Trend Vision One Endpoint Security vs WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection comparison

Trend Vision One Endpoint Security vs. WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection

Download the complete report

Helped 849,686 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Trend Vision One Endpoint S...

Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

5th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

131

Ranking in other categories

Endpoint Compliance (3rd), Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) (6th)

WithSecure Elements Endpoin...

Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

51st

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category, the mindshare of Trend Vision One Endpoint Security is 1.8%, down from 2.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection is 0.7%, down from 0.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

Featured Reviews

John Trembly

Technical Specialist at Iona Catholic Secondary School

Provides a single dashboard, integrates well, and has predictive machine learning

Microsoft's new Azure Code Signing is causing a lot of issues for us with One Endpoint Security. We currently have two systems in operation, on-prem and SaaS, and many of the agents won't upgrade beyond version B11564 because these newer versions require Azure Code Signing compliance on the endpoint. If we are not up to date with our Windows updates, we don't have this compliance. Irrespective of the Windows version we are running, we have to apply patches to the machines, if the OS is not damaged, to make them compliant. After that, we can upgrade to the latest version of the respective agent. This process also applies to both Deep Security and Workload Security. I have two production servers: one for Windows and another for Mac. These servers are available in both on-premise and SaaS versions. Additionally, I have a test server that is located on-premises. The significant distinction with the SaaS version is the absence of a test server where I can install a new version. This means I can't allow the agents on it to upgrade and then perform testing. In contrast, with the production SaaS version of One Endpoint Security, I have numerous agents transitioning and coming online. It's essential that these agents upgrade to a newer version. Among these agents, there are five or six different versions, not counting the really old ones that have yet to upgrade due to ACS non-compliance. I can't leave the testing phase for an extended period because I still have outdated agents that need to be updated. These agents can't be left hanging while I wait to test the newest version that has just been released. New versions seem to come out every couple of months in the SaaS environment. In the past, when I solely used the on-premises version, I would review security bulletins for the SaaS version to identify any issues. I'm apprehensive about potential future situations involving this, primarily because the majority of our agents now operate on the cloud version. If a problem is discovered, rolling back on those agents would be challenging. It would require careful operation to revert them to a different version. The on-premises version of One Endpoint Security has an update function that allows us to manually update a bunch of servers. For example, if I just turned on a policy, I can force the agents to quickly download the policy and start following the update procedure or update settings. However, this function is not available in the SaaS version. This is because the system cannot communicate with the agent through the firewall. The SaaS version has an automatic update function and an update source entry in the update agents sub-menu, but it does not have a way to force agents to update. This is a problem because we cannot automatically update the agents. We have to manually log in to the machines and give them an update command. Currently, we have no choice but to wait until the agents find the updates themselves.

Read full review

Muhammed Abdul Gafoor

Chief Information Officer at Future Generations Computers LLC

Has an easy initial setup process, but there could be more integration options

The initial setup is easy. I rate the process a seven or eight out of ten. We have LPR procurement. The deployment involves installing the product and adding a license. It takes three to four days to complete and requires a team of less than ten people to execute the process.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It is very precise and allows more permission for different use cases."

"It's a good solution, and they have something called Suite incorporating many, many engines like encryption, GLB, anti-virus."

"We've been able to integrate the solution with other security products."

"The monitoring is very good."

"Apex One includes a built-in fine-grained DLP solution."

"It's reduced administrative overhead."

"I have found Trend Micro Apex One to be secure."

"The most valuable features are reporting and where we have the ability to report back and provide information when an item is quarantined or not quarantined."

More Trend Vision One Endpoint Security pros

"F-Secure is useful for keeping user machines up-to-date by pushing out security and critical updates."

"There is a layer of security to prevent a malicious agent (malware) from interrupting or stopping services, deleting or modifying registry entries or even stopping the antivirus from acting, ensuring that there will be no interruption of protection."

"We use the product for detecting network vulnerabilities and for software update purposes."

"The notifications and patch management features are valuable."

"WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection is good and easy to set up."

"On the cloud management page, the solution scales up very highly."

"The most valuable features of WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection are the clear useful portal and overall company protection."

"Both incoming and outgoing traffic is protected."

Cons

"Whether the license is monthly or annual depends on the deal of the company."

"Trend Micro should make the agent lighter. When we run the scanning process, it consumes a lot of memory, and the performance is degraded. It is very invasive. It could be lighter. When we used Symantec, we didn't have this problem when we ran our scanning process. It worked like a charm. On the endpoints, it didn't feel like that the process is running, whereas, in Trend Micro Apex One, we can feel that the endpoint is running slow. Sometimes it even hangs. Scanning should be faster."

"The customization has room for improvement."

"The role-based access control needs improvement."

"I am expecting an Apple featured IDLP solution with OfficeScan, where we have only IDLP. Also, the ADR functionality in our Office Scan solution would be a nice addition. Genrally, the ADR solutions are the only failed ends of the solutions we have found with Trend Micro."

"Apex One's threat and vulnerability management has room for improvement."

"When I create and implement a new policy , it takes a couple of hours to apply to the devices."

"Trend Micro Apex One could improve by having better integration in the future."

More Trend Vision One Endpoint Security cons

"There is no technical support available in the Middle East."

"The solution could improve by having more real-time responses. For example, when a license gets removed from a computer it does not update the records of the change. Additionally, when I installed Microsoft Windows Defender I was not able to send licenses through email to our tenants. The integration with other solutions could improve."

"One problem is that the solution takes too much RAM from the client."

"I would like the part of Hash Analysis by external sources to be improved."

"Resource consumption is suboptimal and could be improved."

"But the biggest one for us is patch management because this has been our top priority when looking at alternatives. Every solution needs to have patch management, if that's possible. It would cut costs on our side if that feature were included, so we don't need to pay for two separate pieces of software."

"There could be a dedicated security partner with essential knowledge."

"The program and cloud service management is in English. It's not a problem for me, however, it might be for users who don't speak English or use it regularly."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Its pricing should be improved."

"On a scale of one to ten with ten being the most expensive, Apex One is an eight."

"If I remember correctly, the cost is approximately four and a half thousand per year."

"The price of the solution is fair and there is a per-user license to use the solution. Our costs are approximately $2,000 a month, it can get costly if you have a lot of users."

"Opting for cloud solutions can provide a more cost-effective and efficient alternative, with fewer dependencies on physical setups and unexpected costs associated with on-premises tasks."

"On a yearly basis, it's about $50,000. There are no costs in addition to the standard licensing fees."

"It has a per-user license."

"There is a license for this solution and it can be paid for monthly or annually."

More Trend Vision One Endpoint Security pricing and cost advice

"We pay a yearly licensing fee of about €20 per computer."

"The price is comparable."

"The product has average pricing."

"The cost of the solution depends on the size of the company and where the licenses are being ordered from."

"If you purchase licenses in bulk the price of the licenses can decrease."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

849,686 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Educational Organization

49%

Computer Software Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

Computer Software Company

19%

Comms Service Provider

15%

Government

University

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What's the difference between Trend Micro Deep Security and Trend Micro Apex One?

Trend Micro Deep Security offers a lot of features. It guarantees security for your data center, cloud, and containers - all with a unified and comprehensive SaaS solution and without compromising ...

What do you like most about Trend Micro Apex One?

It is updated automatically without much intervention from our side. We can also get some reports easily.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Trend Micro Apex One?

The pricing is very high, despite the solution’s capabilities.

What do you like most about F-Secure Protection Service for Business?

The notifications and patch management features are valuable.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for F-Secure Protection Service for Business?

The pricing is scalable. We can purchase more licenses if needed. It's a more cost-effective solution compared to Darktrace, which requires a special device purchase.

What needs improvement with F-Secure Protection Service for Business?

One problem is that the solution takes too much RAM from the client. It would help if it used less RAM in future versions.

Trend Micro Deep Security vs Trend Vision One Endpoint Security

Comparisons

Compared 20% of the time

Trend Vision One vs Trend Vision One Endpoint Security

Compared 19% of the time

Trend Micro Worry-Free Services Suites vs Trend Vision One Endpoint Security

Compared 7% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Trend Vision One Endpoint Security

Compared 5% of the time

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks vs Trend Vision One Endpoint Security

Compared 4% of the time

More Trend Vision One Endpoint Security Competitors

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection

Compared 38% of the time

ESET Endpoint Protection Platform vs WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection

Compared 16% of the time

Sophos EPP Suite vs WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection

Compared 11% of the time

Symantec Endpoint Security vs WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection

Compared 6% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection

Compared 4% of the time

More WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection Competitors

Product Reports

Trend Vision One Endpoint Security

Download Trend Vision One Endpoint Security product report

Trend Vision One Endpoint Security report

WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection

Download WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection product report

WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection report

Also Known As

Trend Micro Apex One, OfficeScan, Trend Micro OfficeScan

F-Secure Elements Endpoint Protection, F-Secure Protection Service for Business

Overview

Trend Vision One Endpoint Security delivers comprehensive antivirus, data protection, and device management. It offers robust threat detection and is deployable on-premises or via the cloud, making it versatile for endpoint security across organizations.

Emphasizing reliable endpoint security, Trend Vision One guards workstations and servers with extended detection and response features. Its machine learning-driven threat detection offers protection from malware and viruses, including zero-day threats. With seamless updates and automation, it minimizes administrative burdens, making deployment efficient. Criticisms include high resource use during scans and integration complexities, with calls for improved data loss prevention and better encryption. Users see the need for enhanced Linux support and quicker security updates.

What features define Trend Vision One Endpoint Security?

Real-time threat detection: Provides immediate alerts on potential risks.
Virtual patching: Protects against known vulnerabilities without software updates.
Centralized management console: Facilitates efficient device management.
Machine learning: Enhances detection with advanced analytics.
Zero-day threat protection: Guards against unforeseen attacks.
Ransomware detection: Identifies and prevents ransomware incursions.
Automated updates: Ensures systems are protected with the latest safeguards.

Which benefits are crucial in reviews?

Reducing administrative overhead: Automation decreases time spent on routine tasks.
Efficient threat response: Facilitates quick identification and mitigation of risks.
Seamless system updates: Keeps protection up to date without disruptions.
Improving operational efficiency: Integrates smoothly with existing security solutions.

In the finance sector, Trend Vision One is implemented for robust data protection and regulatory compliance. Healthcare providers rely on it for protecting sensitive patient information from cyber threats. Retailers use it for safeguarding payment systems and customer data against breaches, ensuring uninterrupted business operations.

Trend Micro

WithSecure (formerly F-Secure) Elements Endpoint Protection is cloud-native, AI-powered endpoint protection that you can deploy instantly from your browser and manage easily from a single console. It integrates across all your endpoints, keeping your organization fenced in from attacks. WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection is a module of the Elements cyber security platform. The cloud-based platform provides effective protection against ransomware and advanced attacks. Elements brings together vulnerability management, automated patch management, dynamic threat intelligence and continuous behavioral analytics. Use individual solutions for specific needs or combine them all seamlessly for maximum defense.

WithSecure

Sample Customers

Atma Jaya Catholic University of Indonesia, A&W Food Services of Canada, Babou, Beth Israel Deaconess Care Organization (BO), DCI Donor Services, Evalueserve, Gulftainer, Hiroshima Prefectural Government, MEDHOST

Information Not Available

Trend Vision One Endpoint Security vs. WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection