Semmle QL vs Spirent CyberFlood comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Semmle Logo
307 views|264 comparisons
Spirent Logo
183 views|118 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Semmle QL and Spirent CyberFlood based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Sonar, Veracode, Checkmarx and others in Application Security Tools.
To learn more, read our detailed Application Security Tools Report (Updated: May 2024).
770,765 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Use Semmle QL?
Haider Jarral
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "CyberFlood is reasonably priced."
  • More Spirent CyberFlood Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Tools solutions are best for your needs.
    770,765 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Top Answer:Sometimes, when you configure parameters the hardware can't run, it will get stuck at those points without telling you what happened. It would be helpful if the error reporting provided more details… more »
    Top Answer:I use CyberFlood to generate SSL traffic for cybersecurity testing.
    Ranking
    Views
    307
    Comparisons
    264
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Views
    183
    Comparisons
    118
    Reviews
    2
    Average Words per Review
    225
    Rating
    8.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    CyberFlood Virtual, Spirent Mu Dynamics Application Security Testing, Mu Dynamics Application Security Testing
    Learn More
    Semmle
    Video Not Available
    Overview

    Our mission is to help everyone involved in software engineering create secure and trustworthy code without slowing down.

    Combining the fields of databases, programming languages, data science and security we're making the world’s software truly searchable, so that even deep meaningful questions about security can be answered, helping software organizations better understand their code, engineering processes and people.

    Spirent’s revolutionary CyberFlood security and application testing solution is now available as a virtual platform offering you simplified use, by consolidating multiple test functions into a completely virtual test environment.

    Sample Customers
    NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL), Murex, Trafigura, Dell, Dropbox, Nordea, Citi, Credit Suisse
    Digicel
    Top Industries
    No Data Available
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company23%
    Financial Services Firm11%
    Comms Service Provider10%
    Manufacturing Company10%
    Company Size
    No Data Available
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business23%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise63%
    Buyer's Guide
    Application Security Tools
    May 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Sonar, Veracode, Checkmarx and others in Application Security Tools. Updated: May 2024.
    770,765 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Semmle QL is ranked 39th in Application Security Tools while Spirent CyberFlood is ranked 33rd in Application Security Tools with 4 reviews. Semmle QL is rated 0.0, while Spirent CyberFlood is rated 8.4. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Spirent CyberFlood writes "I like the solution's flexibility". Semmle QL is most compared with Fortify on Demand and Polyspace Code Prover, whereas Spirent CyberFlood is most compared with Ixia BreakingPoint and Ixia BreakingPoint VE.

    See our list of best Application Security Tools vendors.

    We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.