Unqork is assisting with AI-driven projects for my customers through Gen AI developments, but to be frank, I have never used that technology with AI. They are developing it, but it's not fully complete or widely used yet. We typically use our in-house AI to integrate by making API calls and then sending and receiving data. As of now, with Persistent, I had one customer for whom we developed two applications, but unfortunately, they are not using either due to performance issues. This dates back to around 2021. Now, I'm working with JPMorgan, where we have multiple in-house applications that everyone is using because they are not complex applications. We're using Unqork for systems such as ticketing, but I am also working on a more complex application that is still in the development phase. I rate the pricing for Unqork as a 7. They should consider making their pricing more flexible, particularly for small applications where customers may only want to test if it works before committing further. In those cases, they shouldn't charge as much as they do for standard applications. For JPMorgan, we have the license for approximately 2-3 crores per year, but I am not 100% sure since I haven't been involved in enterprise meetings for first-hand information. Overall, I would rate Unqork 6.5 to 7 out of 10.
Overall, I rate Unqork as eight. I would recommend it, especially to those without coding backgrounds. It provides opportunities for them to grow in this technology.
I would rate Unqork as an eight out of ten. I appreciate its low-code development features and ease of use, despite some performance issues and limited flexibility.
I recommend following Unqork documentation and practicing extensively to find new ways of improving project workflows. I rate Unqork ten out of ten for insurance projects. On a scale of 1 to 10, I would rate the overall solution a 10.
I recommend Unqork for internal platforms and domains like insurance with manageable traffic. However, I am cautious about recommending it for public platforms with high traffic until improvements in handling large data volumes are made. I rate Unqork as an eight out of ten for its overall functionality. Overall, I rate the product eight out of ten.
Tech Lead at a tech services company with 201-500 employees
Real User
Top 20
2025-04-24T08:18:20Z
Apr 24, 2025
Unqork has some limitations, so ensure your requirements are assessable before deciding. For new developers, focusing on workflow and data workflow is essential. I rate the overall solution as seven out of ten.
Performance Tester at a tech vendor with 201-500 employees
Real User
Top 20
2025-04-22T18:35:15Z
Apr 22, 2025
I would recommend Unqork to others because it offers extensive functionalities and provides a good opportunity for learning. I rate Unqork nine out of ten overall.
Senior Software Engineer at a retailer with 5,001-10,000 employees
Real User
Top 5
2025-04-02T14:32:53Z
Apr 2, 2025
I would recommend Unqork because of its time-saving capabilities and ease of use. However, Unqork should enhance its collaboration features, as currently, only one developer can work on a functionality at a time. Unqork could work on improving this aspect. Overall, I rate Unqork a six out of ten.
I recommend Unqork for those wanting to start their careers, particularly in sectors like insurance and banking. Unqork is frequently updated, offering opportunities with larger companies as it gains popularity. I would rate Unqork as a nine out of ten.
If people are from IT, Unqork is easy to use with a bit of practice. However, non-IT people need more time to practice. I rate Unqork between eight to 8.5 out of ten for its stability.
Unqork is a great choice over other BPMS tools like Pega. It's an opportunity worth considering for those in the field. I would rate the overall solution ten out of ten.
I recommend Unqork for projects with minimum access requirements. For more complex needs with multiple relational data, it is better to use external APIs to manage performance. I rate the overall solution a nine out of ten.
Unqork is a no-code application platform tailored for businesses looking to build and manage complex applications without traditional coding. It simplifies app development, enhancing agility and reducing time to market.Unqork provides a visual development environment that allows businesses to innovate without relying on traditional IT resources, leading to faster deployment and reduced costs. Users can rapidly prototype solutions in a drag-and-drop interface, making it accessible for...
Unqork is assisting with AI-driven projects for my customers through Gen AI developments, but to be frank, I have never used that technology with AI. They are developing it, but it's not fully complete or widely used yet. We typically use our in-house AI to integrate by making API calls and then sending and receiving data. As of now, with Persistent, I had one customer for whom we developed two applications, but unfortunately, they are not using either due to performance issues. This dates back to around 2021. Now, I'm working with JPMorgan, where we have multiple in-house applications that everyone is using because they are not complex applications. We're using Unqork for systems such as ticketing, but I am also working on a more complex application that is still in the development phase. I rate the pricing for Unqork as a 7. They should consider making their pricing more flexible, particularly for small applications where customers may only want to test if it works before committing further. In those cases, they shouldn't charge as much as they do for standard applications. For JPMorgan, we have the license for approximately 2-3 crores per year, but I am not 100% sure since I haven't been involved in enterprise meetings for first-hand information. Overall, I would rate Unqork 6.5 to 7 out of 10.
Overall, I rate Unqork as eight. I would recommend it, especially to those without coding backgrounds. It provides opportunities for them to grow in this technology.
I would rate Unqork as an eight out of ten. I appreciate its low-code development features and ease of use, despite some performance issues and limited flexibility.
I recommend following Unqork documentation and practicing extensively to find new ways of improving project workflows. I rate Unqork ten out of ten for insurance projects. On a scale of 1 to 10, I would rate the overall solution a 10.
I recommend Unqork for internal platforms and domains like insurance with manageable traffic. However, I am cautious about recommending it for public platforms with high traffic until improvements in handling large data volumes are made. I rate Unqork as an eight out of ten for its overall functionality. Overall, I rate the product eight out of ten.
Unqork has some limitations, so ensure your requirements are assessable before deciding. For new developers, focusing on workflow and data workflow is essential. I rate the overall solution as seven out of ten.
I would recommend Unqork to others because it offers extensive functionalities and provides a good opportunity for learning. I rate Unqork nine out of ten overall.
I would recommend Unqork because of its time-saving capabilities and ease of use. However, Unqork should enhance its collaboration features, as currently, only one developer can work on a functionality at a time. Unqork could work on improving this aspect. Overall, I rate Unqork a six out of ten.
I recommend Unqork for those wanting to start their careers, particularly in sectors like insurance and banking. Unqork is frequently updated, offering opportunities with larger companies as it gains popularity. I would rate Unqork as a nine out of ten.
If people are from IT, Unqork is easy to use with a bit of practice. However, non-IT people need more time to practice. I rate Unqork between eight to 8.5 out of ten for its stability.
Unqork is a great choice over other BPMS tools like Pega. It's an opportunity worth considering for those in the field. I would rate the overall solution ten out of ten.
I recommend Unqork for projects with minimum access requirements. For more complex needs with multiple relational data, it is better to use external APIs to manage performance. I rate the overall solution a nine out of ten.