Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

webMethods.io pros and cons

Vendor: IBM

4.0 out of 5

93 reviews
94% willing to recommend

2,881 followers

Pros & Cons summary

WebMethods.io offers high throughput and scalability, ideal for A2A and B2B integration. It excels in implementing business logic using ESB and BPM, supporting efficient API development. While known for a powerful integration server and connectors, it faces challenges like complex upgrades and dependency on support. Migration efforts, scalability issues with cloud apps, and high costs are concerns, but it remains a robust choice for internal and third-party system integration.

Buyer's Guide

Get pricing advice, tips, use cases and valuable features from real users of this product.

Prominent pros & cons

PROS

Segregation of deployment for environments is highly valued, providing effective API management and comprehensive catalog features.

Clients appreciate the intuitive interface, supporting seamless system interactions and fast communication.

Stability is a significant strength, highlighted by robust support for various digital documents like XMLs and EDI.

Ready-made tools for security and OAuth handling enhance webMethods.io's versatility in business integration scenarios.

Ease of implementation and flexible business logic management are core strengths, offering high throughput and scalability.

CONS

Forced migration from MessageBroker to Universal Messaging requires large-scale reimplementation for JMS.

There are performance issues with the analytics and prediction module that often cause problems.

The complex and labor-intensive version upgrade process presents significant challenges for many customers.

The lack of advanced monitoring and analytics capabilities necessitates additional tools for comprehensive insights.

The high pricing remains a major concern, suggesting a need for more competitive pricing options.

webMethods.io Pros review quotes

ZD

IT Manager at a manufacturing company with 5,001-10,000 employees

Dec 21, 2020

Application integrations are offered out-of-the-box, and that is extremely important to us. This is one of the main use cases that we have for it. It is about 60 to 70 percent of the workload in our application today.

Read full review

RF

Enterprise Architect at PT Bank Mandiri (Persero) Tbk.

Nov 25, 2020

One [of the most valuable features] is the webMethods Designer. That helps our developers develop on their own. It's very intuitive for design. It helps our developers to speed the development of services for the integrations.

Read full review

SJ

Systems Architect at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees

Mar 3, 2021

The comprehensiveness and depth of Integration Servers' connectors to packaged apps and custom apps is unlimited. They have a connector for everything. If they don't, you can build it yourself. Or oftentimes, if there is value for other customers as well, you can talk with webMethods about creating a new adapter for you.

Read full review

Free Report: webMethods.io Reviews and More

Learn what your peers think about webMethods.io. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: June 2025.

859,579 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Principal Architect and Advisor at a computer software company with 5,001-10,000 employees

Jan 18, 2023

What I like best about webMethods Integration Server is its portfolio of connectors.

Read full review

RF

Enterprise Architect at PT Bank Mandiri (Persero) Tbk.

Dec 15, 2020

Within the new version, webMethods API Gateway gives us an end-to-end lifecycle from the creation of the API up into the development, deployment, and promotion into production/live. The current end-to-end lifecycle of the API gives us enough authority and governance of the API. We know what are currently live services, what is in the testing stage of development, and what version that has been commissioned. So, the full life cycle itself gives us full authority and governance of the API.

Read full review

Michele Illiano

Head of Division at Innovery

Nov 18, 2022

The core product can be used not only for automatic file transfers between applications, but also as an Enterprise Service Bus (ESB).

Read full review

RS

Integration Lead at a wellness & fitness company with 5,001-10,000 employees

Dec 9, 2021

The development is very fast. If you know what you're doing, you can develop something very easily and very fast.

Read full review

DV

Dries Vanmarcke

Technical Architect at Colruyt

Apr 12, 2024

This solution has given us a competitive advantage because we have better automation and insight.

Read full review

AS

Enterprise Architect at a energy/utilities company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Oct 27, 2020

The solution has a very comprehensive and versatile set of connectors. I've been able to utilize it for multiple, different mechanisms. We do a lot of SaaS and we do have IoT devices and the solution is comprehensive in those areas.

Read full review

RJ

Rahul Jayakumar Lekha

Integration Lead at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

Oct 21, 2022

From a user perspective, the feature which I like the most about Integration Server is its designer.

Read full review

Show 10 more reviews (out of 87)

webMethods.io Cons review quotes

ZD

IT Manager at a manufacturing company with 5,001-10,000 employees

Dec 21, 2020

Upgrades are complex. They typically take about five months from start to finish. There are many packages that plug into webMethods Integration Server, which is the central point for a vast majority of the transactions at my organization. Anytime we are upgrading that, there are complexities within each component that we must understand. That makes any upgrade very cumbersome and complicated. That has been my experience at this company. Because there are many different business units that we are touching, there are so many different components that we are touching. The amount of READMEs that you have to go through takes some time.

Read full review

RF

Enterprise Architect at PT Bank Mandiri (Persero) Tbk.

Nov 25, 2020

The solution has big instances when deployed under microservices or in a containerized platform. They need to improve that so that it is competitive with other integration solutions, like Redis and Kafka. Deployments under microservices with those solutions are much more lightweight, in the size of the runtime itself, compared with Software AG.

Read full review

SJ

Systems Architect at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees

Mar 3, 2021

It would be nice if they had a change management system offering. We built our own deployer application because the one built into webMethods couldn't enforce change management rules. Integration into a change management system, along with the version control system, would be a good offering; it's something that they're lacking.

Read full review

Free Report: webMethods.io Reviews and More

Learn what your peers think about webMethods.io. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: June 2025.

859,579 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Principal Architect and Advisor at a computer software company with 5,001-10,000 employees

Jan 18, 2023

The market webMethods Integration Server falls under is a very crowded market, so for the product to stand out, Software AG would need to get traction in the open source community by releasing a new version or a base version and open source it, so people can create new custom components and add it to the portfolio.

Read full review

RF

Enterprise Architect at PT Bank Mandiri (Persero) Tbk.

Dec 15, 2020

With performance, there is room for improvement in regards to if we would like to put another extra layer of security on it, such as SSL. This is affecting their performance quite significantly. They need to improve the process of managing the SSL and other things inside their solutions, so there will not be quite such a significant impact to the performance.

Read full review

Michele Illiano

Head of Division at Innovery

Nov 18, 2022

I have noticed that webMethods ActiveTransfer has had problems when handling large files. For example, when we receive (and perform operations on) files that are larger than about 16 MB, the software starts losing performance.

Read full review

RS

Integration Lead at a wellness & fitness company with 5,001-10,000 employees

Dec 9, 2021

The UI for the admin console is very old. It hasn't been updated for years and is pretty much the same one that we started with. This is something that could be refreshed and made more modern.

Read full review

DV

Dries Vanmarcke

Technical Architect at Colruyt

Apr 12, 2024

With respect to the API gateway, the runtime component, the stability after a new release is something that can be improved.

Read full review

AS

Enterprise Architect at a energy/utilities company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Oct 27, 2020

The logging capability has room for improvement. That way, we could keep a history of all the transactions. It would be helpful to be able to get to that without having to build a standalone solution to do so.

Read full review

RJ

Rahul Jayakumar Lekha

Integration Lead at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

Oct 21, 2022

Support is expensive.

Read full review

Show 10 more reviews (out of 84)

Related questions

27

What are pros and cons of Red Hat Fuse vs webMethods Integration Server?

39

When evaluating Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS), what aspect do you think is the most important to look for?

28

Why do I need iPaas?

13

What is the best IpaaS solution?

176

Why is Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) important for companies?

63

How can we integrate with Korber OSM using a third-party integration platform like MuleSoft?