Imperva SecureSphere Database Security vs McAfee Vulnerability Manager for Databases [EOL] comparison

"The audit feature is great. It is totally encrypted."

"The most valuable feature of this solution is the database security policy."

"It has a very user-friendly interface that's very detailed."

"Ability to send event monitoring and administrative activities."

"The tool's pricing is flexible and affordable for small and medium enterprises."

"There are three major main use cases of this solution. The first one is to fulfill compliance regulations. Customers—especially the banks, health sector, and manufacturing—need to comply with the regulations in different countries. They have to fulfill compliance regulations around the privacy of data. In order to fulfill those requirements, they're using Imperva. It helps them to fulfill these requirements, and they are not fined by the regulators. That is the first use case why people buy Imperva."

"The company focuses on and has a passion for security."

"The most valuable feature is the automatic reports on new databases, which gives us up-to-date inventory management."

"The feature I have found most valuable is activity monitoring."

"The technical support is good; they are knowledgeable."

"The support is very good. They are very quick to respond when we have issues."

"The firewall features are not very strong and should be improved."

"Imperva needs to improve their cloud capabilities."

"It would be better to update the solution by using a GUI that guides me, rather than through a CLI."

"Sometimes the reports are cumbersome, and you have to drill down to get more information."

"I would like to see improvement in the integration part of the tool. This should be an easy process."

"They can maybe look at its pricing model. Its pricing could be cheaper for the African countries or developing economies."

"The agent does not monitor databases in the containers."

"It would be more efficient if we could manage the consoles of management servers from a single location"

"In the next feature, I'd like to see more integrations and updates overall, specifically bottom tech."

"Technical support could be more responsive."

"The UI needs to be improved."

"The product’s price is reasonable compared to other products."

"The pricing over-all depends on the entry level. For example, if support and maintenance are about $20,000 - $25,000, the initial cost can be five times more. It is less expensive for the company to maintain the client than to make the deployment."

"The cost of support for this solution is very expensive."

"The pricing is reasonable and competitive."

"Pricing is low and scalable to add features and volume."

"The setup and license are quite expensive."

"This is an expensive solution and the price should be reduced."

"Imperva is too expensive for small and medium-sized enterprises. They're missing out on technology that helps them manage their data security better. Data security is essential because even the strongest network may be attacked from the inside without it."

"It's not expensive compared to other products that are available."