No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Exterro vs LAW PreDiscovery comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Exterro
Ranking in eDiscovery
4th
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
5.1
Number of Reviews
9
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
LAW PreDiscovery
Ranking in eDiscovery
20th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
5.0
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2026, in the eDiscovery category, the mindshare of Exterro is 3.0%, down from 4.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of LAW PreDiscovery is 1.6%, down from 1.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
eDiscovery Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Exterro3.0%
LAW PreDiscovery1.6%
Other95.4%
eDiscovery
 

Featured Reviews

reviewer2844027 - PeerSpot reviewer
Assistant Professor of Cybersecurity and Digital Forensics at a university with 1,001-5,000 employees
Hands-on forensic training has bridged academic learning and real-world investigation practice
Speed has been an issue, but at the same time, I wasn't sure if that is particularly something that could be improved because I understand that there are large forensic images and can take a significant amount of time to process. That has been one thing with my students. Usually when they're doing a lab, they have to take a lot of time to actually process the image. Sometimes I actually give them processed images for the latter labs, but when it comes to creating the disk images themselves and processing the images, it takes a lot of time. At the same time, sometimes the memory and hardware requirements could be demanding as well, specifically for lower-spec machines that students usually have. Although we do have lab machines that FTK runs on smoothly, for machines that students use, sometimes they can't be very high-end, so that is a real constraint. Since I am in academia, I would actually think more in terms of the academic pricing and licensing model. I would really appreciate if Exterro actually has an academic pricing or licensing model. Sometimes the cost could be a barrier. If Exterro has an academic program where it could partner up with universities to even give out exam vouchers or have some students sit for the exam with a reduced price and work with the institution, that would be really great.
Brian Grossman - PeerSpot reviewer
Director of Sales at Opveon Litigation Services LLC
A powerful tool for litigation support services, such as production processing to meet client requirements
LAW PreDiscovery can simplify its interface and offer a cloud-accessible version tailored to customers. We often use other cloud-based document review software alongside LAW PreDiscovery to meet specific needs. This interchangeability allows us to handle specialized export requests more effectively. There also needs to be a more straightforward process for upgrading licenses without contacting support.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"It takes a lot of manual processes out, saves time, and lowers overall organizational risks."
"In my opinion, the best feature Exterro offers is the in-depth imaging process it provides."
"The biggest positive impact on students of Exterro has been readiness, as they actually graduate with hands-on experience in an industry-standard platform that employers use, which essentially bridges the gap between academic learning and real-world practice."
"Exterro has had a positive impact on my organization by bringing many conveniences and delivering quick answers so that the board can make the best decision between terminating someone or even finding out if the person under investigation is or is not guilty in that incident."
"In my opinion, the best features Exterro offers are complete, cheap, and free solutions."
"Exterro is very stable and it is the best on the market."
"Exterro has positively impacted my organization by providing many features that aid in fast investigations of images, machines, systems, or files."
"As a forensic science student, I can realistically use Exterro for all of my academic work."
"The sourcing and the detailed background checklist are the most valuable features of this solution."
"I've found the ability to customize exports and indexing in LAW PreDiscovery to be the most valuable feature. It allows us to meet our customers' specific needs effectively."
 

Cons

"I think one of the pain points I had was the number of emails that had to be sent out. If there was a way to just maybe reduce the bulk — that would be great."
"In my opinion, Exterro can be improved with more accessible prices."
"Exterro's scalability is limited because you need a substantial hard drive and powerful hardware."
"Exterro can be improved by adding more sandboxing plugins or features since investigations increasingly require finding malicious files, processes, or any kind of DLLs or EXEs."
"Exterro could be improved because the documentation seems to be very short, and sometimes the kickoff setup is very tricky and confusing."
"The experience with Exterro's pricing, setup costs, and licensing is very bad because it is a very expensive tool."
"Sometimes the memory and hardware requirements could be demanding as well, specifically for lower-spec machines that students usually have."
"LAW PreDiscovery can simplify its interface and offer a cloud-accessible versiontailored to customers. We often use other cloud-based document review software alongside LAW PreDiscovery to meet specific needs. This interchangeability allows us to handle specialized export requests more effectively. There also needs to be a more straightforward process for upgrading licenses without contacting support."
"If you have a heavy workload, you wouldn't be able to complete the research properly."
"If these details, photos, dates of birth, and so on are not possible to include, I believe it would be much more efficient if multiple people could log in using the same email address, as we can in some other programs."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"LAW PreDiscovery licenses are pretty costly and are on a yearly subscription basis. Before committing to LAW, it's crucial to calculate and ensure that you'll see a return on investment."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which eDiscovery solutions are best for your needs.
902,894 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
University
10%
Construction Company
9%
Insurance Company
8%
Outsourcing Company
8%
Legal Firm
37%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Construction Company
10%
Government
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business4
Large Enterprise4
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Exterro?
I do not remember the cost, but I did save time because I had a last-minute assignment. It was very easy and I could complete it on time. It was a good investment.
What needs improvement with Exterro?
I would like Exterro to be a complete forensics workflow. Currently it is effective for handling digital evidence, but it only compares with EnCase, FTK Imager, or Autopsy. I want this to expand be...
What is your primary use case for Exterro?
As a forensic science student, I can realistically use Exterro for all of my academic work. It is very easy to understand and manage digital evidence. I use it for storage, tagging, and organized i...
What needs improvement with LAW PreDiscovery?
LAW PreDiscovery can simplify its interface and offer a cloud-accessible version tailored to customers. We often use other cloud-based document review software alongside LAW PreDiscovery to meet sp...
What is your primary use case for LAW PreDiscovery?
We primarily use LAW PreDiscovery for litigation support services, such as production processing, importing native files, converting PDFs, bate numbering, batch printing trial exhibits, and archiva...
What advice do you have for others considering LAW PreDiscovery?
If you're a more prominent law firm or a litigation support vendor dealing with extensive document processing, LAW PreDiscovery could be a good fit. However, for smaller companies or law firms need...
 

Comparisons

 

Also Known As

Exterro Fusion
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Allstate, Statoil, AOL, Nike, Citgo, Target, UnitedHealth Group, Microsoft, MetLife, VISA, Oracle, American Express
Murphy & King, BDO Consulting, Beasley Allen
Find out what your peers are saying about Exterro vs. LAW PreDiscovery and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.
902,894 professionals have used our research since 2012.