Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Seismic vs StructuredWeb comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Seismic
Ranking in Channel Marketing Software
4th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
Content Marketing Software (3rd)
StructuredWeb
Ranking in Channel Marketing Software
2nd
Average Rating
10.0
Reviews Sentiment
4.8
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
Marketing Automation (7th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Channel Marketing Software category, the mindshare of Seismic is 6.5%, down from 18.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of StructuredWeb is 8.9%, down from 18.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Channel Marketing Software
 

Featured Reviews

Use Seismic?
Share your opinion
Joan Morales - PeerSpot reviewer
Improved our TCO and also helped us to provide a better experience for our partners because now everything is in the same tool
The best features in the solution include the ease of use and flexibility of the tool, and its ability to accommodate different kinds of features and needs that we always come across and need to solve for. The ability to provide content and deliver content to an international audience of channel partners is significant for us. Being able to cater to international users globally is one of the great uses of the tool. StructuredWeb can implement AI capabilities within the tool, which we have deployed, is really quite unique and very helpful. Additionally, the ability to translate content to any language with AI translation integrated as part of the tool allows one partner to access a piece of content and translate it to any language for their own use. My impression of the solution's focus on partner marketing is that it has improved our marketing efforts. We have been able to replace existing tools that we had with multiple tools. Consolidating everything in one single tool—StructuredWeb—has allowed us to save costs through the process and solve for lower management costs from our perspective. It has improved our TCO and also helped us to provide a better experience for our partners because now everything is in the same tool instead of managing two different tools that do not talk to each other easily, improving the experience for partners.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Channel Marketing Software solutions are best for your needs.
865,295 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for StructuredWeb?
The pricing and setup costs are fairly priced; it's not the cheapest tool out there, there are cheaper ones, but you are paying for what you get. If you want good support, good quality of assistanc...
What needs improvement with StructuredWeb?
Areas that may have room for improvement include continuing to evolve as AI continues to evolve; the capabilities and the use cases of how AI can be used for partners are areas they are developing....
What is your primary use case for StructuredWeb?
The use case involves providing a one-stop enablement and marketing hub for our channel partners and agency partners to access all the enablement and marketing resources materials that they need in...
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Elekta, Rockwell Automation, Hitachi, New York Life, Seagate
IBM, ServiceNow, Ingram, Veeam, Google, Zoom, Qlik, Arrow, Dell, Microsoft, TD Synnex, HPE