Qualys Patch Management vs Scalefusion comparison

Qualys and Scalefusion are both solutions in the Patch Management category. Qualys is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.9, while Scalefusion is ranked #19 with an average rating of 9.0. Qualys holds a 4.5% mindshare in PM, compared to Scalefusion’s 0.6% mindshare. Additionally, 97% of Qualys users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Scalefusion users who would recommend it.

Qualys Patch Management

Read 34 Qualys Patch Management reviews

984 Views
209 Comparison Views

97% willing to recommend

Scalefusion

Read 3 Scalefusion reviews

120 Views
16 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Qualys Patch Management

Scalefusion

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 16, 2024

Scalefusion and Qualys Patch Management are leading solutions in their respective fields, with Scalefusion excelling in mobility and endpoint management, while Qualys focuses on security and vulnerability management. Scalefusion’s strong points lie in its deployment and customer service, whereas Qualys has an edge in robust security features.

Features: Scalefusion is noted for comprehensive device management, easy integration, and a user-friendly interface. Qualys stands out for its strong security features, automation capabilities, and thorough vulnerability assessments.

Room for Improvement: Users of Scalefusion point out the need for better reporting capabilities, enhanced policy management, and a more intuitive dashboard. Qualys users desire improvements in patch deployment speed, a simpler system setup process, and enhanced user interface navigation.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Scalefusion is praised for its swift deployment process, minimal setup complexity, and responsive customer service. Qualys requires more complex initial setup but provides excellent support. Scalefusion takes the lead in deployment simplicity while both offer high-quality customer service.

Pricing and ROI: Scalefusion is often seen as cost-effective, offering quick returns on investment. Qualys Patch Management, though more expensive, delivers extensive features that justify the cost. For budget-conscious buyers, Scalefusion offers better immediate ROI, while Qualys provides long-term value due to its comprehensive capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed Qualys Patch Management vs. Scalefusion Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Qualys Patch Management vs. Scalefusion

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 857,162 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Qualys Patch Management

Ranking in Patch Management

4th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Scalefusion

Ranking in Patch Management

19th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Web Content Filtering (9th), Mobile Device Management (MDM) (10th), Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) (12th), Unified Endpoint Management (UEM) (10th)

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Patch Management category, the mindshare of Qualys Patch Management is 4.5%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Scalefusion is 0.6%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Patch Management

Featured Reviews

Revathi VeeraRaghavan

Information Security - Manager at Infosys

Provides a centralized platform for managing assets and vulnerabilities, enabling assessment, prioritization, and remediation

Qualys Patch Management system requires several improvements. Firstly, the inability to download asset patches and the lack of third-party application integration limit patch accessibility. Additionally, rollback options are unreliable, and pre-deployment patch testing is crucial. Reporting needs enhancement, particularly with group-based compliance percentages and clearer, VMDR-like reporting in the Patch Management module. Furthermore, detection speed should be improved, as patches are released 24 hours after QIDs are published. The user interface could be more functional, with dashboards for patch compliance visualization and simplified error code language. Finally, the Mac patch catalogue needs expansion, and automated workflows, policy enforcement, and testing procedures should be streamlined for seamless, user-independent operation.

Read full review

Jijin Joseph

Technical Director at Channelnext

An MDM solution for controlling and restricting data on devices

Everyone is using high-end devices, such as mobile devices. If they lose their devices, how about the data copied to other devices? Once the device is lost, you can remotely delete all of the data and block the device, preventing anyone from using or reusing it. This will keep your devices secure.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Patch Management's most valuable feature is the ability to search for vulnerabilities using their QID."

"Automated features streamline patch deployment and ensure compliance, effectively mitigating risks and bolstering organizational security."

"We can update the registry with special features such as Registry Update. We can also run scripts via the Patch Management module. These features are very helpful in our operations."

"Qualys Patch Management helps reduce our client's organizational risk by 50 percent."

"Qualys Patch Management has significantly reduced our organizational risks."

"Patch Management offers pre-action and post-action features, which provide the ability to execute scripts during the installation or uninstallation of software. This helps me make changes from Qualys itself."

"The organization's risk score has significantly improved since integrating with Qualys Patch Management."

"We have seen about 60% to 70% improvement in the patch rate so far."

More Qualys Patch Management pros

"Scalefusion is easy to use, and they have a broad knowledge base, so you can quickly find answers if you're unsure how to do something. The articles on the knowledge base are well-written, with clear steps on what to do for a specific scenario. That part is well documented."

"Its enhanced support for iOS and Windows devices has been particularly beneficial, expanding our service offerings to customers with diverse device environments."

Cons

"Qualys's current response time for releasing solutions to zero-day vulnerabilities, which takes approximately 12 to 16 hours, needs improvement."

"One of the challenges that we have faced with the Patch Management tool is that you cannot patch all the things. There are some limitations, whereas, in SCCM, we can create a package and just deploy that through it. Anything is deployable through SCCM, whereas Patch Management is very selective."

"They need to improve the user-friendliness of identifying how many devices are affected by a particular patch. It is not intuitive, and there should be clearer indicators or buttons to access this information easily."

"It is pretty good. However, it would be good to have more widgets and AI-generated reports. I have not seen anything related to AI with Qualys. It would be beneficial for Qualys to incorporate AI-generated tools for Patch Management and VMDR. This could assist in managing risks, providing AI-generated reports, and creating risk letters for clients, which can streamline communication."

"False positives were the biggest concern."

"The Qualys agent sometimes encounters authorization issues, leading to inaccurate vulnerability reports."

"Sometimes, legacy operating systems are not supported by Qualys Patch Management, which is an issue."

"There is a limitation where Qualys may not always offer solutions for remediation, particularly for end-of-life or end-of-service applications."

More Qualys Patch Management cons

"One area for improvement could be streamlining permissions during initial device setup, especially for corporate-owned devices, to reduce manual user interaction and expedite deployment."

"It could be easier to put devices on the blocklist. I would like the ability to block a device with a click of a button. Currently, we have to sift through different groups to block a device. It would be nice if Scalefusion allowed me to block without moving the device to a different profile. Another helpful feature they could add is the ability to migrate from one MDM to another. I'd also appreciate more extensive cloud storage. They give you 1 GB by default, but sometimes that's not enough."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Its price is competitive in the market. Compared to other solutions like Rapid7, Qualys offers a favorable price point and robust features."

"Pricing for Qualys Patch Management is moderate."

"The pricing is fair and within our budget."

"Qualys Patch Management offers a moderate price point, neither cheap nor expensive, considering its comprehensive functionality."

"The pricing is reasonable and competitive. We get many more features at the same price compared to other solutions such as Microsoft SCCM. It is worth the money considering the services and features it has. Their support team is also awesome."

"While the cost of Qualys Patch Management is slightly high compared to alternative tools, it is not excessively expensive."

"Qualys Patch Management is expensive."

"I'm unaware of Qualys' exact price, but it's more expensive than Nessus. With technological products, you need to pay to get the best."

More Qualys Patch Management pricing and cost advice

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Patch Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

857,162 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

15%

Government

13%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Educational Organization

15%

Computer Software Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Qualys Patch Management?

From a pricing perspective, I find Qualys to be a bit higher, but it is worth it. Compared to other tools, it is on the costly side, but I believe it is worth the investment.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Qualys Patch Management?

Regarding improvements in Qualys Patch Management, I did not quite understand the downsides they were expecting. Initially, I was confused about where to find and how to use the available features....

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Qualys Patch Management?

I am using Qualys Patch Management for two years, and everything is satisfactory from my side. Before purchasing Qualys Patch Management, we were already using Qualys VMDR and the cloud agent model...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Scalefusion?

One area for improvement could be streamlining permissions during initial device setup, especially for corporate-owned devices, to reduce manual user interaction and expedite deployment.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Scalefusion?

Our typical use cases for the product involve auto-enrollment, zero-touch deployment, location tracking, application deployment, auto-installation, and content deployment across various device type...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Scalefusion?

In terms of device management, the platform is particularly effective for managing Android devices, especially Samsung, which are predominant among our customers. Its enhanced support for iOS and W...

See all answers

Comparisons

BigFix vs Qualys Patch Management

Compared 20% of the time

Microsoft Configuration Manager vs Qualys Patch Management

Compared 14% of the time

Ivanti Security Controls vs Qualys Patch Management

Compared 13% of the time

Patch My PC vs Qualys Patch Management

Compared 12% of the time

ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus vs Qualys Patch Management

Compared 10% of the time

More Qualys Patch Management Competitors

JumpCloud vs Scalefusion

Compared 32% of the time

Microsoft Intune vs Scalefusion

Compared 21% of the time

Workspace ONE UEM vs Scalefusion

Compared 11% of the time

42Gears SureMDM vs Scalefusion

Compared 9% of the time

ManageEngine Endpoint Central vs Scalefusion

Compared 9% of the time

More Scalefusion Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Qualys Patch Management

May 2025

Download Qualys Patch Management product report

Buyer's Guide

Mobile Device Management (MDM)

May 2025

Download Scalefusion product report

Overview

Qualys Patch Management optimizes patching and vulnerability remediation through automation and intelligence insights, accelerating the process by 43% and improving patch rates by 90%. Its integration with CMDB and ITSM tools speeds up ticket closures by 60%, effectively reducing the attack surface while freeing IT and security resources. This cloud-based solution bridges the IT-security gap, making it essential for cybersecurity.

Qualys

Scalefusion is a leading Mobile Device & Endpoint Management software helping businesses globally to secure and manage their device fleet.

Ambitious companies around the world trust Scalefusion MDM to secure and manage endpoints including smartphones, tablets, laptops, rugged devices, POS, and digital signages. Our mission is to make Device Management simple and effortless along with providing world-class customer support.

Scalefusion

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Magna, Scania, Darya - Varia, Radisson Blu, Slice, Veezu

Buyer's Guide

Qualys Patch Management vs. Scalefusion

June 2025

Free Report: Qualys Patch Management vs. Scalefusion

Find out what your peers are saying about Qualys Patch Management vs. Scalefusion and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

857,162 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Qualys Patch Management vs. Scalefusion report.

See our list of best Patch Management vendors.

We monitor all Patch Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.