Sonatype Repository Firewall vs Veracode comparison

Sonatype Repository Firewall

Read 204 Veracode reviews

19,783 Views
12,859 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 8, 2024

Veracode and Sonatype Repository Firewall are both major players in the application security industry. Sonatype Repository Firewall seems to have the upper hand due to its stronger feature offerings, while Veracode receives positive feedback for its pricing and support.

Features: Veracode provides comprehensive vulnerability scanning, integration capabilities, and strong scanning coverage. Sonatype Repository Firewall offers effective policy enforcement, real-time vulnerability prevention, and proactive threat blocking.

Room for Improvement: Veracode users wish for better integration with certain tools, enhanced scanning speeds, and faster process improvements. Sonatype users point to a need for improved documentation, more customizable policy settings, and a simpler learning curve.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Veracode is known for its straightforward deployment model and strong customer support, appreciated for its clear setup process. Sonatype Repository Firewall provides a flexible cloud-based deployment model with competent support but may involve a steeper learning curve.

Pricing and ROI: Veracode has competitive setup costs with potential for improved ROI through speedier process enhancements. Sonatype Repository Firewall incurs higher costs, yet users recognize a strong ROI due to its robust security features.

To learn more, read our detailed Sonatype Repository Firewall vs. Veracode Report (Updated: August 2025).

Sonatype Repository Firewall vs. Veracode

Download the complete report

Helped 867,349 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Sonatype Repository Firewall

Ranking in Application Security Tools

28th

Ranking in Software Composition Analysis (SCA)

14th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Veracode

Ranking in Application Security Tools

2nd

Ranking in Software Composition Analysis (SCA)

3rd

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

204

Ranking in other categories

Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (2nd), Container Security (8th), Static Code Analysis (1st), Application Security Posture Management (ASPM) (2nd)

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2025, in the Application Security Tools category, the mindshare of Sonatype Repository Firewall is 0.5%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Veracode is 8.0%, down from 10.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Security Tools Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Veracode	8.0%
Sonatype Repository Firewall	0.5%
Other	91.5%

Application Security Tools

Featured Reviews

Ashish Shukla

Global Treasurer at Genpact

You will get clean code every time, and that's a great achievement

For the QA team, it's a really good tool. For those who are not on the QA team, it is also a good tool to use for SDL in the SDLC. It plays a very critical role of doing the automatic quality check recommendation. Meaning, when using this tool, people can easily rectify the issues in the environment itself, instead of going to a higher environment and identifying them. This tool is quite easy to use and learn. We decided that there was no need to hire anyone new who would specialize in this. We had a team of about five to ten people who learned how to use this tool. There are some other automation tools like Jenkins, for example, that require a lot of effort to configure and write out the code, but you do not need to do such for this tool. I thought outside of the box and saw that there are many options available to us when using this tool. The plugins are there, you can download and use the tool at ease and you do not need to do any kind of development. Overall, it’s quite easy to use.

Read full review

Kv Rao

Site Leader (India) at Industrial Scientific

Integrates pipelines smoothly and fortifies code against vulnerabilities

I use Veracode in multiple places including static code analysis, penetration testing, and dynamic code analysis. It is part of our pipeline and integrates well with Bitbucket and Git pipelines The ease of integration with Bitbucket pipelines and Git pipelines is vital for us. Veracode allows us…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The firewall is the only solution that supports Nexus Repository."

"Another thing that I like about Sonatype is that if you download something today, and five days from today it becomes vulnerable, it will notify you."

"The product's network and intrusion protection features are valuable. It also has rules and compliance features for security."

"The customer service is fantastic."

"Veracode creates a list of issues. You can go through them one by one and click through to a new window with all the information about the issue discovered."

"It changes the DevSecOps process because we find flaws much earlier in the development life cycle, and we also spot third-party software that we don't allow on developers' machines."

"I appreciate the integration provided by Veracode that seamlessly integrates with our CI/CD tools and allows us to integrate with IPA as well."

"The centralized view of different testing types helps reduce our risk exposure. The development teams have the freedom to choose their own libraries and languages. What happens is sometimes developers feel like a particular library is okay to use, then they will start using it, developing some functionality around it. However, as per our mandate, for every new repository that gets added and scanned, a report gets published. Based on that report, we decide if we can continue. In the past, we have found, by mistake, some developers have used copyleft licenses, which are a bit risky to use. We immediately replace these with more permissive, open-source licenses, so we are safe in the end."

"In terms of application security best practices and guidance to our teams, their engineering staff is really excellent. They provide our developers with suggestions and they take those to heart. They've learned from the recommended remediation strategies provided by the Veracode security engineers. That makes all of their future code better."

"With the tools that Veracode provides, our developers are actually able to comprehend what the vulnerability was and then resolve it. So a lot of knowledge has been grown as a result, around security, with our developers."

"The most valuable features are that you can do static analysis and dynamic analysis on a scheduled basis and that you can push the findings into JIRA."

"I have found the user interface extremely helpful in prioritizing issues."

More Veracode pros

Cons

"What I don't like is the lack of an option to pick up the phone and call someone for support. That is something they need to improve on. They need to have a professional services package, or they need to include that option with their services."

"The tool needs to improve its file systems. The product should also include zero test feature."

"There are several features lacking in the current offering, particularly concerning container support and AI packages, like humming phase support."

"There are several features lacking in the current offering, particularly concerning container support and AI packages."

"Veracode needs to shift to a more modern approach because it still feels traditional in its way of doing code scanning compared with others, such as Snyk."

"Maybe the boards could be made easier to understand or easier to customize."

"I would like to see more AI features. It's a current subject because with ChatGPT and other solutions being developed all the time, IT attacks will increase... To defend against those it's very important that the good guys use AI in ways that are good instead of bad."

"It does not have a reporting structure for an OS-based vulnerability report, whereas its peers such as Fortify and Checkmarx have this ability. Checkmarx also provides a better visibility of the code flow."

"Veracode's container scanning could be improved. We containerize all the platforms we use inside a Docker image. For example, we create a Microsoft Docker image that we build our application on top of. I would like Veracode to implement IT scans before we commit the code."

"The on-platform reporting needs to be opened up much more. We'd like to be able to look at the inspection data from a trending perspective in a much more open manner. I need to be able to sort and filter much more flexibly than I can today."

"The reporting was detailed, but there were some things that were missing. It showed us on which line an error was found, but it could have been more detailed."

"Veracode does not support scans for .NET Blazor server applications."

More Veracode cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing is reasonable if you're a large enterprise developing code. It's not super-expensive."

"No issues, the pricing seems reasonable."

"The pricing of the product depends upon the number of codes or the number of applications."

"The cost has been a barrier to wider use here. I think my team is the only one at the university. Other folks might like to use it, but it's pretty pricey. You could see what else is in the market, but I hear that's the price for most solutions. You might not find a better deal in the market, or it might be an incomplete solution. I mean, for the level of interaction we get with Veracode staff, it's been pretty good."

"Veracode is one of the more expensive solutions in the market, but it is worth the expense because of the eLearning and the security consultations; everything is included in the license."

"The cost of scanning code is cheaper. It's typically $0.50 per line of code. However, it's expensive to run a high-level process that would normally require a human security expert. For example, penetration testing costs about $1,000 per application for penetration testing. The cost of these features may be too high for smaller organizations. On the other hand, Veracode's interactive application security testing is fast and cheaper compared to other software."

"I don't have firsthand knowledge of Veracode pricing, but based on client feedback, it seems to be expensive with additional fees for certain features."

"It can be expensive to do this, so I would just make sure that you're getting the proper number of licenses. Do your analysis. Make sure you know exactly what it is you need, going in."

"I'm unfamiliar with the solution's pricing, but it must be worth the cost from a company perspective, as we have been using it for years and have no plans to move away from it."

More Veracode pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

867,349 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

23%

Government

11%

Insurance Company

10%

University

Financial Services Firm

16%

Computer Software Company

16%

Manufacturing Company

Insurance Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	69
Midsize Enterprise	43
Large Enterprise	112

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Sonatype Nexus Firewall?

Also, I consider it average. Some people might consider it expensive, however, since it supports many beautiful features, I would say it is worth it.

What is your primary use case for Sonatype Nexus Firewall?

Many companies, including ours, use Nexus Repository due to concerns about malware and critical vulnerabilities. There should be a specific method to prevent malicious packages from entering the in...

What advice do you have for others considering Sonatype Nexus Firewall?

I would give the solution eight out of ten. I would look at the comparison of Sonatype to some other firewalls. There is room for improvement, especially mentioning container support and AI packages.

Which gives you more for your money - SonarQube or Veracode?

SonarQube is easy to deploy and configure, and also integrates well with other tools to do quality code analysis. SonarQube has a great community edition, which is open-source and free. Easy to use...

What do you like most about Veracode?

The SAST and DAST modules are great.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Veracode?

The product’s price is a bit higher compared to other solutions. However, the tool provides good vulnerability and database features. It is worth the money.

JFrog Xray vs Sonatype Repository Firewall

Comparisons

Compared 30% of the time

Black Duck vs Sonatype Repository Firewall

Compared 16% of the time

Sonatype Lifecycle vs Sonatype Repository Firewall

Compared 11% of the time

Snyk vs Sonatype Repository Firewall

Compared 11% of the time

Mend.io vs Sonatype Repository Firewall

Compared 5% of the time

More Sonatype Repository Firewall Competitors

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs Veracode

Compared 16% of the time

Checkmarx One vs Veracode

Compared 9% of the time

GitHub Advanced Security vs Veracode

Compared 7% of the time

OpenText Core Application Security vs Veracode

Compared 4% of the time

OWASP Zap vs Veracode

Compared 4% of the time

More Veracode Competitors

Product Reports

Application Security Tools

Download Sonatype Repository Firewall product report

Download Veracode product report

Also Known As

Sonatype Nexus Firewall, Nexus Firewall

Crashtest Security , Veracode Detect

Overview

Sonatype Repository Firewall is a cloud-based security solution designed to safeguard your software supply chain against malicious components. It operates by meticulously scanning and evaluating each new component against customized governance policies, thereby effectively identifying and blocking potential threats before they infiltrate your development pipeline. What sets Sonatype Repository Firewall apart is its user-friendly setup, seamless integration with existing workflows, and remarkable scalability, making it suitable for software development environments of any size. Key features include blocking malicious components through behavioral analysis, malware scanning, and vulnerability assessment, as well as the ability to enforce custom governance policies. By utilizing this tool, organizations can enhance their software supply chain security, mitigate risks related to supply chain attacks, bolster compliance with industry standards, and ultimately reduce costs associated with security incidents.

Sonatype

Veracode is a leading provider of application security solutions, offering tools to identify, mitigate, and prevent vulnerabilities across the software development lifecycle. Its cloud-based platform integrates security into DevOps workflows, helping organizations ensure that their code remains secure and compliant with industry standards.

Veracode supports multiple application security testing types, including static analysis (SAST), dynamic analysis (DAST), software composition analysis (SCA), and manual penetration testing. These tools are designed to help developers detect vulnerabilities early in development while maintaining speed in deployment. Veracode also emphasizes scalability, offering features for enterprises that manage a large number of applications across different teams. Its robust reporting and analytics capabilities allow organizations to continuously monitor their security posture and track progress toward remediation.

What are the key features of Veracode?

Static Analysis (SAST) - Scans source code for vulnerabilities before deployment.
Dynamic Analysis (DAST) - Examines applications in a running state to detect flaws in real-time.
Software Composition Analysis (SCA) - Identifies risks in open-source libraries and third-party components.
Manual Penetration Testing - Offers expert analysis for more complex vulnerabilities.
Integrations with DevOps tools - Seamlessly integrates with CI/CD pipelines for automated security checks.

What benefits should users consider in Veracode reviews?

Early detection of vulnerabilities - Helps developers fix security issues early in the development process.
Scalability - Supports organizations with large-scale application portfolios.
Compliance support - Ensures applications meet various security standards and regulations.
Developer training - Provides tools for educating developers on secure coding practices.
Comprehensive reporting - Offers detailed reports that track remediation and risk trends.

Veracode is widely adopted in industries like finance, healthcare, and government, where compliance and security are critical. It helps these organizations maintain strict security standards while enabling rapid development through its integration with Agile and DevOps methodologies.

Veracode helps businesses secure their applications efficiently, ensuring they can deliver safe and compliant software at scale.

Sample Customers

EDF, Tomitribe, Crosskey, Blackboard, Travel audience

Manhattan Associates, Azalea Health, Sabre, QAD, Floor & Decor, Prophecy International, SchoolCNXT, Keap, Rekner, Cox Automotive, Automation Anywhere, State of Missouri and others.

Sonatype Repository Firewall vs. Veracode