time for completed workflows to be implemented. The learning curve for this Camunda Platform can be pretty steep. A mobile app would be a welcome enhancement. Process interfaces between diagrams could be improved and better template options would be welcomed. Apache Airflow integrates well with other pipelines and solutions. We like the direct support we get from Python using Apache Airflow. This makes work and automation much easier. Apache Airflow handles complex workflows and coordination of tasks easily. We can use it to manage large-scale data processing workloads using DAG, which is a core component of Apache Airflow. Using Apache Airflow is okay, but managing it has its challenges. We would expect better scaling, especially since it is on the cloud. Apache Airflow is also not a great solution for those who are not tech-savvy. (It is not for business-end users.) Conclusion: Both of these solutions require some level of technical expertise to implement and manage, which is something to keep in mind. We felt Apache Airflow offered better integration with the solutions we are currently using. We have a solid relationship currently with Python and are using many solutions that make Apache Airflow the best choice for us.
Netanya Carmi - PeerSpot reviewer
Content Manager at PeerSpot (formerly IT Central Station)
Nov 8, 2021
Which would you choose and why?
See 1 answer
Dovid Gelber - PeerSpot reviewer
Tech blogger
Nov 8, 2021
Pega BPM allows for a great deal of flexibility in terms of how an organization or company can set up this solution. There are two possible ways that this product can be deployed. Each of these has a different level of setup difficulty. The first option involves a completely cloud-based approach, linking the program up to the cloud and connecting it to your organization’s online databases. At that point, most of the work is being done by the program and the cloud itself. Option two is more difficult to implement. This option involves installing the software on your company’s local servers. This requires a great amount of work to properly integrate the software with the local hardware. You will want to hire experts in this type of technology to run the integration and manage the software. Camunda Platform is relatively easy to set up if you are not attempting to tweak the software to gain extra functions out of it. It can be downloaded and deployed within a half an hour. However, if your organization wants to get more out of the program than its most basic functions, the process becomes more complicated. Additional time and resources will be required if your company wants to add things onto the software. Pega BPM has a variety of payment models. They offer options that scale their prices based on the number of users or the number of cases that the organization has. These are just two examples of the flexibility of pricing that Pega BPM can give businesses. Camunda Platform is even more flexible on price than Pega BPM. They have an open- source version of the program which is absolutely free. This version possesses all of the core features of the paid version. The ability to maintain functionality and not have to pay expensive licensing costs is a game-changer. Conclusion Both of these products are potentially easy to set up. Pega BPM offers great flexibility in terms of pricing. Ultimately, Camunda platform’s open source version is more affordable without sacrificing functionality.
Related Articles
Piotr Mazur - PeerSpot reviewer
Digital Transformation Solution Manager at Altkom Software & Consutling
Mar 1, 2021
Digital transformation requires changes in most activity areas of the company. It is not only about changes in IT systems, BUT… Starting with a small project and delivering measurable results, is always a good way to efficiently prove to your organization the business case. I’d like to show you a case inspired by a real example, where a small IT project, lead to the digital transformation of t...
Product Comparisons
Related Articles
Piotr Mazur - PeerSpot reviewer
Digital Transformation Solution Manager at Altkom Software & Consutling
Mar 1, 2021
Digital transformation with the use of Camunda BPM?
Digital transformation requires changes in most activity areas of the company. It is not only abo...
Download Free Report
Download our FREE report comparing Camunda Platform and IBM BPM based on reviews, features, and more! Updated: November 2022.
655,774 professionals have used our research since 2012.