Devo vs ExtremeAnalytics comparison

Devo and Extreme Networks are both solutions in the IT Operations Analytics category. Devo is ranked #7 with an average rating of 8.3, while Extreme Networks is ranked #15. Devo holds a 4.6% mindshare in IOA, compared to Extreme Networks’s 2.4% mindshare. Additionally, 92% of Devo users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Extreme Networks users who would recommend it.

Devo

Read 26 Devo reviews

6,972 Views
1,464 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

ExtremeAnalytics

Read 3 ExtremeAnalytics reviews

1,547 Views
743 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Devo

ExtremeAnalytics

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 1, 2025

ExtremeAnalytics and Devo compete in the data analytics solutions category. Data comparisons suggest Devo has the upper hand in comprehensive features and perceived value, while ExtremeAnalytics performs better in pricing strategies and support satisfaction.

Features: ExtremeAnalytics provides real-time data insights, robust network visibility, and intuitive dashboard configurations. Devo offers expansive integration capabilities, advanced security features, and in-depth threat intelligence. Devo's features are seen as more versatile, particularly in security contexts.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Devo offers cloud-native deployment, facilitating rapid implementation and scalability, with responsive customer service. ExtremeAnalytics ensures a streamlined deployment for existing infrastructures and is praised for its hands-on support model. Devo’s services are considered more adaptive to evolving needs.

Pricing and ROI: ExtremeAnalytics attracts with competitive pricing and cost-effective operational management, showing favorable ROI in network-focused deployments. Devo, though with higher initial costs, provides notable returns through enhanced analytics and security capabilities, justifying the investment for data-centric organizations seeking comprehensive insights.

To learn more, read our detailed Devo vs. ExtremeAnalytics Report (Updated: August 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Devo vs. ExtremeAnalytics

August 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 909,701 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Devo

Ranking in IT Operations Analytics

7th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Log Management (18th), Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) (18th), AIOps (13th)

ExtremeAnalytics

Ranking in IT Operations Analytics

15th

Average Rating

0.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Network Management Applications (26th)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the IT Operations Analytics category, the mindshare of Devo is 4.6%, down from 5.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ExtremeAnalytics is 2.4%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

IT Operations Analytics Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Devo	4.6%
ExtremeAnalytics	2.4%
Other	93.0%

IT Operations Analytics

Featured Reviews

Usama Khan

Team Lead SOC at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

Advanced threat hunting has improved SOC visibility and now supports faster incident response

Devo can improve in how its connectors enhance integration with third-party tools. Devo's architecture works by having you deploy a relay server in the data center of the client side and Devo SIEM is basically on the AWS cloud. There are specific ports which are enabled on the relay server, which are 514 and 13000, 13151, 152. However, when we talk about databases and custom integrations, there are not default ports in the relay server. No default ports are defined. For JDBC drivers, the port number is 1433, but it is not in the relay server. You have to add it manually. For Oracle RDBMS, the port is 1521, and it is also not there by default. I would appreciate more third-party integrations including Fortinet and others. Machine learning models can also be improved. Playbooks in the SOAR can also be improved. Regarding playbooks for automation, we utilize playbooks for automation in SOAR for automated IOC blocking on a firewall, on a web application firewall, on DNS security, etc. The only option for us to run the playbook is to schedule the job for it. However, if I want to manually run the playbook, there is no option for doing so. This needs improvement.

Read full review

Dushan Niranga

Product Manager at Connex Information Technologies

User-friendly initial setup, reliable, and effective wireless intrusion prevention

ExtremeAnalytics is used for reporting and monitoring The most valuable feature of ExtremeAnalytics is wireless intrusion prevention. ExtremeAnalytics could improve application control. The URL filtering is not working properly. We have had issues with the reports and heat maps not working as…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"When we show the people who are in charge of getting funding that we saved this number of man-hours, which correlates to this number of dollars, they're more willing to fight to get that funding for the next fiscal year."

"The strength of Devo is not only in that it is pretty intuitive, but it gives you the flexibility and creativity to merge feeds. The prime examples would be using the synthesis or union tables that give you phenomenal capabilities... The ability to use a synthesis or union table to combine all those feeds and make heads or tails of what's going on, and link it to go down a thread, is functionality that I hadn't seen before."

"Those 400 days of hot data mean that people can look for trends and at what happened in the past. And they can not only do so from a security point of view, but even for operational use cases. In the past, our operational norm was to keep live data for only 30 days. Our users were constantly asking us for at least 90 days, and we really couldn't even do that. That's one reason that having 400 days of live data is pretty huge. As our users start to use it and adopt this system, we expect people to be able to do those long-term analytics."

"The thing that Devo does better than other solutions is to give me the ability to write queries that look at multiple data sources and run fast. Most SIEMs don't do that. And I can do that by creating entity-based queries. Let's say I have a table which has Okta, a table which has G Suite, a table which has endpoint telemetry, and I have a table which has DNS telemetry. I can write a query that says, 'Join all these things together on IP, and where the IP matches in all these tables, return to me that subset of data, within these time windows.' I can break it down that way."

"Devo has a really good website for creating custom configurations."

"The real-time analytics of security-related data are super. There are a lot of data feeds going into it and it's very quick at pulling up and correlating the data and showing you what's going on in your infrastructure. It's fast. The way that their architecture and technology works, they've really focused on the speed of query results and making sure that we can do what we need to do quickly. Devo is pulling back information in a fast fashion, based on real-time events."

"Overall, Devo is awesome, but it's got some room to grow."

"One of the immediate improvements that come to mind is the amount of hot, searchable data, as in the SIEM we had before we were only able to search back 90 days of hot, searchable data, whereas here we have 400 days worth, which has definitely improved our threat hunting capabilities."

More Devo pros

"The solution's scalability is a ten out of ten."

"The initial setup of ExtremeAnalytics is straightforward and user-friendly."

"The most valuable feature of ExtremeAnalytics is wireless intrusion prevention."

"The application response latency is valuable and suitable for troubleshooting."

Cons

"Some third-parties don't have specific API connectors built, so we had to work with Devo to get the logs and parse the data using custom parsers, rather than an out-of-the-box solution."

"We only use the core functionality and one of the reasons for this is that their security operation center needs improvement."

"Devo has a lot of cloud connectors, but they need to do a little bit of work there."

"Where Devo has room for improvement is the data ingestion and parsing. We tend to have to work with the Devo support team to bring on and ingest new sources of data."

"Their documentation could be better. They are growing quickly and need to have someone focused on tech writing to ensure that all the different updates, how to use them, and all the new features and functionality are properly documented."

"One improvement area for Devo could be simplifying some configuration and improving the onboarding for new analysts because it is quite complex for fresher or new analysts who are handling Devo."

"The cost is a little higher compared to other tools such as DataDog or Elasticsearch, so they could work on reducing costs."

"Devo has a lot of cloud connectors, but they need to do a little bit of work there. They've got good integrations with the public cloud, but there are a lot of cloud SaaS systems that they still need to work with on integrations, such as Salesforce and other SaaS providers where we need to get access logs."

More Devo cons

"ExtremeAnalytics could improve application control. The URL filtering is not working properly. We have had issues with the reports and heat maps not working as expected. We have been receiving download errors when attempting to retrieve the heat maps and reports."

"The solution's stability needs to be improved."

"There are issues with cloud distribution of the servers, and it could be faster."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Devo was very cost-competitive... Devo did come with that 400 days of hot data, and that was not the case with other products."

"Devo is a hosted or subscription-based solution, whereas before, we purchased QRadar, so we owned it and just had to pay a maintenance fee. We've encountered this with some other products, too, where we went over to subscription-based. Our thought process is that with subscription based, the provider hosts and maintains the tool, and it's offsite. That comes with some additional fees, but we were able to convince our upper management it was worth the price. We used to pay under 10k a year for maintenance, and now we're paying ten times that. It was a relatively tough sell to our management, but I wonder if we have a choice anymore; this is where the market is."

"Be cautious of metadata inclusion for log types in pricing, as there are some "gotchas" with that."

"We have an OEM agreement with Devo. It is very similar to the standard licensing agreement because we are charged in the same way as any other customer, e.g., we use the backroom."

"[Devo was] in the ballpark with at least a couple of the other front-runners that we were looking at. Devo is a good value and, given the quality of the product, I would expect to pay more."

"It's a per gigabyte cost for ingestion of data. For every gigabyte that you ingest, it's whatever you negotiated your price for. Compared to other contracts that we've had for cloud providers, it's significantly less."

"Our licensing fees are billed annually and per terabyte."

"It's very competitive. That was also a primary draw for us. Some of the licensing models with solutions like Splunk and Sentinel were attractive upfront, but there were so many micro-charges and services we would've had to add on to make them what we wanted. We had to include things like SOAR and extended capabilities, whereas all those capabilities are completely included with the Devo platform. I haven't seen any additional fee."

More Devo pricing and cost advice

"The price of the solution is approximately $100 to $120 and is paid annually."

"The pricing is an eight out of ten."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Operations Analytics solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

909,701 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

15%

Construction Company

10%

Outsourcing Company

Manufacturing Company

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	10
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	12

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Devo?

The pricing of the product is reasonable if we compare it with other Gartner leading products like Splunk, LogRhythm, Microsoft Sentinel, Google SecOps. Its licensing model is basically on per-day ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Devo?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Devo?

I am using Devo myself. Basically, I work at an MSSP, and we provide services to the organization for Security Operation Centers. In our Security Operation Center, we provide the service of SIEM vi...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Splunk Enterprise Security vs Devo

Compared 8% of the time

LogRhythm SIEM vs Devo

Compared 7% of the time

New Relic vs Devo

Compared 4% of the time

IBM Security QRadar vs Devo

Compared 3% of the time

Datadog vs Devo

Compared 3% of the time

More Devo Competitors

ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations vs ExtremeAnalytics

Compared 15% of the time

Huawei eSight vs ExtremeAnalytics

Compared 11% of the time

Splunk Enterprise Security vs ExtremeAnalytics

Compared 10% of the time

Cisco DNA Center vs ExtremeAnalytics

Compared 10% of the time

Aruba Airwave vs ExtremeAnalytics

Compared 3% of the time

More ExtremeAnalytics Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Devo

August 2026

Download Devo product report

Buyer's Guide

Network Management Applications

August 2026

Download ExtremeAnalytics product report

Also Known As

No data available

Extreme Application Analytics, Purview

Overview

Devo offers powerful visual analytics, real-time data querying, and log integration capabilities within a cloud-native, multi-tenant architecture, supporting extended data retention ideal for long-term analysis and compliance.

Devo is recognized for its Activeboards, which facilitate visual analytics. High-speed search capabilities and real-time analytics enable efficient data manipulation and querying. Its multi-tenant architecture supports effective data segregation and customization tailored to distinct business needs, enhancing its value for handling complex log integrations. With extended data retention of 400 days and a cloud-native architecture, Devo is a robust platform for long-term analysis and compliance requirements. Though opportunities exist to improve browser stability on large searches, SOAR integrations, and its parser capabilities, Devo remains essential for incident response and security monitoring, offering centralized data storage and analysis.

What are Devo's most important features?

Activeboards: Facilitate visual analytics and data exploration.
High-Speed Search: Enables fast data querying and manipulation.
Real-Time Analytics: Supports instant insights and decision-making.
Multi-Tenant Architecture: Allows effective data segregation and customization.
Extended Data Retention: Offers 400-day log retention for compliance and analysis.
Complex Log Integration: Handles intricate data sources effortlessly.

What benefits and ROI should organizations look for in reviews?

Visual Insights: Enhance understanding through interactive dashboards.
Performance Efficiency: Saves time with high-speed data search and real-time results.
Customization Flexibility: Fits specific business requirements with multi-tenant architecture.
Long-Term Compliance: Ensures alignment with extended data retention needs.
Centralized Monitoring: Enables comprehensive incident response and security monitoring.

Devo is extensively used in industries focused on incident response and digital forensics, centralizing data for security monitoring across hybrid environments. Organizations benefit from its ability to store and analyze aggregated logs, creating alerts and dashboards to enhance visibility for network and endpoint activities in multi-domain settings.

Devo

ExtremeAnalytics provides a comprehensive and insightful analytics experience designed for network professionals seeking data-driven solutions to optimize and secure their networks effectively.

ExtremeAnalytics empowers users with real-time insights into network applications and performance, offering detailed visibility across the network. It supports decision-making processes by providing data that helps streamline operations and improve overall efficiency. Users can analyze and act on information swiftly, ensuring optimal network performance by tackling potential issues proactively.

What features does ExtremeAnalytics offer?

Real-Time Data Collection: Provides immediate access to network data for current visibility.
Application Performance Monitoring: Tracks and analyzes application behaviors to ensure consistent performance levels.
Predictive Analytics: Employs advanced analytics to predict potential network issues before they arise.
Granular Traffic Analysis: Offers deep insights into network traffic to optimize resource allocation.

What benefits and ROI can be expected?

Increased Network Efficiency: Drives higher performance by identifying and resolving network bottlenecks.
Enhanced Security: Offers insights into abnormal traffic patterns for improved security measures.
Cost Reduction: Helps reduce operational costs through efficient resource management and decreased downtime.
Improved User Experience: Enhances service delivery with stable and reliable network performance.

ExtremeAnalytics is widely implemented across industries such as healthcare, finance, and education, where robust network performance is critical. For example, in healthcare, real-time data analysis ensures the stability of patient monitoring systems, while in finance, it supports secure transaction processing by monitoring application performance effectively.

Extreme Networks

Sample Customers

United States Air Force, Rubrik, SentinelOne, Critical Start, NHL, Panda Security, Telefonica, CaixaBank, OpenText, IGT, OneMain Financial, SurveyMonkey, FanDuel, H&R Block, Ulta Beauty, Manulife, Moneylion, Chime Bank, Magna International, American Express Global Business Travel

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Devo vs. ExtremeAnalytics

August 2026

Free Report: Devo vs. ExtremeAnalytics

Find out what your peers are saying about Devo vs. ExtremeAnalytics and other solutions. Updated: August 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

909,701 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Devo vs. ExtremeAnalytics report.

See our list of best IT Operations Analytics vendors.

We monitor all IT Operations Analytics reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.