Galen Framework and Testim are test automation tools. While Galen is noted for its cost-effectiveness, Testim has the upper hand with advanced features despite a higher price.
Features: Galen is known for layout testing, wide browser support, and responsive testing. It offers scripting flexibility and is open-source. Testim provides AI-powered test creation and maintenance, reducing testing time. It integrates well with CI/CD tools, benefiting fast-paced development.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Galen's open-source model can lead to a complex deployment with a steeper learning curve but allows greater customization. Testim offers a smoother deployment via a cloud-based setup and intuitive interface. It also provides comprehensive support and resources for quicker issue resolution.
Pricing and ROI: Galen's open-source nature offers cost-effectiveness, attracting budget-conscious teams but may require extra maintenance. Testim’s higher price reflects advanced features, offering higher ROI by reducing manual effort and speeding up test cycles.
Layout testing seemed always a complex task. Galen Framework offers a simple solution: test location of objects relatively to each other on page. Using a special syntax and comprehensive rules you can describe any layout you can imagine.
Galen Framework runs well in Selenium Grid. You can set up your tests to run in a cloud like Sauce Labs or BrowserStack so that you can even test your responsive websites on different mobile devices. Galen can run multiple tests in parallel which is also a nice time saver.
Galen Framework is designed with responsivness in mind. It is easy to set up a test for different browser sizes. Galen just opens a browser, resizes it to a defined size and then tests the page according to specifications.
Testim is an end-to-end agile testing automation solution which utilizes machine learning for test authoring, execution, and maintenance. Users can create tests in minutes, run thousands of tests in parallel across different browsers, integrate with their existing CI/CD and collaboration tools, and more.
We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
