Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Sharepoint 2016 Standard vs TetraScience comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Sharepoint 2016 Standard
Ranking in AWS Marketplace
36th
Average Rating
9.0
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
TetraScience
Ranking in AWS Marketplace
78th
Average Rating
6.6
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Featured Reviews

LG
Integration of diverse AI functions and adaptable features provides efficient operational solutions
From a client's perspective, I encounter several challenges when implementing new systems, and in my last role, they faced significant issues with their previous software. After assessing their situation, it was clear that continuing on their current path would lead to excessive costs. Recognizing that Sharepoint 2016 Standard could fulfill their needs efficiently, I engaged my team, and after seven months, we had a fully operational system in place. As a project manager, I design what I need from AI within Sharepoint 2016 Standard, knowing I always get good results. While the technical details may not be my forte, I have a network of strong experts working alongside me, making sure our processes succeed according to the plans I put in place.
Varun Khandavalli - PeerSpot reviewer
Efficient data integration and good automation with challenging configurability
The application has a difficult-to-use parsing capability, which requires a lot of reengineering when the use case isn't specifically met. The application also lacks capabilities within its terminal commands that are not available in their GUI. It requires a lot of configurability, which could be streamlined for an enterprise application user.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which AWS Marketplace solutions are best for your needs.
860,168 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Sharepoint 2016 Standard?
Pricing for Sharepoint 2016 Standard, in my view, is favorable, as it is based on the days of person-hours worked. In contrast, while attempting to implement another documentation system, the costs...
What needs improvement with Sharepoint 2016 Standard?
From a client's perspective, I encounter several challenges when implementing new systems, and in my last role, they faced significant issues with their previous software. After assessing their sit...
What is your primary use case for Sharepoint 2016 Standard?
My experience with Sharepoint 2016 Standard involves working on a project developed for the Justice Department of Quebec for about seven or eight months, where I managed change management, integrat...
What needs improvement with TetraScience?
The application has a difficult-to-use parsing capability, which requires a lot of reengineering when the use case isn't specifically met. The application also lacks capabilities within its termina...
What is your primary use case for TetraScience?
TetraScience is a platform that integrates instruments into a laboratory environment into other software applications that can help leverage the data. In most pharma companies, the application is u...
What advice do you have for others considering TetraScience?
I would approach with caution. The platform has a high knowledge gap and the proprietary nature of its parsers and crawling agents. Before approaching TetraScience, have your use case in hand and u...
 

Comparisons

No data available
No data available
 

Overview

Find out what your peers are saying about Canonical, Confluent, Sophos and others in AWS Marketplace. Updated: June 2025.
860,168 professionals have used our research since 2012.