Devo vs ExtremeAnalytics comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Devo and Extreme Networks are both solutions in the IT Operations Analytics category. Devo is ranked #7 with an average rating of 7.9, while Extreme Networks is ranked #15. Devo holds a 4.4% mindshare in IOA, compared to Extreme Networks’s 2.3% mindshare. Additionally, 93% of Devo users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Extreme Networks users who would recommend it.

Devo

Read 30 Devo reviews

8,527 Views
1,791 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

ExtremeAnalytics

Read 3 ExtremeAnalytics reviews

1,976 Views
909 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Devo

ExtremeAnalytics

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 1, 2025

ExtremeAnalytics and Devo compete in the data analytics solutions category. Data comparisons suggest Devo has the upper hand in comprehensive features and perceived value, while ExtremeAnalytics performs better in pricing strategies and support satisfaction.

Features: ExtremeAnalytics provides real-time data insights, robust network visibility, and intuitive dashboard configurations. Devo offers expansive integration capabilities, advanced security features, and in-depth threat intelligence. Devo's features are seen as more versatile, particularly in security contexts.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Devo offers cloud-native deployment, facilitating rapid implementation and scalability, with responsive customer service. ExtremeAnalytics ensures a streamlined deployment for existing infrastructures and is praised for its hands-on support model. Devo’s services are considered more adaptive to evolving needs.

Pricing and ROI: ExtremeAnalytics attracts with competitive pricing and cost-effective operational management, showing favorable ROI in network-focused deployments. Devo, though with higher initial costs, provides notable returns through enhanced analytics and security capabilities, justifying the investment for data-centric organizations seeking comprehensive insights.

To learn more, read our detailed Devo vs. ExtremeAnalytics Report (Updated: November 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Devo vs. ExtremeAnalytics

November 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 921,749 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Devo

Ranking in IT Operations Analytics

7th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Log Management (21st), Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) (16th), AIOps (17th)

ExtremeAnalytics

Ranking in IT Operations Analytics

15th

Average Rating

0.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Network Management Applications (26th)

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2026, in the IT Operations Analytics category, the mindshare of Devo is 4.4%, up from 3.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ExtremeAnalytics is 2.3%, up from 1.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

IT Operations Analytics Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Devo	4.4%
ExtremeAnalytics	2.3%
Other	93.3%

IT Operations Analytics

Featured Reviews

Usama Khan

Team Lead Soc at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

Advanced threat hunting has improved SOC visibility and now supports faster incident response

Devo can improve in how its connectors enhance integration with third-party tools. Devo's architecture works by having you deploy a relay server in the data center of the client side and Devo SIEM is basically on the AWS cloud. There are specific ports which are enabled on the relay server, which are 514 and 13000, 13151, 152. However, when we talk about databases and custom integrations, there are not default ports in the relay server. No default ports are defined. For JDBC drivers, the port number is 1433, but it is not in the relay server. You have to add it manually. For Oracle RDBMS, the port is 1521, and it is also not there by default. I would appreciate more third-party integrations including Fortinet and others. Machine learning models can also be improved. Playbooks in the SOAR can also be improved. Regarding playbooks for automation, we utilize playbooks for automation in SOAR for automated IOC blocking on a firewall, on a web application firewall, on DNS security, etc. The only option for us to run the playbook is to schedule the job for it. However, if I want to manually run the playbook, there is no option for doing so. This needs improvement.

Read full review

Dushan Niranga

Product Manager at Connex Information Technologies

User-friendly initial setup, reliable, and effective wireless intrusion prevention

ExtremeAnalytics is used for reporting and monitoring The most valuable feature of ExtremeAnalytics is wireless intrusion prevention. ExtremeAnalytics could improve application control. The URL filtering is not working properly. We have had issues with the reports and heat maps not working as…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The thing that Devo does better than other solutions is to give me the ability to write queries that look at multiple data sources and run fast. Most SIEMs don't do that. And I can do that by creating entity-based queries. Let's say I have a table which has Okta, a table which has G Suite, a table which has endpoint telemetry, and I have a table which has DNS telemetry. I can write a query that says, 'Join all these things together on IP, and where the IP matches in all these tables, return to me that subset of data, within these time windows.' I can break it down that way."

"It's very, very versatile."

"But from a SaaS standpoint, if not best-in-breed, Devo is certainly in the top-two or top-three."

"Overall, using Devo has saved us time when compared to our previous security solutions, and I estimate that it took us 10 times longer to achieve the same thing without Devo."

"The features I find most valuable in Devo are that it works on unstructured data."

"When we show the people who are in charge of getting funding that we saved this number of man-hours, which correlates to this number of dollars, they're more willing to fight to get that funding for the next fiscal year."

"We can ingest virtually any log source, which is much better than our previous solution."

"The most powerful feature is the way the data is stored and extracted. The data is always stored in its original format and you can normalize the data after it has been stored."

More Devo pros

"The application response latency is valuable and suitable for troubleshooting."

"The initial setup of ExtremeAnalytics is straightforward and user-friendly."

"The solution's scalability is a ten out of ten."

"The most valuable feature of ExtremeAnalytics is wireless intrusion prevention."

Cons

"Customer support can be improved, particularly in APAC, as they have a small team and response quality sometimes lacks."

"One major area for improvement for Devo... is to provide more capabilities around pre-built monitoring. They're working on integrations with different types of systems, but that integration needs to go beyond just onboarding to the platform. It needs to include applications, out-of-the-box, that immediately help people to start monitoring their systems. Such applications would include dashboards and alerts, and then people could customize them for their own needs so that they aren't starting from a blank slate."

"There's always room to reduce the learning curve over how to deal with events and machine data. They could make the machine data simpler."

"The tools in Devo's active ports need enhancement in their investigative capabilities."

"In terms of return on investment with Devo, I'd say it has been costly due to the need for support and the overtime required for issues experienced at the beginning of the project."

"They can improve their AI capabilities"

"One major area for improvement for Devo... is to provide more capabilities around pre-built monitoring."

"Technical support needs to be more direct. For example, when we submit a ticket, the support team will delegate a task to the operations team, for example, or various other teams."

More Devo cons

"The solution's stability needs to be improved."

"There are issues with cloud distribution of the servers, and it could be faster."

"ExtremeAnalytics could improve application control. The URL filtering is not working properly. We have had issues with the reports and heat maps not working as expected. We have been receiving download errors when attempting to retrieve the heat maps and reports."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It's very competitive. That was also a primary draw for us. Some of the licensing models with solutions like Splunk and Sentinel were attractive upfront, but there were so many micro-charges and services we would've had to add on to make them what we wanted. We had to include things like SOAR and extended capabilities, whereas all those capabilities are completely included with the Devo platform. I haven't seen any additional fee."

"Devo was very cost-competitive... Devo did come with that 400 days of hot data, and that was not the case with other products."

"Be cautious of metadata inclusion for log types in pricing, as there are some "gotchas" with that."

"I'm not involved in the financial aspect, but I think the licensing costs are similar to other solutions. If all the solutions have a similar cost, Devo provides more for the money."

"Pricing is based on the number of gigabytes of ingestion by volume, and it's on a 30-day average. If you go over one day, that's not a big deal as long as the average is what you expected it to be."

"Devo is definitely cheaper than Splunk. There's no doubt about that. The value from Devo is good. It's definitely more valuable to me than QRadar or LogRhythm or any of the old, traditional SIEMs."

"It's a per gigabyte cost for ingestion of data. For every gigabyte that you ingest, it's whatever you negotiated your price for. Compared to other contracts that we've had for cloud providers, it's significantly less."

"Devo is a hosted or subscription-based solution, whereas before, we purchased QRadar, so we owned it and just had to pay a maintenance fee. We've encountered this with some other products, too, where we went over to subscription-based. Our thought process is that with subscription based, the provider hosts and maintains the tool, and it's offsite. That comes with some additional fees, but we were able to convince our upper management it was worth the price. We used to pay under 10k a year for maintenance, and now we're paying ten times that. It was a relatively tough sell to our management, but I wonder if we have a choice anymore; this is where the market is."

More Devo pricing and cost advice

"The pricing is an eight out of ten."

"The price of the solution is approximately $100 to $120 and is paid annually."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Operations Analytics solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

921,749 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

16%

Outsourcing Company

11%

Construction Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	11
Midsize Enterprise	6
Large Enterprise	15

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Devo?

The pricing could be simpler, and while the initial setup cost for a new instance is a bit expensive, the licensing can currently be user-based or driven by log volume, which is better if there is ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Devo?

In terms of improvements, I think Devo falls short with their support model, as they rely mainly on their support team in Spain. Although they do have a support team in North America, they lack kno...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Devo?

Devo is the bank's centralized log management platform that my team and I rely on the most. For centralized log management in our day-to-day work, one of the biggest data users would be our Red...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Splunk Enterprise Security vs Devo

Compared 7% of the time

LogRhythm SIEM vs Devo

Compared 6% of the time

New Relic vs Devo

Compared 4% of the time

Datadog vs Devo

Compared 3% of the time

Palantir Foundry vs Devo

Compared 2% of the time

More Devo Competitors

ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations vs ExtremeAnalytics

Compared 14% of the time

Cisco DNA Center vs ExtremeAnalytics

Compared 11% of the time

Huawei eSight vs ExtremeAnalytics

Compared 10% of the time

Splunk Enterprise Security vs ExtremeAnalytics

Compared 10% of the time

ScienceLogic vs ExtremeAnalytics

Compared 3% of the time

More ExtremeAnalytics Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Devo

November 2026

Download Devo product report

Buyer's Guide

Network Management Applications

October 2026

Download ExtremeAnalytics product report

Also Known As

No data available

Extreme Application Analytics, Purview

Overview

Devo offers powerful visual analytics, real-time data querying, and log integration capabilities within a cloud-native, multi-tenant architecture, supporting extended data retention ideal for long-term analysis and compliance.

Devo is recognized for its Activeboards, which facilitate visual analytics. High-speed search capabilities and real-time analytics enable efficient data manipulation and querying. Its multi-tenant architecture supports effective data segregation and customization tailored to distinct business needs, enhancing its value for handling complex log integrations. With extended data retention of 400 days and a cloud-native architecture, Devo is a robust platform for long-term analysis and compliance requirements. Though opportunities exist to improve browser stability on large searches, SOAR integrations, and its parser capabilities, Devo remains essential for incident response and security monitoring, offering centralized data storage and analysis.

What are Devo's most important features?

Activeboards: Facilitate visual analytics and data exploration.
High-Speed Search: Enables fast data querying and manipulation.
Real-Time Analytics: Supports instant insights and decision-making.
Multi-Tenant Architecture: Allows effective data segregation and customization.
Extended Data Retention: Offers 400-day log retention for compliance and analysis.
Complex Log Integration: Handles intricate data sources effortlessly.

What benefits and ROI should organizations look for in reviews?

Visual Insights: Enhance understanding through interactive dashboards.
Performance Efficiency: Saves time with high-speed data search and real-time results.
Customization Flexibility: Fits specific business requirements with multi-tenant architecture.
Long-Term Compliance: Ensures alignment with extended data retention needs.
Centralized Monitoring: Enables comprehensive incident response and security monitoring.

Devo is extensively used in industries focused on incident response and digital forensics, centralizing data for security monitoring across hybrid environments. Organizations benefit from its ability to store and analyze aggregated logs, creating alerts and dashboards to enhance visibility for network and endpoint activities in multi-domain settings.

Devo

ExtremeAnalytics provides a comprehensive and insightful analytics experience designed for network professionals seeking data-driven solutions to optimize and secure their networks effectively.

ExtremeAnalytics empowers users with real-time insights into network applications and performance, offering detailed visibility across the network. It supports decision-making processes by providing data that helps streamline operations and improve overall efficiency. Users can analyze and act on information swiftly, ensuring optimal network performance by tackling potential issues proactively.

What features does ExtremeAnalytics offer?

Real-Time Data Collection: Provides immediate access to network data for current visibility.
Application Performance Monitoring: Tracks and analyzes application behaviors to ensure consistent performance levels.
Predictive Analytics: Employs advanced analytics to predict potential network issues before they arise.
Granular Traffic Analysis: Offers deep insights into network traffic to optimize resource allocation.

What benefits and ROI can be expected?

Increased Network Efficiency: Drives higher performance by identifying and resolving network bottlenecks.
Enhanced Security: Offers insights into abnormal traffic patterns for improved security measures.
Cost Reduction: Helps reduce operational costs through efficient resource management and decreased downtime.
Improved User Experience: Enhances service delivery with stable and reliable network performance.

ExtremeAnalytics is widely implemented across industries such as healthcare, finance, and education, where robust network performance is critical. For example, in healthcare, real-time data analysis ensures the stability of patient monitoring systems, while in finance, it supports secure transaction processing by monitoring application performance effectively.

Extreme Networks

Sample Customers

United States Air Force, Rubrik, SentinelOne, Critical Start, NHL, Panda Security, Telefonica, CaixaBank, OpenText, IGT, OneMain Financial, SurveyMonkey, FanDuel, H&R Block, Ulta Beauty, Manulife, Moneylion, Chime Bank, Magna International, American Express Global Business Travel

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Devo vs. ExtremeAnalytics

November 2026

Free Report: Devo vs. ExtremeAnalytics

Find out what your peers are saying about Devo vs. ExtremeAnalytics and other solutions. Updated: November 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

921,749 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Devo vs. ExtremeAnalytics report.

See our list of best IT Operations Analytics vendors.

We monitor all IT Operations Analytics reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.