Google Compute Engine vs NTT Cloud comparison

Google and NTT DATA are both solutions in the Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) category. Google is ranked #14 with an average rating of 8.3, while NTT DATA is ranked #18. Google holds a 1.2% mindshare in ISI, compared to NTT DATA’s 1.1% mindshare. Additionally, 93% of Google users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 75% of NTT DATA users who would recommend it.

Google Compute Engine

Read 16 Google Compute Engine reviews

836 Views
694 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

NTT Cloud

Read 2 NTT Cloud reviews

616 Views
573 Comparison Views

75% willing to recommend

Google Compute Engine

NTT Cloud

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 16, 2024

NTT Cloud and Google Compute Engine compete in the cloud services market. Google Compute Engine seems to have the upper hand due to its feature richness and perceived value, whereas NTT Cloud is strong in pricing and support.

Features: NTT Cloud provides reliability, compliance with industry regulations, and robust security. Google Compute Engine offers scalability, extensive global infrastructure, and superior integration with Google services. NTT Cloud focuses on security and compliance, while Google Compute Engine delivers a wider array of services for enterprise needs.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Google Compute Engine offers a flexible deployment model with comprehensive documentation and extensive community support. NTT Cloud has a straightforward deployment process with enterprise-level support and dedicated account managers. Google Compute Engine's large support ecosystem contrasts with NTT Cloud's personalized service, presenting different customer service levels.

Pricing and ROI: NTT Cloud generally has a lower setup cost, offering good initial ROI, especially for businesses prioritizing compliance and security. Google Compute Engine, with potentially higher initial costs, provides long-term value through its pay-as-you-go model and efficiency in large-scale operations. Flexible pricing in Google Compute Engine can yield better ROI for companies requiring advanced operational capabilities and global reach.

To learn more, read our detailed Google Compute Engine vs. NTT Cloud Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Google Compute Engine vs. NTT Cloud

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 879,853 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Google Compute Engine

Ranking in Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS)

14th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

NTT Cloud

Ranking in Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS)

18th

Average Rating

5.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) category, the mindshare of Google Compute Engine is 1.2%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of NTT Cloud is 1.1%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Google Compute Engine	1.2%
NTT Cloud	1.1%
Other	97.7%

Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS)

Featured Reviews

WahyuKurniawan

Head of Software Engineering at Abarobotics.com

Reasonably priced and offers high availability features

The synchronization between two tools, meaning if I have another server outside Google Cloud, as far as I know, I cannot mimic the server in Google Cloud to another server outside Google Cloud. I don't know if Google has the above-mentioned features or not, and if it does have them, then maybe Google can help us set things right and how to make a server mimic either of the servers outside Google. With the hot swap features or if Google Cloud itself is down, we can replace the services with another server. Right now, I have another server outside Google as a backup of a production server. There should be synchronization between servers inside Google and those outside it. The high availability features in Google are only available in Google Compute Engine in different regions. If I have another server outside Google, the high availability features in Google cannot synchronize with such a server.

Read full review

Martin Cangar

Principal Cloud Engineer at mavenit

Good stability and scalability with excellent additional services

The features that are on offer are pretty standard. The pricing and services that surround the solution are great. For example, if we need to find a partner in a country where they do not have a cloud, they will help us find that partner. Solutions such as Amazon and Oracle do not offer this level of service. The solution has quite good documentation.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The solution is readily available, and software engineers can provision it. It is scalable and allows self-service."

"The most valuable feature is auto-scaling."

"The solution helps to direct SSH into the machine at the click of a button. It also helps to deploy container images right from the UI. There is no need to manage the containers on the machine. I also like the tool’s Spot provision model."

"One of GCE's best features is the managed instance groups."

"The main motive for choosing Google Compute Engine is pricing."

"Google is managing all hardware. You don't need to provision or pre-provision your computer engine."

"Google Compute is highly scalable."

"In GCP, there's a custom configuration feature unlike AWS and Azure"

More Google Compute Engine pros

"The pricing and services that surround the solution are great. For example, if we need to find a partner in a country where they do not have a cloud, they will help us find that partner. Solutions such as Amazon and Oracle do not offer this level of service."

"The initial setup process is more accessible than one of its competitors."

Cons

"The licensing process is not a very straightforward process."

"Google Compute Engine does not have many options at a lower tier level. If they had more options it will be better. For example, Amazon AWS or Microsoft Azure, have more options and different types of instances, of VMs we can select."

"Sometimes support takes time to reply."

"It has some limitations. For example, you don't get through layer two connectivity. So I've had some difficulty deploying custom VMs. For example, you can't deploy a KVM file to file directly on GCP."

"I rate the product's stability around five to six out of ten."

"I would like to improve the solution’s UI while deploying a container. It is sometimes hard to figure out the container’s details and format that you want to deploy. The tool does not give you a guide to find out the error and why the container is not starting up which could be because you have configured it wrong. This is always a hit on the setup."

"Google Compute Engine needs to have multi-region support. It would also be nice to have a tracking mechanism."

More Google Compute Engine cons

"The solution could use more advanced monitoring."

"NTT Cloud’s performance could be better."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"In terms of improvement, one is definitely the licensing piece. So there is a feature, the BYOL (Bring Your Own License) licensing piece, to bring your own license. It is not that straightforward. It requires some support from Google to get it sorted, access those licenses, and configure those licenses."

"I rate GCE's pricing a five out of ten since it's affordable."

"The tool is reasonably priced, considering its scalability features. If we want to extend the server's capacity, we can do it, and I think it's reasonable."

"Google Compute Engine's pricing is flexible and the best of all other alternatives."

"Google is providing money for learning Google Compute Engine. They offer a $300 free trial to new customers. Any beginner can easily get started."

"Google Compute Engine is not the least expensive solution. Microsoft Azure, and Microsoft One, are offering a less expensive solution. The price is based on usage. Whenever we use it, we have to pay for only usage. It is a pay-as-you-go model."

"It's $60,000 to $70,000 a month to replace about $10,000 a month in data center costs."

"I rate the product’s pricing a four out of ten."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

879,853 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

31%

Financial Services Firm

Comms Service Provider

Performing Arts

Computer Software Company

14%

University

10%

Insurance Company

Legal Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	5
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	7

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Google Compute Engine?

Google resources are cheaper compared to AWS and Microsoft Azure. Among the three, Google is the cheapest option.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Google Compute Engine?

Google has a lack of focus on their products. They have many products in various areas of the market, but they do not productize or appeal to the market effectively. They should concentrate on prod...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Google Compute Engine?

The main use case is for deploying any standard application. I simply use Compute Engine, which is comparable to a virtual machine. It is essentially a VM machine.

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

VMware Cloud Foundation vs Google Compute Engine

Compared 27% of the time

Tencent Cloud vs Google Compute Engine

Compared 11% of the time

SAP S4HANA on AWS vs Google Compute Engine

Compared 10% of the time

Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) vs Google Compute Engine

Compared 9% of the time

Joyent Triton Compute vs Google Compute Engine

Compared 8% of the time

More Google Compute Engine Competitors

Amazon AWS vs NTT Cloud

Compared 50% of the time

Skytap Cloud vs NTT Cloud

Compared 16% of the time

Microsoft Azure vs NTT Cloud

Compared 15% of the time

Ingram Micro Cloud IaaS vs NTT Cloud

Compared 10% of the time

Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) vs NTT Cloud

Compared 9% of the time

More NTT Cloud Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Google Compute Engine

December 2025

Download Google Compute Engine product report

Buyer's Guide

Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS)

January 2026

Download NTT Cloud product report

Also Known As

No data available

OpSource IaaS Cloud, NTT IaaS Cloud

Overview

Google Compute Engine delivers virtual machines running in Google's innovative data centers and worldwide fiber network. Compute Engine's tooling and workflow support enable scaling from single instances to global, load-balanced cloud computing.

Compute Engine's VMs boot quickly, come with persistent disk storage, and deliver consistent performance. Our virtual servers are available in many configurations including predefined sizes or the option to create Custom Machine Types optimized for your specific needs. Flexible pricing and automatic sustained use discounts make Compute Engine the leader in price/performance.

Google

NTT can help you cut the costs of what is typically the most expensive area of your infrastructure while ensuring business continuity by rationalizing, consolidating, and pruning servers, applications, and data centers, eliminating waste, redundancy, and underutilization. With NTT data center capabilities including data center assessment, rationalization/virtualization, planning and implementation, and disaster recovery and business continuity, you can simplify operations, ensure the availability and reliability of servers and devices, and reduce resources, energy, and facility costs.

NTT DATA

Sample Customers

Allthecooks, BetterCloud, Bluecore, Cosentry, Evite, Ezakus, HTC, Infectious Media, iStreamPlanet, Mendelics, SageMathCloud, Sedex, Treeptik, Wibigoo, Wix, zulily, Zync

Dai Nippon Printing Co. Ltd., DNP Information Systems Co. Ltd., Independent Data Services (Asia) Sdn. Bhd., Toshiba Corporation

Buyer's Guide

Google Compute Engine vs. NTT Cloud

December 2025

Free Report: Google Compute Engine vs. NTT Cloud

Find out what your peers are saying about Google Compute Engine vs. NTT Cloud and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

879,853 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Google Compute Engine vs. NTT Cloud report.

See our list of best Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) vendors.

We monitor all Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.