Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management (ELM) vs Tricentis LiveCompare comparison

IBM and Tricentis are both solutions in the Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites category. IBM is ranked #12 with an average rating of 7.5, while Tricentis is ranked #35. IBM holds a 3.7% mindshare in ALM, compared to Tricentis’s 0.1% mindshare. Additionally, 76% of IBM users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Tricentis users who would recommend it.
IBM Engineering Lifecycle M...
Read 19 IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management (ELM) reviews
  • 1,488 Views
  • 1,473 Comparison Views
76% willing to recommend
Tricentis LiveCompare
Read 1 Tricentis LiveCompare review
  • 191 Views
  • 73 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Apr 27, 2025

IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management and Tricentis LiveCompare compete in lifecycle management and testing platforms. IBM ELM offers a comprehensive suite for managing engineering processes, whereas Tricentis LiveCompare provides superior testing and analysis capabilities, making it ideal for quality assurance.

Features: IBM ELM includes requirements management, quality management, and change management, facilitating structured project development. Tricentis LiveCompare features advanced automation, comprehensive impact analysis, and tools for identifying test coverage gaps, enhancing testing processes.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: IBM ELM provides a modular deployment model for customization and strong customer support. Tricentis LiveCompare is simpler to set up yet still offers a satisfying customer experience. IBM allows flexibility, while Tricentis offers accessible deployment.

Pricing and ROI: IBM ELM has a higher initial setup cost with significant ROI due to its lifecycle management features. Tricentis LiveCompare offers effective pricing for its testing abilities and favorable ROI for test efficiency. IBM provides extensive benefits, whereas Tricentis offers a cost-effective focus on testing rigor.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites Report (Updated: July 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites
July 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 860,825 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

IBM Engineering Lifecycle M...
Ranking in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites
12th
Average Rating
7.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.2
Number of Reviews
19
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Tricentis LiveCompare
Ranking in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites
35th
Average Rating
0.0
Reviews Sentiment
8.1
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
SAP Service Providers (14th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites category, the mindshare of IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management (ELM) is 3.7%, up from 2.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Tricentis LiveCompare is 0.1%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites
 

Featured Reviews

Juergen Albrecht - PeerSpot reviewer
Combining tools for effective data analysis while customization and integration need improvement
The most valuable feature is how IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management (ELM) ( /products/ibm-engineering-lifecycle-management-elm-reviews ) allows me to present to the customer what the actual software, even hardware, will do. It helps them gain an impression of the complexity of the functionality and find an easier way to decide whether to implement it. A picture says more than one thousand words, which is why I work with the combination of ELM and the specification of DOORS. The automation capabilities I built use column-based scripts for analysis to search, fetch, and transfer information. When I open modules, it automatically analyzes the changes since the last opening by me.
Read full review
it_user713811 - PeerSpot reviewer
Accurately identifies what will be affected in production after a change or upgrade
The LiveCompare apps that my customers and I have benefitted from the most are analyses and reports on the following: * Upgrades – LiveCompare's Impact Analysis functionality accurately identifies what will be affected in production as the result of a change or an upgrade. It can also pinpoint accurately the scope of testing needed in anticipation of an upgrade. * Migration to SAP Hana – LiveCompare's unique reporting and advanced analytics streamline the entire migration process to SAP Hana, while minimizing costs, risk, and time. * SAP License management optimization. * Custom code analytics – Includes usage monitoring, quality and performance monitoring, Java analysis, and ABAP code quality. * Testing - LiveCompare optimizes the entire testing phase in upgrade projects.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"We have something called the GC (global configuration), which is a unique feature compared to any other competitor we have in the ALM space."
"The planning feature is rich with Scrum concepts: Sprint, Sprint retrospective, the rules in the Scrum framework."
"It's easy to use."
"The most valuable feature is the reporting of the CPU usage on the dashboard."
"The solution is customizable."
"The most valuable feature is how IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management (ELM) allows me to present to the customer what the actual software, even hardware, will do."
"One of the key advantages of IBM Rational ALM is its workflow capabilities, which enable seamless collaboration between development and production teams and ensure that all stakeholders are aware of the progress and readiness of the solution. Additionally, the solution is good for integration."
"The tools for requirement capture we have found very useful."
More IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management (ELM) pros
"LiveCompare's unique reporting and advanced analytics streamline the entire migration process to SAP Hana, while minimizing costs, risk, and time."
"LiveCompare's Impact Analysis functionality identifies accurately what will be affected in production as the result of a change or an upgrade. It can also pinpoint accurately the scope of testing needed in anticipation of an upgrade."
 

Cons

"In the next release, we expect a traceability metrics configuration where we can configure the user stories. We also expect them to improve or simplify the query process."
"IBM Rational ALM should remove the features not used by the customers and keep this product as lightweight as possible."
"The user interface requires significant improvement as it is overly complex."
"Some improvements to the user interface (UI) would be helpful, such as exposing more services to make it easier to customize to the needs of each customer."
"I think nowadays people are getting into Jira and other tools. What is happening is, this solution is becoming more traditional, whereas Jira and other tools are more attractive for the new users to learn and start using because of the graphical interfaces."
"The features should be more intuitive. If I'm looking for something, its location should be easy to locate."
"The GUI is a little bit outdated."
"The product must be more user-friendly."
More IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management (ELM) cons
"From my experience with the product, I would suggest adding a feature that would allow a customer who is reviewing the LiveCompare results to be able to connect remotely with one of IntelliCorp's experts (aside from their support) in order to assist the customer to better understand the results."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price of the solution could be reduced. Many of our customers are not using all the features and this could be why our clients feel the price is too high."
"This product is a little expensive and we had to pay extra to have them set it up for us."
"The solution is not cheap."
"We have a contract, but I am not aware of the details."
"IBM Rational ALM has both monthly and yearly licensing options."
"IntelliCorp is flexible in terms of licensing and the pricing structure. They are open to discussing a customer's specific requirements."
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
860,825 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
24%
Computer Software Company
14%
Government
12%
Transportation Company
7%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about IBM Rational ALM?
The solution is customizable.
See all answers
What needs improvement with IBM Rational ALM?
Improvement is needed in bridging DNG and Rhapsody and vice versa for better data exchange from both sides with some trigger technologies. This would provide a visual reminder of changes in a modul...
See all answers
What is your primary use case for IBM Rational ALM?
Most of my primary use cases involve the combination of IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management (ELM) ( /products/ibm-engineering-lifecycle-management-elm-reviews ) and DOORS, including both Classic D...
See all answers
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Comparisons

Jira vs IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management (ELM) Logo
Jira vs IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management (ELM)
Compared 26% of the time
Microsoft Azure DevOps vs IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management (ELM) Logo
Microsoft Azure DevOps vs IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management (ELM)
Compared 18% of the time
Codebeamer vs IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management (ELM) Logo
Codebeamer vs IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management (ELM)
Compared 17% of the time
Polarion ALM vs IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management (ELM) Logo
Polarion ALM vs IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management (ELM)
Compared 10% of the time
PTC Integrity vs IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management (ELM) Logo
PTC Integrity vs IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management (ELM)
Compared 9% of the time
More IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management (ELM) Competitors
No data available
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management (ELM)
June 2025
IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management (ELM) reportDownload IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management (ELM) product report
Buyer's Guide
Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites
July 2025
Tricentis LiveCompare reportDownload Tricentis LiveCompare product report
 

Also Known As

IBM Engineering Rhapsody, Rational ALM, MKS
No data available
 

Overview

IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management stands out for its robust Agile Scrum planning, lifecycle traceability, and tool management, offering cloud-based configurability and strong collaboration features.

IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management provides rich capabilities for Agile project management, facilitating requirements and test management, configuration management, and version control. Its integration with IBM Doors supports comprehensive requirements handling, and the cloud-based platform enhances collaborative efficiency across teams. Despite needing advances in user-friendliness and reporting, ELM's global configuration and compliance features make it invaluable in demanding environments.

What are the key features of IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management?
  • Scrum-based planning: Supports Agile methodologies with rich planning tools.
  • Lifecycle traceability: Offers complete traceability across development stages.
  • Customizable workflows: Adaptable workflows with Kanban for flexibility.
  • Git integration: Supports efficient version control and collaboration.
  • Global Configuration: Manages complex configurations globally.
  • Compliance and reporting: Ensures robust auditing and comprehensive reporting capabilities.
What benefits should be evaluated in reviews?
  • Collaboration: Enhanced sharing across platforms for seamless teamwork.
  • Cost-effectiveness: Delivers efficient tools that optimize project spend.
  • Comprehensive requirement handling: Facilitates detailed requirement management through IBM Doors integration.

IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management is vital in sectors like automotive and manufacturing, where it implements Agile frameworks to manage requirements, conduct testing, and handle defects. It integrates into development pipelines ensuring live traceability and visibility, supporting critical engineering processes efficiently.

IBM

Tricentis LiveCompare is a comprehensive tool that facilitates automated impact analysis and risk assessment for SAP updates, ensuring seamless integration and minimal disruption.

Designed for SAP environments, Tricentis LiveCompare provides targeted insights for risk-based testing, allowing users to identify critical areas impacted by changes. It enhances efficiency by streamlining test efforts, ensuring updates are implemented without unforeseen issues.

What are the key features of Tricentis LiveCompare?
  • Impact Analysis: Identifies areas affected by changes in SAP systems.
  • Automated Testing: Streamlines testing processes, reducing manual effort.
  • Risk Assessment: Prioritizes test cases based on risk, enhancing focus.
What benefits and ROI can be anticipated?
  • Reduced Downtime: Minimizes business disruption during updates.
  • Cost Efficiency: Lowers testing costs with optimized test strategies.
  • Improved Agility: Enables faster adaptation to SAP updates.

Tricentis LiveCompare is implemented in industries like finance and manufacturing, where SAP systems are integral. It aids in efficiently managing system upgrades and ensuring compliance with industry standards.

Tricentis
 

Sample Customers

Tennis Australia, WeCloud AB, Port Otago Limited, Logicalis US, Valmer, The Chevrolet Volt, Ashurst
Coca-Cola, eBay, BP, British American Tobacco, Surrey Country Council, AES, P66, MUD, Bentley Motors, Coats, Hershey, Kimberly Clark
Buyer's Guide
Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites
July 2025
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Atlassian, Microsoft, Nutanix and others in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites. Updated: July 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
860,825 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our list of best Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites vendors.

We monitor all Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.