Intellect Digital Core vs Thought Machine comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Intellect Design Arena Logo
580 views|395 comparisons
Thought Machine Logo
4,831 views|3,762 comparisons
Ranking
9th
Views
580
Comparisons
395
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
1st
Views
4,831
Comparisons
3,762
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Comparisons
Also Known As
Intellect, Polaris Intellect, IDC 20
Learn More
Intellect Design Arena
Video Not Available
Thought Machine
Video Not Available
Overview
Highly rated practice management solution that can handle billing, scheduling, and an array of automated tasks.

Thought Machine is a Fintech company that builds cloud-native technology to revolutionize core banking.

Sample Customers
Lloyds Banking Group, RBC
LLOYDS BANK, Atom, SEB, Standard Chartered
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Financial Services Firm19%
Computer Software Company18%
Comms Service Provider11%
Government10%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Financial Services Firm30%
Computer Software Company14%
Manufacturing Company7%
Comms Service Provider6%
Company Size
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business30%
Midsize Enterprise13%
Large Enterprise56%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business19%
Midsize Enterprise14%
Large Enterprise67%

Intellect Digital Core is ranked 9th in Core Banking Software while Thought Machine is ranked 1st in Core Banking Software. Intellect Digital Core is rated 0.0, while Thought Machine is rated 0.0. On the other hand, Intellect Digital Core is most compared with Temenos Transact, EdgeVerve Finacle, Finastra and Oracle FLEXCUBE, whereas Thought Machine is most compared with Mambu, Temenos Transact, EdgeVerve Finacle and Oracle FLEXCUBE.

See our list of best Core Banking Software vendors.

We monitor all Core Banking Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.