NetFort LANGuardian and Plixer Scrutinizer are competing in network monitoring and analysis. Plixer Scrutinizer has the upper hand due to its comprehensive analytics.
Features: NetFort LANGuardian offers comprehensive network traffic analysis, deep packet inspection, and monitoring without hardware probes. Plixer Scrutinizer provides advanced reporting, in-depth traffic analytics, and detailed network performance insights.
Room for Improvement: NetFort LANGuardian could enhance its analytics depth and reporting capabilities, and improve scalability. Plixer Scrutinizer may reduce setup complexity, improve integration with third-party tools, and offer more affordable pricing.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: NetFort LANGuardian is known for straightforward deployment and excellent customer service. Plixer Scrutinizer requires a more complex setup but offers comprehensive support and resources.
Pricing and ROI: NetFort LANGuardian is recognized for lower setup costs and favorable ROI for SMEs. Plixer Scrutinizer requires a higher initial investment but provides excellent long-term ROI with its advanced analytics.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| Plixer Scrutinizer | 0.5% |
| NetFort LANGuardian | 0.4% |
| Other | 99.1% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 4 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 2 |
| Large Enterprise | 8 |
The Scrutinizer incident response system leverages network traffic analytics to provide active monitoring, visualization, and reporting of network and security incidents. The system quickly delivers the rich forensic data needed by IT professionals to support fast and efficient incident response.
We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
