Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Endor Labs vs Ox Security comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Endor Labs
Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
35th
Ranking in Software Composition Analysis (SCA)
17th
Ranking in Software Supply Chain Security
16th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
Build Automation (32nd), DevSecOps (14th)
Ox Security
Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
36th
Ranking in Software Composition Analysis (SCA)
23rd
Ranking in Software Supply Chain Security
15th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
8.1
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
Application Security Posture Management (ASPM) (11th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Static Application Security Testing (SAST) category, the mindshare of Endor Labs is 0.7%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Ox Security is 0.9%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Static Application Security Testing (SAST) Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Endor Labs0.7%
Ox Security0.9%
Other98.4%
Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
 

Featured Reviews

Use Endor Labs?
Leave a review
Francisco Javier Vergara - PeerSpot reviewer
SecOps Engineer at Iriusrisk
Centralized visibility has reduced vulnerability noise and prioritizes real exploit risks
The best features Ox Security offers in my experience are its ability to provide context to a vulnerability and determine if a vulnerability is likely to be exploited or not. Ox Security delivers context through a mix of several things, including dashboards and its prioritization scoring system. Basically, if you have some configuration and your software is vulnerable to some kind of vulnerability, but that exact code doesn't execute the vulnerable code itself, it determines that the risk is unlikely to be exploited, for example. Ox Security has positively impacted my organization by helping to reduce the amount of noise we received from vulnerabilities because of the prioritization scoring it has and all of the context it provides. Regarding measurable outcomes, I would say that it has reduced the amount of noise by about forty percent. We didn't have that much noise before, so around a forty percent decrease in noise has helped us reduce the amount of hours we have to spend reviewing each vulnerability.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Static Application Security Testing (SAST) solutions are best for your needs.
884,933 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
10%
University
10%
Computer Software Company
8%
Retailer
7%
Financial Services Firm
16%
Computer Software Company
12%
Educational Organization
10%
Healthcare Company
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
No data available
 

Comparisons

 

Overview

Find out what your peers are saying about SonarSource Sàrl, Veracode, Checkmarx and others in Static Application Security Testing (SAST). Updated: March 2026.
884,933 professionals have used our research since 2012.