I have not tried that yet. I haven't used it to that extent. I have not explored that yet. I have not used the advanced version yet. I have explored what was available for me in the free versions. I use ChatGPT more often, but in some situations, I have used Gemini and gotten good results for my use cases. I have also used the suggestions which I received from it and it has given me positive responses. I have basic understanding of this. It is a good tool. Even beginners can use it. For IT professionals, if we get dedicated code, there should be a version specifically for IT professionals who can give input and get desired output for coding parts. Users can definitely try the free version which is available for everyone. If they want more privacy and advanced features, they can pay and try that as well to get more detailed answers. The free version is good, but the main consideration is using our prompts. We cannot use any coding in online mode due to privacy concerns. I prefer using the advanced paid version which has more privacy for all IT-related work. I do not have much knowledge about machine learning algorithms as I have not recently worked with them. I worked for more than six months on that in my previous project. Review Rating: 8/10
Principal Data Architect at a computer software company with 201-500 employees
Real User
Top 10
2025-07-09T12:30:02Z
Jul 9, 2025
My advice or recommendation to other users who are looking into Gemini is that there are many options available, but from its core capabilities, especially multimodal capabilities, and from the agentic AI framework, Gemini is doing very well from that perspective. On a scale of 1-10, I rate Gemini a 9.
Product Manager for Marketing and Strategy at Oracle
Real User
Top 20
2025-06-20T08:13:50Z
Jun 20, 2025
I currently work at Oracle, so most of the tools we use are in-house and we don't use many third-party tools. However, one tool which comes into use quite a bit for us is Seismic, which I just started using. Seismic is a sales enablement tool that integrates with Salesforce, and as I am on the marketing side of things, we use this tool for providing enablement collateral for sales enablement. Personally, I use Figma as an open-source tool. After AI has come in, I largely rely on AI for most things and we have Oracle's own copilot. As an Oracle employee, I don't directly work with any Google solutions for AI or Microsoft, but we have Oracle's own AI interface that takes APIs from different LLM models, so we consume ChatGPT, Google Gemini, and Cohere through Oracle's interface built for us. I have not used scalable ML models, as I don't directly deal with the engineering side of things. I have not used Google Gemini on-premises; everything I've used has been through existing Google servers. For the pricing of Google Gemini, you can find it online; I've not used the paid version, but I know ChatGPT's paid versions aren't very expensive and I find the pricing model satisfactory for users. I don't use Google Gemini through AWS Marketplace as I'm an Oracle employee, so we use it through OCI, which is Oracle Cloud Infrastructure, a competitor of AWS. My rating for Google Gemini is 8 out of 10.
To hallucinate is when the model lies to you. Sometimes the responses are lies because it starts to imagine things which are not real. That's a hallucination. It's similar to being on drugs. I would rate Google Gemini as an eight.
I recommend using multiple frontier models for different tasks. Larger LLM providers offer specialized models; for instance, I use Google Gemini 2.5 research for research purposes. I rate the overall solution an 8 to 9.
Director at a tech services company with 501-1,000 employees
Real User
Top 20
2025-03-17T14:15:26Z
Mar 17, 2025
I recommend Google Gemini for its user-friendly interface and continuous improvement. However, the price may be a barrier for some users. Overall, I rate Google Gemini as an eight out of ten.
Google Gemini AI integrates into Google Workspace for productivity, leveraging multi-modal capabilities to optimize tasks in text, image, and data handling. It balances cost and performance, enhancing operations through seamless real-time data processing and intelligent assistance.Google Gemini AI is designed to enhance productivity through its integration with Google services, providing smart solutions for text writing, automated workflows, and image generation. It supports efficient data...
I have not tried that yet. I haven't used it to that extent. I have not explored that yet. I have not used the advanced version yet. I have explored what was available for me in the free versions. I use ChatGPT more often, but in some situations, I have used Gemini and gotten good results for my use cases. I have also used the suggestions which I received from it and it has given me positive responses. I have basic understanding of this. It is a good tool. Even beginners can use it. For IT professionals, if we get dedicated code, there should be a version specifically for IT professionals who can give input and get desired output for coding parts. Users can definitely try the free version which is available for everyone. If they want more privacy and advanced features, they can pay and try that as well to get more detailed answers. The free version is good, but the main consideration is using our prompts. We cannot use any coding in online mode due to privacy concerns. I prefer using the advanced paid version which has more privacy for all IT-related work. I do not have much knowledge about machine learning algorithms as I have not recently worked with them. I worked for more than six months on that in my previous project. Review Rating: 8/10
My advice or recommendation to other users who are looking into Gemini is that there are many options available, but from its core capabilities, especially multimodal capabilities, and from the agentic AI framework, Gemini is doing very well from that perspective. On a scale of 1-10, I rate Gemini a 9.
I currently work at Oracle, so most of the tools we use are in-house and we don't use many third-party tools. However, one tool which comes into use quite a bit for us is Seismic, which I just started using. Seismic is a sales enablement tool that integrates with Salesforce, and as I am on the marketing side of things, we use this tool for providing enablement collateral for sales enablement. Personally, I use Figma as an open-source tool. After AI has come in, I largely rely on AI for most things and we have Oracle's own copilot. As an Oracle employee, I don't directly work with any Google solutions for AI or Microsoft, but we have Oracle's own AI interface that takes APIs from different LLM models, so we consume ChatGPT, Google Gemini, and Cohere through Oracle's interface built for us. I have not used scalable ML models, as I don't directly deal with the engineering side of things. I have not used Google Gemini on-premises; everything I've used has been through existing Google servers. For the pricing of Google Gemini, you can find it online; I've not used the paid version, but I know ChatGPT's paid versions aren't very expensive and I find the pricing model satisfactory for users. I don't use Google Gemini through AWS Marketplace as I'm an Oracle employee, so we use it through OCI, which is Oracle Cloud Infrastructure, a competitor of AWS. My rating for Google Gemini is 8 out of 10.
To hallucinate is when the model lies to you. Sometimes the responses are lies because it starts to imagine things which are not real. That's a hallucination. It's similar to being on drugs. I would rate Google Gemini as an eight.
I would recommend Google Gemini to others. I would rate Google Gemini 8 out of 10 overall.
I recommend using multiple frontier models for different tasks. Larger LLM providers offer specialized models; for instance, I use Google Gemini 2.5 research for research purposes. I rate the overall solution an 8 to 9.
I recommend Google Gemini for its user-friendly interface and continuous improvement. However, the price may be a barrier for some users. Overall, I rate Google Gemini as an eight out of ten.
I rate the overall solution as eight out of ten.