Tyk vs webMethods.io comparison

Tyk and IBM are both solutions in the API Management category. Tyk is ranked #17 with an average rating of 8.0, while IBM is ranked #11 with an average rating of 7.9. Tyk holds a 2.0% mindshare in APIM, compared to IBM’s 2.4% mindshare. Additionally, 83% of Tyk users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 94% of IBM users who would recommend it.

Tyk

Read 6 Tyk reviews

1,978 Views
1,978 Comparison Views

83% willing to recommend

webMethods.io

Read 93 webMethods.io reviews

8,870 Views
2,484 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

Tyk

webMethods.io

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 17, 2024

Tyk and webMethods.io are both strong contenders in the API management field, with Tyk offering strengths in modularity and access management, while webMethods.io stands out for its integration capabilities and scalability. webMethods.io is generally considered a better choice for large enterprises seeking comprehensive solutions.

Features: Tyk provides a robust API gateway, analytics tools, and comprehensive security features which are ideal for organizations needing detailed access control and the ability to work with open-source platforms. On the other hand, webMethods.io offers extensive integration possibilities, automation tools, and a suite of features that easily meet the needs of enterprises with complex IT landscapes, with a key focus on broad integration capabilities.

Room for Improvement: Tyk could enhance its cloud capabilities and mature its early-stage features to improve user experience and adoption. Improving developer portal features and interface design could also be beneficial. webMethods.io might consider refining its pricing model to provide more flexibility for smaller enterprises and enhance its API governance tools to match its competitors. Additional user-friendly customizations could improve customer satisfaction and application usability.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: webMethods.io's cloud-based deployment reduces maintenance burdens and includes strong customer support, facilitating easier onboarding although it lacks flexibility. In contrast, Tyk offers multiple deployment options such as on-premise and hybrid setups, which are advantageous for companies needing full infrastructure control but require significant internal resources for setup and maintenance.

Pricing and ROI: Tyk is attractive for businesses looking for scalable pricing without heavy upfront costs, potentially offering high ROI for those scaling over time. Conversely, webMethods.io typically presents a higher price point attributed to its comprehensive feature set, yet can yield significant ROI through advanced automation and integration, particularly for enterprises able to leverage its extensive capabilities effectively.

To learn more, read our detailed Tyk vs. webMethods.io Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Tyk vs. webMethods.io

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 872,846 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Tyk

Ranking in API Management

17th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

webMethods.io

Ranking in API Management

11th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business-to-Business Middleware (3rd), Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) (3rd), Managed File Transfer (MFT) (11th), Cloud Data Integration (10th), Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) (7th)

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2025, in the API Management category, the mindshare of Tyk is 2.0%, up from 1.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of webMethods.io is 2.4%, up from 2.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

API Management Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
webMethods.io	2.4%
Tyk	2.0%
Other	95.6%

API Management

Featured Reviews

MarkDoherty

Founding Director at Point Group

Fastest to get up and running and fewer idiosyncrasies than competitors

In terms of our usage, the main area of concern is that they tend to build enhancements slightly ahead of the considerations for what those enhancements and extensions are. So it could be slightly better communication with the customer base that would be my main issue with them. But as a product, it's very difficult to find any major faults.

Read full review

Derrick Brockel

Senior Manager of Operations at a comms service provider with 10,001+ employees

An integration platform that enables you to automate tasks by connecting apps and services

Follow best practices,engage in their professional services to help build your messaging system and to be PR have some PR emphasis and and blue Bluegreen deployment You could take half your your clusters out, upgrade them, and put them back in so you have a quick callback. And also patch quarterly, we got we got downbound. And and at that point, it's a little hard to get into the cycle when you're releasing software every every week, and you're trying to, go through an upgrade seven fifty servers, it's a little hard to get into the upgrade flow when when you're running that tight. I rate the overall solution an eight out of ten.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The feature I find most valuable is that this solution allows us to manage our security."

"The portal for developers that this solution provides has great functionality."

"You can set up workflows and write limited pieces of logic."

"The scalability is very good. That was a key factor in the selection, like how it could be pushed to high volume and scalability, which seemed to be very good."

"The most valuable feature is the load balancing with the circuit-breaker function."

"It is a good product for API management."

"ActiveTransfer lets us maintain the file in the staging area before we transfer it. After that, we can remove the file to make sure that the reconciliation process is done. Sometimes we will zip and unzip the files, but if we have a GKB file, we often ignore it."

"The solution has a very comprehensive and versatile set of connectors. I've been able to utilize it for multiple, different mechanisms. We do a lot of SaaS and we do have IoT devices and the solution is comprehensive in those areas."

"In the API gateway, there is a new feature that allows us to filter logs within a payload. This has been a useful feature."

"The most valuable feature of webMethods Integration Server is all the capabilities it provides. We leverage most of the features, that they have offered to us. Our vendor has made some additional features on top of the webMethods Integration Server and we use all the features together."

"The most valuable feature is stability."

"It's a visual tool, so our transformations can be quickly implemented without a lot of fuss. The fact that we have an easy way to expose REST services is also very interesting. It offers the possibility to connect over GMS to synchronize message brokers."

"The product supports various types of digital documents, including XMLs and EDI."

"The most valuable feature of the webMethods Integration Server is its reliability. It has a lot of great documentation from the service providers. Additionally, it is easy to use."

More webMethods.io pros

Cons

"It is a young product and does not have the kind of brand recognition that would make it a more popular solution with our clients."

"Sometimes when new features are released, they are not immediately stable."

"In terms of our usage, the main area of concern is that they tend to build enhancements slightly ahead of the considerations for what those enhancements and extensions are. So it could be slightly better communication with the customer base that would be my main issue with them."

"We ran it for a while, but then we decided to move away from Tyk, because Tyk's cloud version, the SaaS version, has a significant limitation of limited flexibility, so you can't program very much."

"I would like to see some additional features like having some extensions for .NET core because we use it for our back-end language."

"We would like a better tool for generating documentation for the APIs to be developed."

"Some things could be improved, especially how ActiveTransfer handles third-party file transfers. It would be nice to have a native file-watching mechanism for when you're scheduling jobs with a third-party scheduler. Currently, we are using an outside file watcher solution to check the files before the file transfer. It checks the location to see if the file is there. If the file is there, it will prepare it for transfer. If the file isn't available, it will send an email it can create a ticket send it now. We recommended adding this file watcher mechanism."

"The products, at the moment, are new and there should perhaps be support for the older version of the protocols."

"Understanding the overall architecture is difficult."

"Prices should be reduced, ideally by up to 30% for long-term customers like us."

"The configuring of the JWT token would be improved as it is a confusing process. We require more information on this part of the solution."

"The orchestration is not as good as it should be."

"Need to see more API portal features like monetizing APIs and private cloud readiness."

"In terms of scale, I would give it a four out of 10."

More webMethods.io cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"There are different versions and plans available depending on the requirements, so there is flexibility in terms of the pricing."

"The price is low compared to other products of a similar type."

"It had a free version, which suited many of our needs, but not all, but we were happy to go ahead with the licensed version as well, which is the paid version."

"We are using the open-source version of this product, so there are no licensing costs for its use."

"The cost curve is far smoother, both in terms of volume and the number of calls it's running on, compared to most competitors. So it's a tad more expensive at the very low end, but the curve is nothing like Apigee or some of the others."

"The price of webMethods Integration Server isn't that high from an enterprise context, but open-source ESB solutions will always be the cheapest."

"Pricing is the number-one downfall. It's too expensive. They could make more money by dropping the price in half and getting more customers. It's the best product there is, but it's too expensive."

"Sometimes we don't have a very clear idea what the licensing will entail at first, because it can be very customizable. On one hand, this can be a good thing, because it can be tailored to a specific customer's needs. But on the other hand it can also be an issue when some customer asks, "What's the cost?" and we can't yet give them an accurate answer."

"I do think webMethods is coming under increasing pressure when it comes to their price-to-feature value proposition. It's probably the single biggest strategic risk they have. They're very expensive in their industry. They've been raising the price recently, especially when compared with their competitors."

"Currently, the licensing solution for this product is pretty straightforward. The way that Software AG has moved in their licensing agreements is very understandable. It is very easy for you to see where things land. Like most vendors today, they are transaction based. Therefore, just having a good understanding of how many transactions that you are doing a year would be very wise. Luckily, there are opportunities to work with the vendor to get a good understanding of how many transactions you have and what is the right limit for you to fall under."

"Based on our team discussions and feedback, it is pretty costly because they charge us for each transmission."

"webMethods.io Integration's pricing is high and has yearly subscription costs."

"The pricing is a yearly license."

More webMethods.io pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which API Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

872,846 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

25%

Computer Software Company

13%

Comms Service Provider

Government

Manufacturing Company

14%

Computer Software Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Energy/Utilities Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	23
Midsize Enterprise	11
Large Enterprise	63

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Tyk?

The scalability is very good. That was a key factor in the selection, like how it could be pushed to high volume and scalability, which seemed to be very good.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Tyk?

The pricing is actually quite competitive. In Azure environments, it gets beaten by Microsoft API Gateway, but on the other hand, it offers some features that Microsoft lacks. So it really comes do...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Tyk?

See all answers

What do you like most about Built.io Flow?

The tool helps us to streamline data integration. Its BPM is very strong and powerful. The solution helps us manage digital transformation.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Built.io Flow?

webMethods.io is expensive. We have multiple components, and you need to pay for each of them.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Built.io Flow?

webMethods.io needs to incorporate ChatGPT to enhance user experience. It can offer a customized user experience.

See all answers

Comparisons

Traefik Enterprise vs Tyk

Compared 14% of the time

Apigee vs Tyk

Compared 12% of the time

Apache APISIX vs Tyk

Compared 12% of the time

Amazon API Gateway vs Tyk

Compared 11% of the time

3scale API Management vs Tyk

Compared 9% of the time

More Tyk Competitors

IBM App Connect vs webMethods.io

Compared 8% of the time

IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services vs webMethods.io

Compared 7% of the time

Apigee vs webMethods.io

Compared 6% of the time

IBM Integration Bus vs webMethods.io

Compared 6% of the time

Boomi iPaaS vs webMethods.io

Compared 5% of the time

More webMethods.io Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Tyk

October 2025

Download Tyk product report

Buyer's Guide

webMethods.io

October 2025

Download webMethods.io product report

Also Known As

No data available

Built.io Flow, webMethods Integration Server, webMethods Trading Networks, webMethods ActiveTransfer, webMethods.io API

Overview

Tyk is an open source API Gateway that is fast and scalable, an API management platform featuring an API gateway, analytics, developer portal and dashboard. Available in three flavours to best suit your architecture and governance. We offer full cloud or on-premises options, and the best of both worlds with our unique hybrid model. www.tyk.io

Tyk

webMethods.io Integration is a powerful integration platform as a service (iPaaS) that provides a combination of capabilities offered by ESBs, data integration systems, API management tools, and B2B gateways.

IBM

Sample Customers

Trip Advisor, Juniper Networks, AT&T

Cisco, Agralogics, Dreamforce, Cables & Sensors, Sacramento Kings

Buyer's Guide

Tyk vs. webMethods.io

September 2025

Free Report: Tyk vs. webMethods.io

Find out what your peers are saying about Tyk vs. webMethods.io and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

872,846 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Tyk vs. webMethods.io report.

See our list of best API Management vendors and best Cloud Data Integration vendors.

We monitor all API Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.