Prometheus Group vs Stackify comparison

Prometheus Group and Stackify are both solutions in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category. Prometheus Group is ranked #10 with an average rating of 8.4, while Stackify is ranked #61. Prometheus Group holds a 2.9% mindshare in APM, compared to Stackify’s 0.2% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Prometheus Group users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 71% of Stackify users who would recommend it.

Prometheus Group

Read 34 Prometheus Group reviews

5,321 Views
5,268 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Stackify

Read 6 Stackify reviews

822 Views
477 Comparison Views

71% willing to recommend

Prometheus Group

Stackify

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 8, 2025

Stackify and Prometheus Group are competitors in software performance management and operational maintenance. Stackify has the upper hand in delivering affordable solutions with high customer satisfaction due to its comprehensive support and pricing, whereas Prometheus Group's robust feature set justifies its higher cost for those requiring extensive operational capabilities.

Features: Stackify offers application performance monitoring, real user monitoring, and centralized logging, making it suitable for performance diagnostics. Prometheus Group provides advanced asset management, predictive maintenance, and reliability management, which caters to enterprise-level operational and maintenance needs.

Room for Improvement: Stackify could enhance its deployment options for more complex environments and integrate with a wider range of enterprise systems. It might also expand its support and diagnostic features for larger infrastructures. Prometheus Group could improve on lowering initial setup complexity, offering more flexible pricing options, and simplifying integration processes to enhance user accessibility.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Stackify supports cloud-based deployment, allowing for swift and simple setup with responsive customer service that enhances user experience. Prometheus Group's deployment model, while more complex and designed for integration with enterprise systems, benefits from extensive support resources that guide users through processes effectively.

Pricing and ROI: Stackify is viewed as cost-effective with a transparent pricing model, resulting in a quick return on investment from its easy setup and streamlined usage. Prometheus Group, despite its higher initial costs, offers potential for greater long-term ROI through its comprehensive feature set, making it a high-cost but impactful solution for larger operations.

To learn more, read our detailed Prometheus Group vs. Stackify Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Prometheus Group vs. Stackify

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 865,484 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Prometheus Group

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

10th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Stackify

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

61st

Average Rating

7.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

IT Infrastructure Monitoring (59th), Log Management (61st)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category, the mindshare of Prometheus Group is 2.9%, down from 3.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Stackify is 0.2%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

Featured Reviews

MuhammadAzhar Khan

Senior DevOps Engineer at Alibaba Group

Free to use and provides valuable monitoring capabilities

Prometheus is a scalable and flexible tool that I can deploy on any cloud platform. It is free to use and provides valuable monitoring capabilities. It allows me to save money by avoiding costs associated with AWS native services like CloudWatch or Amazon Prometheus. The ability to deploy on any cloud platform or environment, including Kubernetes, is a major advantage.

Read full review

Kalyan Somisetty

Senior Developer at PRESIS KONSULT

Simple, easy to configure, and offers trial versions

In the next version, which I want to try, it'll show the comparison of the old responses of the APS. For example, how much time the old response and the new response with the changes. Right now, I cannot differentiate. The graphical interface should be able to capture nicely how much time it has taken and it should be very clear. Sometimes it confuses us. For example, what is this APA for? What were the average responses and how many requests have happened? It needs to give a clear picture. They should enable request and response capturing in the Stackify user interface to show what the request for the APA is. Then, it'll be very good. It should be able to capture the payload. For example, what is the request and what is the response? If it has a nice way of capturing everything then it would be easy. There is no need of using ELK again for logging. As of now, people will use Stackify or maybe Grafana for seeing the stats of the application or responses, however, it doesn't have the capabilities to show everything. People will go for any exception handling or checking the request and response in the ELK. If Stackify can do this future, then it'll be an easier single tool. It is anyway intercepting the logs, application logs. I don't think it's a big matter to capture extra data with the requested response. That requested response capturing also should be configurable since some people want the question response to be captured and for the people that don't want it, we can use that feature. It can be enabled as desired. Many people are using different monitoring tools like ELK, LogStash, and Splunk - many other tools. However, if you can make this kind of performance tool cover everything, then they will not shift to other solutions. It should be easily scalable and configurable in different instances. For example, if the same application is scaled up to differently, it should be easily integrable into Kubernetes pipelines. They should offer plugins to make it more easily integratable. For development enrollment, it should be free to use.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The dashboard is very valuable."

"The most valuable features of Prometheus are the many functions available. The functions are helpful for understanding the behavior of applications and infrastructure."

"The most valuable features of Prometheus for metrics collection and monitoring are its stability, robustness, and rich set of features."

"Prometheus is an open-source product that helps mold and improve it per our requirements. It is a lightweight solution that gives you many different metrics you can use in your application. The product offers complete granularity of your infrastructure. It integrates seamlessly with other tools like Grafana, which offers dashboard visibility. Prometheus is an extensively used product. I haven't seen any organization that is not using it."

"It lets me proactively identify and resolve system issues. This, in terms of, most of the time, really reduces downtime. Because when there are notifications on time when we engage it quickly on time, our downtime is highly reduced. So basically, Prometheus is for monitoring and alerting."

"The product is easy to maintain."

"The solution helps us to scale our products and services, and it helps me by gathering those metrics."

"The sky is the limit because the solution is a flexible open box that can be used vastly to do anything you need to monitor applications."

More Prometheus Group pros

"The deployment is very fast."

"The filter feature on Stackify is one of the features I found valuable. It's awesome. When I want to get the application logs, the solution gives me many filters. For example, if I want to get logs from my test environment, the option is there for me to select the environment from Stackify, and you can also select the particular application, and you'll see the information you need there. The filter feature alone and the fact that Stackify offers a lot of different filters is what I like the most about the solution because I've used other tools with the filter feature, but the filtering was very difficult, versus Stackify that has good filtering. On Stackify, you can filter the information by the last one hour, or the last four hours, and you can also select the date range and specify the timestamp, then the solution will give you the information based on the date range you specified. Another feature I found valuable on Stackify is its rating feature because it tells you how your application is faring. For example, a rating of A means excellent, while a rating of F means very bad, or that your application is not doing well at all. The ratings are from A to F. I also like that Stackify helps you in terms of load management because the solution gives you information on overutilized resources. These are the most valuable features of the solution."

"The solution is stable and reliable."

"The performance dashboard and the accurate level of details are beneficial."

Cons

"The UI and GUI are areas of concern in the product."

"Lacks the ability to clusterize."

"One potential area for improvement would be fixing the occasional glitches and bugs."

"There is a need for a more comprehensive overview of exporters, especially when dealing with many of them."

"Setting up the rules in Prometheus can be confusing, making it an area where improvements are required."

"Its stability could be even better."

"If you want to collect details of metrics, you should be able to write a query for it directly. I want the product to offer better queries for the metrics."

"The simplicity of the query language could be improved. The current query language is not easy to work with."

More Prometheus Group cons

"I've not used Stackify for a while, and I'm currently using a solution now that's not as good as Stackify. Among the solutions I've been using so far, Stackify has been one of the best for me, but there's always room for improvement. For example, I don't know if it's just me, but when I try to get the log from Stackify, sometimes it doesn't appear in real-time. It takes a few minutes before the logs appear. When I redeploy my solution and the application starts, I don't see the logs immediately, and it would take two to three minutes before I see the logs. I don't know if other customers have a similar experience. It's the wait time for the logs to appear that's a concern for me, could be improved, and is what the Stackify team should be looking into. In terms of any additional feature that I'd like added to the solution, I'm not sure if Stackify has a way to export logs out. I've been trying to do it. On the solution, you can click on a spiral-like icon and it shows you the entire error, and I'd prefer an export button that would let me download the error and save that into a text file, for example, so it'll be available on my local machine for me to reference it, especially because the log keeps going and as you're using the solution, the system keeps pushing messages on to Stackify, so if I'm looking at a particular error at 12:05 PM, for example, by the time I go back to my system and would like to revisit the error at 12:25 PM, on Stackify, the logs would have gone past that level and I won't see it again which makes it difficult. When you now go back to that timestamp, you don't tend to see it immediately, but if the solution had an export feature for me to save that particular error information on my local machine for reference at a later time, I won't have to go back to Stackify. I just go to that log, specifically to that particular export that I've received on my local machine. I can get it and review it, and it would be easier that way versus me going back to Stackify to find that particular error and request that particular information."

"The search feature could be improved."

"It should be easily scalable and configurable in different instances."

"I would like to be able to see metrics about individual running containers on the host machines."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Prometheus is an open-source tool."

"The solution is open source."

"We use the solution's open-source version."

"The product is expensive compared to Datadog."

"The solution is free of cost."

"The tool is open-sourced."

"The price of Prometheus is good, it is affordable because it is open source and there is no cost to it. You put it on your own server and the costs incurred completely depend on how you set it up."

"Prometheus is an open-source solution."

More Prometheus Group pricing and cost advice

"The price is variable. It depends on how much data we have received in that particular month. Usually, it goes up to $2,000, or, at times, $3,000 USD per month."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,484 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

23%

Computer Software Company

14%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Financial Services Firm

15%

Computer Software Company

Media Company

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Prometheus?

The most valuable feature of Prometheus is its ability to collect metrics.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Prometheus?

Prometheus is cost-effective for me as it is free. Using cloud-native alternatives like Amazon Prometheus would incur charges.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Prometheus?

I use Prometheus for monitoring purposes in IT infrastructure. It is particularly useful for environments using Kubernetes, as it monitors ports, containers, instances, and applications effectively.

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Zabbix vs Prometheus Group

Compared 12% of the time

Azure Monitor vs Prometheus Group

Compared 9% of the time

Dynatrace vs Prometheus Group

Compared 8% of the time

Apache SkyWalking vs Prometheus Group

Compared 7% of the time

Sentry vs Prometheus Group

Compared 7% of the time

More Prometheus Group Competitors

New Relic vs Stackify

Compared 46% of the time

Dynatrace vs Stackify

Compared 32% of the time

Splunk Enterprise Security vs Stackify

Compared 22% of the time

More Stackify Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Prometheus Group

August 2025

Download Prometheus Group product report

Buyer's Guide

Stackify

July 2025

Download Stackify product report

Overview

Prometheus Group specializes in robust monitoring and observability, offering comprehensive data collection, analysis, and visualization across cloud and on-premise environments. Its integration with tools like Python, Java, and Kubernetes enables users to track metrics efficiently.

Prometheus Group provides an open-source, customizable platform focused on flexibility and reliability. Its integration with Grafana enhances data visualization while supporting complex infrastructures for improved productivity. Users rely on its scalable architecture for effective monitoring and observability, aiding performance analytics and alerting. Despite its strengths, challenges with its query language and interface usability persist, along with a need for simpler setup. Enhancing documentation and reporting capabilities remains essential for broader adoption, especially among less technical users.

What are the standout features of Prometheus Group?

Integration with Python, Java, and Kubernetes: Provides seamless metric collection and analysis.
Log Comparison Dashboard: Enables efficient comparison for better insights.
Flexible Exporters: Gathers diverse data for comprehensive monitoring.
Lightweight Configuration: Ensures easy deployment and management.
Grafana Integration: Facilitates advanced data visualization.

What benefits or ROI should users expect?

Scalability: Adapts to rapidly changing environments and infrastructure demands.
Community Support: Benefits from continuous open-source community improvements.
Enhanced Productivity: Improves system performance analytics and alerting efficiency.
Comprehensive Monitoring: Provides detailed insights into server health and resource usage.

Prometheus Group is widely implemented across industries like cloud services and IT infrastructure. Organizations monitor infrastructure, applications, and databases, utilizing its capabilities for system scalability and health checks within Azure and Amazon ecosystems. Its integration with Kubernetes supports performance monitoring and ensures reliable data analytics, fostering comprehensive metric tracking.

Prometheus Group

Stackify is an application performance management (APM) solution that combines application performance monitoring with logs, errors, and reporting. It is a SaaS solution that is developer-focused. Users can quickly scan, identify, and repair issues with applications. Stackify APM offers valuable tools, such as Prefix and Retrace, which help to make it a comprehensive and valuable APM solution. Stackify is now part of the Netreo family of IT Infrastructure Management (ITIM), which is considered one of the fastest-growing IT organizations in the marketplace today.

Stackify Prefix

Stackify Prefix helps developers write better code, faster. The tool examines, tests, and approves code as it is being written. Almost every new application is code-perfect, negating the need for exhausting troubleshooting and frustrating time-consuming code review.

Prefix is able to discover poor-performing SQL queries, ORM queries, potential bottlenecks, and concealed exceptions prior to moving the application into production.

Prefix offers Summary Dashboards, intuitive suggestions, integrated logs, and distributed tracing. Distributed tracing expands visibility to cloud-native applications, microservices, and containers and can also provide additional transparency to cache services, web services, third-party services, and more. Users are able to easily move from logs to traces and back.

This valuable tool ensures developers are able to consistently release the best code possible in the least amount of time, while improving performance, productivity, and profitability.

Prefix is a very robust and easy-to-use tool. It can be used seamlessly with Linux, macOS, and Windows. Prefix integrates well with numerous languages, such as Java, Python, Ruby, PHP, Node.js, .Net, and .Net Core.

Stackify Retrace

Stackify Retrace is a user-friendly, trusted APM solution used in more than fifty countries worldwide. Users know that Retrace is able to ensure they can complete quicker, more efficient application development and consistently enhance overall application performance by suggesting important intuitive suggestions users need.

This solution is beneficial to both developers (Dev) and operations (Ops) personnel to learn to improve code and immediately finetune issues by:

Establishing effortless collaboration between Dev and Ops personnel via an easy-to-use GUI dashboard.
Delivering complete transparency of all stages of the application development process, from pre-development to production.
Utilizing performance protocols, such as error tracking, application logs, and code profiling, in real time in order to thoroughly understand how long a code will take to complete various tasks.
Improving overall efficiency and productivity by immediately discovering and repairing application issues.

Retrace Real User Monitoring (RUM) uses both front-end and back-end monitoring to give users a complete picture of what is going on with the applications. This intuitive dashboard displays performance with a complete breakdown of resource usage and integrates the server-side and client traces into one engaging, user-friendly, extensive view.

Retrace is an out-of-the-box solution that works seamlessly with Java stacks, PHP, Node.js, Ruby, Python, .Net, and .Net Core. It is also compatible with many of today’s popular frameworks, such as AWS, Azure, Elasticsearch, MongoDB, MySQL, Oracle, PostgreSQL, Redis, and SQL Server. Additionally, Retrace will work effectively with many cloud providers, containers, and languages, and offers excellent and easy integration with today's favorite tools such as Jira, Slack, Jenkins, and more.

Stackify

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

MyRacePass, ClearSale, Newitts, Carbonite, Boston Software, Children's International, Starkwood Media Group, Fewzion

Buyer's Guide

Prometheus Group vs. Stackify

July 2025

Free Report: Prometheus Group vs. Stackify

Find out what your peers are saying about Prometheus Group vs. Stackify and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

865,484 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Prometheus Group vs. Stackify report.

See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.

We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.