Qualys Patch Management vs Scalefusion comparison

Qualys and Scalefusion are both solutions in the Patch Management category. Qualys is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.9, while Scalefusion is ranked #20 with an average rating of 9.0. Qualys holds a 4.3% mindshare in PM, compared to Scalefusion’s 0.7% mindshare. Additionally, 97% of Qualys users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Scalefusion users who would recommend it.

Qualys Patch Management

Read 33 Qualys Patch Management reviews

1,166 Views
1,166 Comparison Views

97% willing to recommend

Scalefusion

Read 3 Scalefusion reviews

1,148 Views
149 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Qualys Patch Management

Scalefusion

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 16, 2024

Scalefusion and Qualys Patch Management are leading solutions in their respective fields, with Scalefusion excelling in mobility and endpoint management, while Qualys focuses on security and vulnerability management. Scalefusion’s strong points lie in its deployment and customer service, whereas Qualys has an edge in robust security features.

Features: Scalefusion is noted for comprehensive device management, easy integration, and a user-friendly interface. Qualys stands out for its strong security features, automation capabilities, and thorough vulnerability assessments.

Room for Improvement: Users of Scalefusion point out the need for better reporting capabilities, enhanced policy management, and a more intuitive dashboard. Qualys users desire improvements in patch deployment speed, a simpler system setup process, and enhanced user interface navigation.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Scalefusion is praised for its swift deployment process, minimal setup complexity, and responsive customer service. Qualys requires more complex initial setup but provides excellent support. Scalefusion takes the lead in deployment simplicity while both offer high-quality customer service.

Pricing and ROI: Scalefusion is often seen as cost-effective, offering quick returns on investment. Qualys Patch Management, though more expensive, delivers extensive features that justify the cost. For budget-conscious buyers, Scalefusion offers better immediate ROI, while Qualys provides long-term value due to its comprehensive capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed Qualys Patch Management vs. Scalefusion Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Qualys Patch Management vs. Scalefusion

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 865,384 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Qualys Patch Management

Ranking in Patch Management

4th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Scalefusion

Ranking in Patch Management

20th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Web Content Filtering (10th), Mobile Device Management (MDM) (9th), Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) (13th), Unified Endpoint Management (UEM) (12th)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Patch Management category, the mindshare of Qualys Patch Management is 4.3%, up from 1.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Scalefusion is 0.7%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Patch Management

Featured Reviews

Revathi VeeraRaghavan

Information Security - Manager at Infosys

Provides a centralized platform for managing assets and vulnerabilities, enabling assessment, prioritization, and remediation

Qualys Patch Management system requires several improvements. Firstly, the inability to download asset patches and the lack of third-party application integration limit patch accessibility. Additionally, rollback options are unreliable, and pre-deployment patch testing is crucial. Reporting needs enhancement, particularly with group-based compliance percentages and clearer, VMDR-like reporting in the Patch Management module. Furthermore, detection speed should be improved, as patches are released 24 hours after QIDs are published. The user interface could be more functional, with dashboards for patch compliance visualization and simplified error code language. Finally, the Mac patch catalogue needs expansion, and automated workflows, policy enforcement, and testing procedures should be streamlined for seamless, user-independent operation.

Read full review

Jijin Joseph

Technical Director at Channelnext

An MDM solution for controlling and restricting data on devices

Everyone is using high-end devices, such as mobile devices. If they lose their devices, how about the data copied to other devices? Once the device is lost, you can remotely delete all of the data and block the device, preventing anyone from using or reusing it. This will keep your devices secure.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Patch Management supports various software lists when compared to Microsoft Intune. It is especially beneficial for non-Microsoft applications. I can create a schedule, and various patches can be automatically deployed."

"Automated features streamline patch deployment and ensure compliance, effectively mitigating risks and bolstering organizational security."

"Patch Management's most valuable feature is the ability to search for vulnerabilities using their QID."

"Qualys Patch Management streamlines our vulnerability management process by providing a single source of truth to assess, prioritize, and remediate vulnerabilities across all assets."

"Qualys' best feature is its reporting. At first, it may seem a little complicated to a beginning user, but it's helpful once you get used to it. Most of these scans run automatically. We set the scans up for the client to run at daily, weekly, or monthly intervals, depending on how critical the server or other hardware is."

"Compared to other tools, Qualys is better due to its automation capabilities, which allow us to achieve high compliance rates."

"The first thing I would say is the ease of use."

"Qualys Patch Management offers numerous valuable features, including automatic patching for Google browsers, which allows for scheduled updates immediately upon vendor release."

More Qualys Patch Management pros

"Its enhanced support for iOS and Windows devices has been particularly beneficial, expanding our service offerings to customers with diverse device environments."

"Scalefusion is easy to use, and they have a broad knowledge base, so you can quickly find answers if you're unsure how to do something. The articles on the knowledge base are well-written, with clear steps on what to do for a specific scenario. That part is well documented."

Cons

"One area for improvement in Qualys Patch Management is knowing whether patches have been completely downloaded in a particular QGS appliance."

"They need to improve the user-friendliness of identifying how many devices are affected by a particular patch."

"There are certain integration parts that could be improved. Sometimes, legacy operating systems are not supported by Qualys Patch Management, which is an issue."

"This authentication requirement blocks some patches from being pushed through Qualys, leaving them in a locked state."

"The pricing of the solution is slightly high compared to other tools in our field."

"Qualys could improve its capacity to fix vulnerabilities on VMware and other virtualized environments. The reporting could also be enhanced to make it more user-friendly. It's difficult for beginners to learn."

"Currently, there are limitations in downloading patch jobs to view all associated assets and patch statuses."

"The Qualys agent sometimes encounters authorization issues, leading to inaccurate vulnerability reports."

More Qualys Patch Management cons

"It could be easier to put devices on the blocklist. I would like the ability to block a device with a click of a button. Currently, we have to sift through different groups to block a device. It would be nice if Scalefusion allowed me to block without moving the device to a different profile. Another helpful feature they could add is the ability to migrate from one MDM to another. I'd also appreciate more extensive cloud storage. They give you 1 GB by default, but sometimes that's not enough."

"One area for improvement could be streamlining permissions during initial device setup, especially for corporate-owned devices, to reduce manual user interaction and expedite deployment."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Qualys Patch Management offers a moderate price point, neither cheap nor expensive, considering its comprehensive functionality."

"Pricing for Qualys Patch Management is moderate."

"Qualys is fairly priced."

"The pricing is fair and within our budget."

"Compared to other tools, the price of Qualys Patch Management is reasonable."

"Qualys Patch Management comes as part of a bundled package with several modules, making it a cost-effective deal for us."

"Qualys Patch Management is expensive."

"The pricing is reasonable and less expensive than the previous tool."

More Qualys Patch Management pricing and cost advice

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Patch Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

12%

Government

12%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Computer Software Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Qualys Patch Management?

From a pricing perspective, I find Qualys to be a bit higher, but it is worth it. Compared to other tools, it is on the costly side, but I believe it is worth the investment.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Qualys Patch Management?

Regarding improvements in Qualys Patch Management, I did not quite understand the downsides they were expecting. Initially, I was confused about where to find and how to use the available features....

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Qualys Patch Management?

I am using Qualys Patch Management for two years, and everything is satisfactory from my side. Before purchasing Qualys Patch Management, we were already using Qualys VMDR and the cloud agent model...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Scalefusion?

One area for improvement could be streamlining permissions during initial device setup, especially for corporate-owned devices, to reduce manual user interaction and expedite deployment.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Scalefusion?

Our typical use cases for the product involve auto-enrollment, zero-touch deployment, location tracking, application deployment, auto-installation, and content deployment across various device type...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Scalefusion?

In terms of device management, the platform is particularly effective for managing Android devices, especially Samsung, which are predominant among our customers. Its enhanced support for iOS and W...

See all answers

Comparisons

BigFix vs Qualys Patch Management

Compared 17% of the time

Microsoft Configuration Manager vs Qualys Patch Management

Compared 13% of the time

Patch My PC vs Qualys Patch Management

Compared 13% of the time

ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus vs Qualys Patch Management

Compared 11% of the time

Ivanti Security Controls vs Qualys Patch Management

Compared 10% of the time

More Qualys Patch Management Competitors

JumpCloud vs Scalefusion

Compared 29% of the time

Microsoft Intune vs Scalefusion

Compared 22% of the time

Workspace ONE UEM vs Scalefusion

Compared 13% of the time

42Gears SureMDM vs Scalefusion

Compared 10% of the time

ManageEngine Endpoint Central vs Scalefusion

Compared 8% of the time

More Scalefusion Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Qualys Patch Management

August 2025

Download Qualys Patch Management product report

Buyer's Guide

Mobile Device Management (MDM)

August 2025

Download Scalefusion product report

Overview

Qualys Patch Management optimizes patching and vulnerability remediation through automation and intelligence insights, accelerating the process by 43% and improving patch rates by 90%. Its integration with CMDB and ITSM tools speeds up ticket closures by 60%, effectively reducing the attack surface while freeing IT and security resources. This cloud-based solution bridges the IT-security gap, making it essential for cybersecurity.

Qualys

Scalefusion is a leading Mobile Device & Endpoint Management software helping businesses globally to secure and manage their device fleet.

Ambitious companies around the world trust Scalefusion MDM to secure and manage endpoints including smartphones, tablets, laptops, rugged devices, POS, and digital signages. Our mission is to make Device Management simple and effortless along with providing world-class customer support.

Scalefusion

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Magna, Scania, Darya - Varia, Radisson Blu, Slice, Veezu

Buyer's Guide

Qualys Patch Management vs. Scalefusion

July 2025

Free Report: Qualys Patch Management vs. Scalefusion

Find out what your peers are saying about Qualys Patch Management vs. Scalefusion and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Qualys Patch Management vs. Scalefusion report.

See our list of best Patch Management vendors.

We monitor all Patch Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.