Foglight for Databases vs Oracle Essbase comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Quest Software and Oracle are both solutions in the Database Development and Management category. Quest Software is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.5, while Oracle is ranked #17 with an average rating of 7.3. Quest Software holds a 3.6% mindshare in DDM, compared to Oracle’s 1.5% mindshare. Additionally, 96% of Quest Software users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Oracle users who would recommend it.

Foglight for Databases

Read 24 Foglight for Databases reviews

4,479 Views
4,434 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

Oracle Essbase

Read 18 Oracle Essbase reviews

3,299 Views
990 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Foglight for Databases

Oracle Essbase

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 3, 2026

Oracle Essbase and Foglight for Databases are strong contenders in business analytics and database management spheres. While Oracle Essbase excels with its multidimensional database engines suited for complex analytical tasks, Foglight for Databases has the edge with its advanced monitoring tools, making it a preferred choice for organizations focusing on performance monitoring.

Features: Oracle Essbase boasts high-speed data processing and robust calculation engines, supporting intricate analytical queries with ease. Its multi-dimensionality enables complex data modeling useful for financial analyses. Additionally, aggregate storage applications facilitate swift, large-scale data handling. Foglight for Databases provides comprehensive performance monitoring across multiple database environments, allowing real-time tracking of system health. Its cross-platform flexibility supports various databases, enhancing system efficiency and minimal downtime. It also offers historical performance insights for database management improvement.

Room for Improvement: Oracle Essbase could enhance user interface design to make complex operations more intuitive and accessible to non-technical users. Increasing automation for database management tasks and refining cloud integration capabilities would improve overall usability. On the other hand, Foglight for Databases could benefit from optimizing the report generation process to streamline user interaction. Enhancing real-time data visualization features and broader custom scripting support would also help address complex user requirements.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Deploying Oracle Essbase requires comprehensive planning due to its advanced features, but is well-supported with rich documentation and dedicated support services. Foglight for Databases offers a smoother setup with efficient configuration processes and proactive customer engagement, ensuring a well-supported experience designed for quick scalability.

Pricing and ROI: Oracle Essbase has higher initial setup costs but provides considerable long-term value due to its extensive analytical features and performance metrics. Foglight for Databases offers a moderate investment level with significant ROI benefits stemming from enhanced monitoring capabilities and reduced system downtime, providing a cost-effective advantage, particularly for performance-focused organizations.

To learn more, read our detailed Foglight for Databases vs. Oracle Essbase Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Foglight for Databases vs. Oracle Essbase

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 914,394 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Foglight for Databases

Ranking in Database Development and Management

1st

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Oracle Essbase

Ranking in Database Development and Management

17th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

4.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2026, in the Database Development and Management category, the mindshare of Foglight for Databases is 3.6%, down from 5.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Oracle Essbase is 1.5%, up from 0.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Database Development and Management Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Foglight for Databases	3.6%
Oracle Essbase	1.5%
Other	94.9%

Database Development and Management

Featured Reviews

AkshayChaudhari

Data specialist at TCS

Centralized monitoring has reduced troubleshooting time and improves visibility across databases

I would improve the user interface of Foglight for Databases, as I feel it is somewhat complex, especially when using the specific troubleshooting view, particularly for new users. I would also appreciate more flexibility when customizing the dashboards and alerts, so better prioritization based on impact would be beneficial. Reporting could also be more straightforward with more ready-made reports and easier customization. Clearer recommendations during troubleshooting would help users move from identifying a problem to understanding the likely root cause. There is still room for improvement in the user interface, reporting, and alert customization, but overall Foglight for Databases has been valuable.

Read full review

Bhavya N

Senior System Engineer at Infosys

Ensuring efficient data analysis and reporting while identifying areas for calculation and export improvements

The features of Oracle Essbase are valuable, such as its multi-dimensional database used for dynamic calculations and reporting purposes. These features are valuable because they support multi-dimensional data views, allowing users to analyze relationships across various data categories and establish a comprehensive perspective on business operations. Moreover, dynamic calculations allow real-time data analysis, significantly improving the accuracy and depth of financial insights. I have utilized Essbase's data aggregation capabilities. The Oracle Essbase interface provides a good user experience, allowing users to easily navigate and analyze data with fast query performance, effective data visualization tools such as charts, graphs, and tables, and flexibility for customizable analysis and reporting, including the ability to create ad hoc reports. The benefits of the interface include improving productivity and enhancing decision-making.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"For me, one of the most useful components has been Performance Investigator, because it completely helps with bottlenecks or performance problems quickly, evaluating whether the root is at the server level, at the development level, or at the database level."

"It enables you to pin down troubleshooting within 30 minutes to an hour, whereas before, you'd be pouring over reports or data from queries for days."

"The PI module allows [my colleague] to identify which new indexes or modified indexes are going to make the biggest impact."

"Foglight is also able to help the DBAs proactively fix problems before they become an issue. It provides them with real-time activity screens that help in this regard. The DBAs are able to go to these screens and look at what's happening in real time, and that buys them time. It helps them see problems ahead of time and find solutions to them."

"We went from basically 30% coverage of our production environment to 100% coverage."

"The most valuable feature is the in-depth capability SQL Performance Investigator provides. It allows you to drill down to the smallest detail that occurs on our platform. It does a highly detailed and atomic follow-up of what one wants to look for in relation to time and our different instances."

"We can visualize all the different types of DB servers that we are monitoring in a single pane of glass. It uses a 360-degree overview of the database, for each of those databases that we are monitoring. That includes what kind of resource utilization is happening and what kind of DB parameters are getting monitored, as well as the different types of DB parameters that are being offered for each database type."

"My impressions of Foglight for Databases' ability to help me monitor a variety of aspects such as the OS, hybrid clouds, hardware, and databases across different platforms have been great so far."

More Foglight for Databases pros

"Essbase is a powerful tool that continues to provide value for companies."

"Its multidimensional analysis is great; unlike relational, where you're linking together multiple tables, with Essbase, you basically define what the dimensions are beforehand, and you define the hierarchy, and then load the data, allowing you to do sophisticated analysis so that you can drill into it and slice and dice the data."

"Essbase is extremely stable and low-maintenance."

"The Oracle Essbase interface provides a good user experience, allowing users to easily navigate and analyze data with fast query performance, effective data visualization tools such as charts, graphs, and tables, and flexibility for customizable analysis and reporting, including the ability to create ad hoc reports."

"It provides for faster and more assertive forecast cycles and enables businesses to improve their process since with this tool, you can do things easily and quicker as the business can create more complex models than were possible before."

"I have found the most valuable aspect is the user-friendly environment and current features."

"It's a very powerful analytical engine with Essbase as the back end. We can analyze, transform, or utilize a big chunk of data for our calculations."

"Oracle Essbase is a web integration system that integrates with other data systems."

More Oracle Essbase pros

Cons

"The version that I'm using is not the latest version, so there might have been some improvement, but the OS monitoring is a bit lacking, and the high-availability option is a bit complicated to set up and it doesn't work all the time."

"Overall, I am happy with the product, but there are a few areas where it could be improved."

"The tool could be somewhat more user-friendly, as proper knowledge is required to set up servers and use it effectively."

"Foglight for Databases could benefit from fewer generic alerts and more rules based on impact, priority, and action path, which would make it more useful for daily operations, on-call shifts, and incident follow-up."

"Better communication and alerts regarding the transaction logs getting full would also be beneficial. What I have noticed is that if the log files on the SQL server are full, we cannot log in and have to do some cleanup on the Foglight DB. It would be good if they could monitor that and alert us when it is getting too full."

"When we decided to go with Foglight, a lot of people stopped using the diagnostics part because it was very intimidating... They still won't use it because they feel it's too intimidating. They will open something up and not know what to do. It's not very user-friendly. You have to click on a lot of stuff to find the information."

"I would like the rule development code to be made available so we don't always have to be referred to professional services for custom solutions. For example, if we want to exclude certain databases from a particular rule, we shouldn't have to go to support and to professional services for that solution. If the code and syntax were available, we have resources that could quickly turn something like that around."

"The monitoring capabilities for Postgres should be at par with SQL Server. This is the area where we push back on our Quest representative. We want more insights into Postgres."

More Foglight for Databases cons

"The consolidation engine, which is HFM or FCCS, needs some room for improvement."

"I find managing the database difficult, especially regarding optimization and data storage with the huge volume of data."

"The ability to drive external reporting out for development could be improved."

"I would like to improve calculations by optimizing performance and reducing processing time."

"There is room for improvement in terms of cost-effectiveness."

"The solution could enhance business analytics. I delved into the data using Oracle Essbase to create a new support tool."

"The licensing costs are too high."

"The solution could be cheaper. It is costly, and the initial setup could be simplified."

More Oracle Essbase cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is cost-effective. With our EA, it is really based on the scale of our database environment. We found the Quest team to be reasonable and flexible when it comes to pricing and scaling of licenses."

"This is like the "Cadillac" of performance monitoring software. It's not cheap... I am currently with a company that I was able to convince that the product is worth the cost."

"The price of Foglight could be a little more competitive in Chile, and it should be lowered for long-time customers— at least by 20 percent. Sometimes the price is a limitation. We have seven instances and nearly 5 million users. If Quest Foglight could reduce its prices for the clients that have been with it for a long time, we would be able to have more instances."

"Compared to the other tools on the market, Foglight is okay in terms of pricing and licensing."

"The price is worth it, if you have the time to go through the information."

"Pricing is very reasonable. We were able to construct a pretty easy contract with Quest, who were very easy to work with and very amenable to what we are trying to do. It worked out well for us."

"The solution is expensive."

"I believe the licensing is on a monthly base."

"Essbase is competitively priced."

"It is a costly solution."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Database Development and Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

914,394 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

15%

Outsourcing Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Financial Services Firm

15%

Construction Company

Comms Service Provider

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	5
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	19

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	14

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Quest Foglight for Databases?

I have had a good experience with the licensing costs of Foglight for Databases, as we have a provider who has given us good prices, and so far we have not had any cost problems. Regarding configur...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Quest Foglight for Databases?

Overall, I am happy with the product, but there are a few areas where it could be improved. First, I think the user interface could be more modern and intuitive, especially for new users. Some dash...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Quest Foglight for Databases?

My main use case is database performance monitoring and troubleshooting. As a developer, I use Foglight for Databases to understand whether database performance is contributing to an application is...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Oracle Essbase?

A significant area for improvement in Oracle Essbase is that financial statement analysis, CAPEX and OPEX analysis, and financial consolidation must be done manually, as Oracle Essbase doesn't incl...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Oracle Essbase?

The initial setup of Oracle Essbase is dependent on whether you select BSO or ASO cubes. First, you need to set up the type of information and once the type of cubes is defined, you need to define ...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Oracle Essbase?

The pricing functionality in Oracle Essbase is handled through the model you develop, where each cube can be customized with members and dimensions for pricing and entities. You can implement any f...

See all answers

Comparisons

Spotlight vs Foglight for Databases

Compared 16% of the time

IDERA SQL Diagnostic Manager for SQL Server vs Foglight for Databases

Compared 9% of the time

Oracle Enterprise Manager vs Foglight for Databases

Compared 9% of the time

CA Database Management for DB2 for zOS vs Foglight for Databases

Compared 9% of the time

SolarWinds Database Performance Analyzer vs Foglight for Databases

Compared 8% of the time

More Foglight for Databases Competitors

Microsoft Power BI vs Oracle Essbase

Compared 14% of the time

Tableau Enterprise vs Oracle Essbase

Compared 9% of the time

Oracle OBIEE vs Oracle Essbase

Compared 8% of the time

SAP Business Data Cloud vs Oracle Essbase

Compared 5% of the time

Redgate SQL Toolbelt Essentials vs Oracle Essbase

Compared 5% of the time

More Oracle Essbase Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Foglight for Databases

September 2026

Download Foglight for Databases product report

Buyer's Guide

Oracle Essbase

September 2026

Download Oracle Essbase product report

Also Known As

No data available

Essbase

Overview

Foglight for Databases offers comprehensive monitoring with real-time activity screens and adaptive baselines. It provides a 360-degree overview and efficient UI, requiring no custom scripts, aiding in proactive issue identification and resolution before impacting end users.

Foglight for Databases is a robust tool for monitoring across multiple platforms, including SQL and Oracle. It provides features like the "Morning Coffee" dashboard and SQL Performance Investigator, enabling effective workload analysis and historical investigation. Despite some challenges with sluggish performance on large data volumes and excessive non-critical alerts, it remains a preferred choice for its ability to support proactive management and resource planning. Users appreciate its centralized view of extensive database systems, enabling swift detection and resolution of issues in real-time.

What are the key features?

Comprehensive Monitoring: Provides cross-platform real-time monitoring, ensuring effective database management.
Adaptive Baselines: Adjusts to various workloads, enhancing monitoring accuracy.
SQL Performance Investigator: Offers detailed workload analysis without server impact.
Proactive Alerts: Delivers timely notifications, aiding in immediate issue resolution.
Efficient UI: Streamlines user interaction, minimizing the need for custom scripts.

What benefits and ROI should be considered?

Time Saving: Reduces time in root cause analysis, enhancing productivity.
Proactive Management: Detects issues before they affect end users, minimizing downtime.
Resource Planning: Aids in effective allocation planning for enterprise and cloud platforms.

Foglight is extensively implemented in industries managing extensive database systems, handling numerous servers to ensure availability and performance. It assists businesses in resolving blocking and locking deadlocks, crucial for maintaining smooth operations in production and development environments.

Quest Software

Oracle Essbase provides robust multi-dimensional analysis with a strong calculation engine and aggregate storage, enabling fast calculations and swift response times for large data volumes.

Essbase offers scalable, stable multi-dimensional analysis capabilities, important for enterprises managing large datasets. Its flexibility and efficiency support detailed reporting, strategic decision-making, and advanced modeling. An intuitive interface allows fast data visualization and dynamic analysis, aiding strategic business operations. Continuous upgrades enhance performance and productivity.

What are the key features of Oracle Essbase?

Multi-dimensional Analysis: Enables complex data insights through powerful analysis capabilities.
Calculation Engine: Provides swift calculations essential for timely decision-making in business environments.
Aggregate Storage: Ensures efficient data handling, supporting fast response times and large data volumes.
Intuitive Interface: Facilitates fast visualization and enhances productivity through easy data management.

What benefits or ROI should users focus on in reviews?

Scalability: Supports growing data needs efficiently, maintaining stability.
Performance Upgrades: Continuously improves data processing speeds and system functionality.
Flexibility: Adapts to diverse reporting and analysis needs effectively.
Enhanced Productivity: Increases organizational efficiency with dynamic data analysis capabilities.

In industries like telecommunications, banking, and healthcare, Essbase is used extensively for financial management, including planning, budgeting, and reporting. It facilitates decision-making in multinational firms by supporting enterprise performance management and generating comprehensive financial statements. Users leverage it for complex data processing and intensive queries, improving operational efficiency.

Oracle

Sample Customers

CommitDBA

CHU de Rennes, Bellco Credit Union, Akindo Sushiro Co. Ltd, Deutsche Telekom AG, Samarco MineraÊo S.A., PCCW Ltd., QDQ media S.A.U., Boiron Italia, Specialized Bicycle Components Inc., Akindo Sushiro Co. Ltd., Air Canada, Daelim Industrial Co. Ltd.

Buyer's Guide

Foglight for Databases vs. Oracle Essbase

September 2026

Free Report: Foglight for Databases vs. Oracle Essbase

Find out what your peers are saying about Foglight for Databases vs. Oracle Essbase and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

914,394 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Foglight for Databases vs. Oracle Essbase report.

See our list of best Database Development and Management vendors.

We monitor all Database Development and Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.