Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

GitHub Code Scanning vs PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional comparison

GitHub and PortSwigger are both solutions in the Static Application Security Testing (SAST) category. GitHub is ranked #16 with an average rating of 8.5, while PortSwigger is ranked #6 with an average rating of 9.0. GitHub holds a 1.5% mindshare in SAST, compared to PortSwigger’s 1.9% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of GitHub users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 98% of PortSwigger users who would recommend it.
GitHub Code Scanning
Read 6 GitHub Code Scanning reviews
  • 1,150 Views
  • 1,093 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
PortSwigger Burp Suite Prof...
Read 64 PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional reviews
  • 4,322 Views
  • 2,766 Comparison Views
98% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 8, 2024

PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional and GitHub Code Scanning compete in the application security testing category. PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional holds the upper hand for manual testing depth, whereas GitHub Code Scanning excels in automation and integration.

Features: PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional offers extensive manual testing capabilities, deep vulnerability assessments, and robust penetration testing tools. GitHub Code Scanning provides seamless integration with development tools, automated code analysis, and is highly effective in continuous security monitoring.

Room for Improvement: PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional could improve user experience in advanced functionalities, simplify its complex features, and enhance the intuitiveness of its interface. GitHub Code Scanning could benefit from more comprehensive reporting features, increased depth in manual control, and enhancements in flexibility for diverse code bases.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional is noted for its complex deployment and significant learning curve but is backed by responsive customer support. GitHub Code Scanning features cloud-based deployment that is intuitive and integrates seamlessly, coupled with timely support services, making it user-friendly.

Pricing and ROI: PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional's pricing is seen as high but justified due to its comprehensive features, offering substantial ROI through detailed testing capabilities. GitHub Code Scanning is valued for its cost-effectiveness in the online service model, aligning pricing with its automation features, providing substantial ROI via its seamless CI/CD integration.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed GitHub Code Scanning vs. PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional Report (Updated: September 2025).
Buyer's Guide
GitHub Code Scanning vs. PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional
September 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 868,787 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

GitHub Code Scanning
Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
16th
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.7
Number of Reviews
6
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
PortSwigger Burp Suite Prof...
Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
6th
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.7
Number of Reviews
64
Ranking in other categories
Application Security Tools (10th), Fuzz Testing Tools (1st)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Static Application Security Testing (SAST) category, the mindshare of GitHub Code Scanning is 1.5%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional is 1.9%, up from 1.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Static Application Security Testing (SAST) Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional1.9%
GitHub Code Scanning1.5%
Other96.6%
Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
 

Featured Reviews

VishalSingh - PeerSpot reviewer
Traverses the entire network, scanning every system to determine which ports are open
You can use the tool locally on your system or in the cloud. I rate it a nine out of ten. It's a very good tool for people who want to start using GitHubCode Scanning, especially for software development or team collaboration. GitHubCode Scanning allows teams to collaborate by uploading files to repositories. For example, if someone is developing an application, they can host the code on GitHub Code Scanning. Other developers can then download the code for testing purposes. If bugs are found, fixes can be applied using the GitHub Code Scanningrepository, and everyone on the team can see the changes. Software developers often use GitHub Code Scanning for version control, and it's essential for CI/CD pipelines to work.
Read full review
Anton Krivonosov - PeerSpot reviewer
A special tool for penetration testers or security specialists to conduct security assessments
We use the solution for security assessments. It's a special tool for penetration testers or security specialists PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional is a standard tool in the security industry. It's a stable solution that has many features. You can download different plugins if you don't have…
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"It's very scalable, very easy to handle, and very intuitive."
"The solution helps identify vulnerabilities by understanding how ports communicate with applications running on a system. Ports are like house numbers; to visit someone's house, you must know their number. Similarly, ports are used to communicate with applications. For example, if you want to use an HTTP web server, you must use port 80. It is the port on which the web application or your server listens for incoming requests."
"We use GitHub Code Scanning mostly for source code management."
"GitHub Code Spaces brings significant value with its simplicity and ease of use."
"GitHub Code Scanning has positively impacted my organization as it helps us recognize errors and avoid many later issues which may arise."
"The static code analysis capability in GitHub Code Scanning is a very powerful feature, providing the ability to identify vulnerabilities and ensure code quality."
"It was easy to learn."
"The most valuable feature is the application security. It also has a reasonable price."
"The reporting part is the most valuable. It also has very good features. We use almost all of the features for different kinds of customers and needs."
"The most valuable feature is Burp Collaborator."
"The product has a good learning hub."
"I have found this solution has more plugins than other competitors which is a benefit. You are able to attach different plugins to the security scan to add features. For example, you can check to see if there are any payment systems that exist on a server, or username and password brute force analysis."
"The most valuable features are Burp Intruder and Burp Scanner."
"The solution scans web applications and supports APIs, which are the main features I really like."
More PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional pros
 

Cons

"One area for improvement could be the ability to have an AI system digest the reports generated from code scanning and provide a summary. Currently, the reports can be extensive, and users may overlook details, such as outdated libraries, which could be highlighted for attention."
"At times it becomes very annoying as it highlights certain things which are intuitive. They require code coverage for those aspects as an extra overhead."
"When running code scans, GitHub Code Scanning provides recommendations for probable fixes. However, integrating a feature where developers receive real-time highlights of vulnerabilities when checking in or merging a PR would be beneficial."
"GitHub Code Scanning should add more templates."
"The solution’s pricing could be improved."
"One area that can be improved, when compared to alternative tools, is that they could provide different reporting options and in different formats like PDF or something like that."
"The biggest improvement that I would like to see from PortSwigger that today many people see as an issue in their testing. There might be a feature which might be desired."
"There needs to be better documentation provided. Currently, we need to buy books, or we need to review online some use cases from other professionals who have been using the solution to find out their experience. It is not easy to find out how to properly do a security assessment."
"I would like to see the return of the spider mechanism instead of the crawling feature. Burp Suite's earlier version 1.7 had an excellent spider option, and it would be beneficial if Burp incorporated those features into the current version. The crawling techniques used in the current version are not as efficient as those used in earlier versions."
"Scanning APIs using PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional takes a lot of time."
"There is a lot to this product, and it would be good if when you purchase the tool, they can provide us with a more extensive user manual."
"Sometimes the solution can run a little slow."
More PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"GitHub Code Scanning is a moderately priced solution."
"The minimum pricing for the tool is five dollars a month."
"There are different licenses available that include a free version."
"I rate the pricing a four out of ten."
"The solution used to be expensive. However, they have reduced the price to approximately $400.00 which is reasonable."
"It is expensive for us in Brazil because the currency exchange rate from a dollar to a Brazilian Real is quite steep."
"PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional is expensive compared to other tools."
"The cost is approximately $500 for a single license, and there are no additional costs beyond the standard licensing fees."
"It is a cheap solution, but it may not be cheaper than other solutions."
"We pay a yearly licensing fee for the solution, which is neither cheap nor expensive."
More PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional pricing and cost advice
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Static Application Security Testing (SAST) solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
868,787 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
13%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Government
6%
Computer Software Company
13%
Government
11%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Manufacturing Company
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business16
Midsize Enterprise14
Large Enterprise35
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about GitHub Code Scanning?
We use GitHub Code Scanning mostly for source code management.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GitHub Code Scanning?
The organization pays for the license of GitHub Code Scanning, but specific price details are unknown.
See all answers
What needs improvement with GitHub Code Scanning?
In my opinion, areas of GitHub Code Scanning that could be improved include that a few things are not visible to us, such as where it stores data and which path. There is a separate team for that w...
See all answers
Is OWASP Zap better than PortSwigger Burp Suite Pro?
OWASP Zap and PortSwigger Burp Suite Pro have many similar features. OWASP Zap has web application scanning available with basic security vulnerabilities while Burp Suite Pro has it available with ...
See all answers
What do you like most about PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional?
The solution helped us discover vulnerabilities in our applications.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional?
The cost of PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional is reasonable at approximately $500 per year per user.
See all answers
 

Comparisons

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs GitHub Code Scanning Logo
SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs GitHub Code Scanning
Compared 32% of the time
Coverity Static vs GitHub Code Scanning Logo
Coverity Static vs GitHub Code Scanning
Compared 26% of the time
SonarQube Cloud (formerly SonarCloud) vs GitHub Code Scanning Logo
SonarQube Cloud (formerly SonarCloud) vs GitHub Code Scanning
Compared 9% of the time
Aikido Security vs GitHub Code Scanning Logo
Aikido Security vs GitHub Code Scanning
Compared 9% of the time
HCL AppScan vs GitHub Code Scanning Logo
HCL AppScan vs GitHub Code Scanning
Compared 9% of the time
More GitHub Code Scanning Competitors
Acunetix vs PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional Logo
Acunetix vs PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional
Compared 14% of the time
OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing vs PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional Logo
OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing vs PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional
Compared 13% of the time
OWASP Zap vs PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional Logo
OWASP Zap vs PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional
Compared 9% of the time
HCL AppScan vs PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional Logo
HCL AppScan vs PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional
Compared 7% of the time
SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional Logo
SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional
Compared 7% of the time
More PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
GitHub Code Scanning
September 2025
GitHub Code Scanning reportDownload GitHub Code Scanning product report
Buyer's Guide
PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional
September 2025
PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional reportDownload PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional product report
 

Also Known As

No data available
Burp
 

Overview

Code scanning is a feature that you use to analyze the code in a GitHub repository to find security vulnerabilities and coding errors. Any problems identified by the analysis are shown in GitHub.

GitHub

Burp Suite Professional, by PortSwigger, is the world’s leading toolkit for web security testing. Over 52,000 users worldwide, across all industries and organization sizes, trust Burp Suite Professional to find more vulnerabilities, faster. With expertly-engineered manual and automated tooling, you're able to test smarter - not harder.

PortSwigger is the web security company that is enabling the world to secure the web. Over 50,000 security engineers rely on our software and expertise to secure their world.

PortSwigger
 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
Google, Amazon, NASA, FedEx, P&G, Salesforce
Buyer's Guide
GitHub Code Scanning vs. PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional
September 2025
Free Report: GitHub Code Scanning vs. PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional
Find out what your peers are saying about GitHub Code Scanning vs. PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
868,787 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our GitHub Code Scanning vs. PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional report.
See our list of best Static Application Security Testing (SAST) vendors.

We monitor all Static Application Security Testing (SAST) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.