SemaphoreCI vs Travis CI comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
SemaphoreCI Logo
251 views|215 comparisons
Travis CI Logo
631 views|774 comparisons
0% willing to recommend
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between SemaphoreCI and Travis CI based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about GitLab, Jenkins, Google and others in Build Automation.
To learn more, read our detailed Build Automation Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Use SemaphoreCI?
Anonymous User
Ranking
23rd
out of 41 in Build Automation
Views
251
Comparisons
215
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
17th
out of 41 in Build Automation
Views
631
Comparisons
774
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Buyer's Guide
Build Automation
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about GitLab, Jenkins, Google and others in Build Automation. Updated: April 2024.
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
CircleCI logo
Compared 39% of the time.
Jenkins logo
Compared 37% of the time.
GitHub Actions logo
Compared 24% of the time.
Tekton logo
Compared 60% of the time.
GitLab logo
Compared 18% of the time.
Jenkins logo
Compared 16% of the time.
TeamCity logo
Compared 5% of the time.
Learn More
SemaphoreCI
Video Not Available
Travis CI
Video Not Available
Overview
With Semaphore, you can easily automate the process of software testing and delivery in the cloud. It is designed to be easy to use and engineered for high performance. It automatically test your app after every change, thus finding bugs before they reach your users. Whenever somebody pushes new code to GitHub or Bitbucket, Semaphore immediately runs all tests, along with any security and style checks that you’ve defined. Once you start using Semaphore, every build automatically becomes a part of the GitHub or Bitbucket pull request review process. It tests multiple projects and branches simultaneously as you push new commits. By default Semaphore automatically builds every new branch in your Git repository. Semaphore’s custom-made platform for Docker equips you with unrestricted access to latest Docker CLI toolchain, including container image caching. Safety net provided by automated CI builds: check. Next up: move even faster with continuous deployment. With a unified workflow for the entire team, Semaphore enables the team to roll-in revisions and gain feedback faster by automatically deploying verified versions of code.
Easily sync your GitHub projects with Travis CI and you'll be testing your code in minutes. Travis CI for private repositories has plans for every size project. With Travis CI testing your open source project is 100% free.
Sample Customers
Dribble, Art Sy, 500px, General Assembly, CrunchBase, Lexmark
Facebook, Heroku, Mozilla, Zendesk, twitter, Rails
Top Industries
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company27%
Financial Services Firm14%
Comms Service Provider8%
Healthcare Company8%
Company Size
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business20%
Midsize Enterprise12%
Large Enterprise68%
Buyer's Guide
Build Automation
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about GitLab, Jenkins, Google and others in Build Automation. Updated: April 2024.
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.

SemaphoreCI is ranked 23rd in Build Automation while Travis CI is ranked 17th in Build Automation. SemaphoreCI is rated 0.0, while Travis CI is rated 0.0. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Travis CI writes "Bamboo vs. Travis CI vs. Circle CI vs. Codeship". SemaphoreCI is most compared with CircleCI, Jenkins and GitHub Actions, whereas Travis CI is most compared with Tekton, GitLab, Jenkins and TeamCity.

See our list of best Build Automation vendors.

We monitor all Build Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.