Monte Carlo vs Splunk AppDynamics comparison

The compared Monte Carlo and Splunk solutions aren't in the same category. Monte Carlo is ranked #1 in DO , with an average rating of 9.0, and holds a 33.8% mindshare in the category. Splunk is ranked #3 in APM , with an average rating of 8.3, and holds a 4.0% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Monte Carlo users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 91% of Splunk users who would recommend it.

Monte Carlo

Read 1 Monte Carlo review

930 Views
316 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Splunk AppDynamics

Read 252 Splunk AppDynamics reviews

12,248 Views
9,676 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

Monte Carlo

Splunk AppDynamics

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Monte Carlo

Average Rating

9.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Data Observability (1st)

Splunk AppDynamics

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

252

Ranking in other categories

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability (3rd), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (5th), IT Operations Analytics (2nd), Mobile APM (1st), Container Monitoring (3rd)

Mindshare comparison

Monte Carlo and Splunk AppDynamics aren’t in the same category and serve different purposes. Monte Carlo is designed for Data Observability and holds a mindshare of 33.8%, down 38.1% compared to last year.
Splunk AppDynamics, on the other hand, focuses on Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability, holds 4.0% mindshare, down 5.6% since last year.

Data Observability Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Monte Carlo	33.8%
Anomalo	13.1%
Acceldata	12.4%
Other	40.7%

Data Observability

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Splunk AppDynamics	4.0%
Dynatrace	8.8%
Datadog	7.2%
Other	80.0%

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

Featured Reviews

Prathik Rokhade

Associate Sr. Manager at Financial Insight Technology, Inc.

Provides centralized data observability features and has an easy-to-use user interface.

The product's initial setup is in a daily improvement stage, deploying new plugins for upstream and downstream resources. It takes 25 minutes to complete. The process involves integrating with third-party services for Single Sign-On (SSO). It requires only one executive for maintenance as it has easy-to-use navigation and user interface.

Read full review

Gyanesh Rahatekar

Back office at Reliance Industries Ltd

Application performance management and error resolution improved with data-driven insights

Dynatrace has multiple functions compared to Splunk AppDynamics, so Splunk AppDynamics should add those functions, which are not available as of now. Dynatrace has a universal agent that collects all information related to their CI, and if one CI has multiple languages, then there is no need to instrument multiple agents. However, Splunk AppDynamics requires multiple agents; if I have one server with multiple applications in different languages, then I need to instrument different agents for each application. Splunk AppDynamics should work with Dynatrace with one single universal agent that works with all application languages, eliminating the need for multiple implementations.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It makes organizing work easier based on its relevance to specific projects and teams."

"The features of Splunk AppDynamics that I prefer most are the monitoring aspect, making sure we can drill down and find problems."

"Immediately allows you to see the relationships between the different nodes."

"Visibility to the end-users is a valuable feature."

"For anybody who is looking into enhancing or improving their application code quality, I would definitely recommend this solution."

"It is a stable solution. Stability-wise, I don't see any problems in the solution...The solution's technical support was good."

"All the metrics are baselines in networks, infrastructure, application, and user experience. AppDynamics offers its own query language. It is called ADQL. You can write code of any kind to do queries and analysis and you can use those within the reporting or within other research."

"This solution is easy to use and very powerful, it is a complete tool for us."

"It's good for a larger scale deployment such as what my company is working on."

More Splunk AppDynamics pros

Cons

"For anomaly detection, the product provides only the last three weeks of data, while some competitors can analyze a more extended data history."

"When you have high stress of visits I do not know if you are more stress because of the amount of visits or because you have to wait eternal 60 seconds to find out it things are going well or you already have mess."

"If it can be able to intelligently provide all the things we need to look at, from a data point of view, that would be very useful."

"This product has an issue with initial lag upon opening that we would like to see improved."

"The discovery is acceptable, however, users need to configure many things if they want good discovery."

"AppDynamics Database Monitoring could improve the price of the solution, it is costly."

"The cloud licensing needs to be improved. It's quite pricey."

"To improve Splunk AppDynamics, it should migrate seamlessly into observability Splunk, which is called Splunk Observability Cloud."

"The product's drawback is the licensing pricing. It could be better."

More Splunk AppDynamics cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The product has moderate pricing."

"There is no standard license instead, the license is adapted to the organization's requirements."

"AppDynamics is really pricey as it requires licenses for every feature."

"In terms of pricing, I feel that when you compare the benefits that we get to the price that we paid, it is reasonable."

"The pricing is very competitive."

"It would be better if there were more solutions incorporated into the base price. "

"The pricing for AppDynamics Server Monitoring in Africa and the Middle East is too expensive, so it's very hard to sell it to customers. If there could be different pricing or package for the region, that would be great. My company pays for the license of AppDynamics Server Monitoring on a per-agent, per-server basis. It's $700 to $1000 per server, and it's paid annually. My company is on a subscription model for the solution. On a scale of one to five, where one is expensive and five is cheap, my rating for the price of AppDynamics Server Monitoring is a two."

"There is a license needed to use the solution and it is expensive. The licensing model needs to improve."

"AppDynamics Server Monitoring is an expensive solution."

More Splunk AppDynamics pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Observability solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

867,821 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

16%

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Retailer

Financial Services Firm

28%

Computer Software Company

14%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	54
Midsize Enterprise	36
Large Enterprise	188

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Any advice about APM solutions?

There are many factors and we know little about your requirements (size of org, technology stack, management systems, the scope of implementation). Our goal was to consolidate APM and infra monitor...

See all answers

APM tools for a Managed Service Provider - Dynatrace vs. AppDynamics vs. Aternity vs. Ruxit

Hi Avi! It's great to see your thorough approach to selecting an APM package for your MSP company. Considering your focus on SMBs and enterprises in Israel, Dynatrace seems like a solid choice with...

See all answers

What do you like most about AppDynamics?

The solution saves time and cost.

See all answers

Comparisons

Datadog vs Monte Carlo

Compared 20% of the time

Grafana vs Monte Carlo

Compared 15% of the time

Acceldata vs Monte Carlo

Compared 12% of the time

Anomalo vs Monte Carlo

Compared 11% of the time

Dynatrace vs Monte Carlo

Compared 9% of the time

More Monte Carlo Competitors

Dynatrace vs Splunk AppDynamics

Compared 14% of the time

Datadog vs Splunk AppDynamics

Compared 9% of the time

Splunk Enterprise Security vs Splunk AppDynamics

Compared 8% of the time

New Relic vs Splunk AppDynamics

Compared 8% of the time

Grafana vs Splunk AppDynamics

Compared 4% of the time

More Splunk AppDynamics Competitors

Product Reports

No data available

Buyer's Guide

Splunk AppDynamics

August 2025

Download Splunk AppDynamics product report

Overview

Stop wasting time on data fire-drills. Stop trying to hack band-aid solutions. Stop paying for outdated data governance software. With Monte Carlo, data teams are the first to know about and resolve data problems, leading to stronger data teams and insights that deliver true business value.
You invest so much in your data infrastructure – you simply can’t afford to settle for unreliable data. At Monte Carlo, we believe in the power of data, and in a world where you sleep soundly at night knowing you have full trust in your data.

Monte Carlo

Splunk AppDynamics enhances application performance monitoring with advanced diagnostics and real-time insights, offering seamless end-to-end transaction tracking and infrastructure visibility.

AppDynamics provides critical tools for businesses to analyze application behavior and performance. Through innovative features like transaction snapshot analysis and adaptable dashboards, users can quickly identify and address issues, ensuring high levels of system uptime and efficiency. It is designed to support complex environments including Kubernetes and AWS, enhancing user experience by detecting performance issues early. Despite needing improvements in network monitoring and integration, it remains a robust option for tracking application health.

What are the key features of AppDynamics?

Real-time Performance Monitoring: Offers immediate insights into application behavior.
Business Transaction Tracking: Tracks transactions from start to finish for bottleneck identification.
JVM Memory Monitoring: Provides detailed JVM metrics and memory use information.
Deep-dive Diagnostics: Enables in-depth analysis of code and stack traces.
Adaptable Dashboards: Customizable views for better data interpretation.

How does AppDynamics benefit users?

Improved Incident Resolution: Faster problem detection and solution implementation.
Enhanced Application Performance: Real-time monitoring optimizes system operations.
Comprehensive Visibility: Provides a full view of application infrastructure.
Informed Decision Making: Detailed analytics guide performance improvements.
Customer Satisfaction: Enhances user experience through faster issue resolutions.

In industries like financial services and e-commerce, AppDynamics facilitates performance tracking across distributed systems, optimizing infrastructure to meet consumer demands. It excels in environments needing precise transaction monitoring and is pivotal in delivering high value and satisfaction.

Splunk

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Cisco, Sony, Nasdaq, Reserve Bank of New Zealand, Edmunds.com, Puma, Fox News, DirecTV, Pizza Hut, T-Systems, Cornell University, OpenTable, BITMARCK, Green Mountain Power, Care.com, Overstock, Paddy Power, eHarmony, Kraft, The Motley Fool, The Container Store, and more See more customers

We monitor all Data Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.