Devo vs ExtremeAnalytics comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Devo and Extreme Networks are both solutions in the IT Operations Analytics category. Devo is ranked #7 with an average rating of 8.2, while Extreme Networks is ranked #15. Devo holds a 4.6% mindshare in IOA, compared to Extreme Networks’s 2.4% mindshare. Additionally, 92% of Devo users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Extreme Networks users who would recommend it.

Devo

Read 27 Devo reviews

7,610 Views
1,598 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

ExtremeAnalytics

Read 3 ExtremeAnalytics reviews

1,725 Views
811 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Devo

ExtremeAnalytics

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 1, 2025

ExtremeAnalytics and Devo compete in the data analytics solutions category. Data comparisons suggest Devo has the upper hand in comprehensive features and perceived value, while ExtremeAnalytics performs better in pricing strategies and support satisfaction.

Features: ExtremeAnalytics provides real-time data insights, robust network visibility, and intuitive dashboard configurations. Devo offers expansive integration capabilities, advanced security features, and in-depth threat intelligence. Devo's features are seen as more versatile, particularly in security contexts.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Devo offers cloud-native deployment, facilitating rapid implementation and scalability, with responsive customer service. ExtremeAnalytics ensures a streamlined deployment for existing infrastructures and is praised for its hands-on support model. Devo’s services are considered more adaptive to evolving needs.

Pricing and ROI: ExtremeAnalytics attracts with competitive pricing and cost-effective operational management, showing favorable ROI in network-focused deployments. Devo, though with higher initial costs, provides notable returns through enhanced analytics and security capabilities, justifying the investment for data-centric organizations seeking comprehensive insights.

To learn more, read our detailed Devo vs. ExtremeAnalytics Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Devo vs. ExtremeAnalytics

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 914,889 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Devo

Ranking in IT Operations Analytics

7th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Log Management (17th), Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) (17th), AIOps (16th)

ExtremeAnalytics

Ranking in IT Operations Analytics

15th

Average Rating

0.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Network Management Applications (25th)

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2026, in the IT Operations Analytics category, the mindshare of Devo is 4.6%, down from 4.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ExtremeAnalytics is 2.4%, up from 1.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

IT Operations Analytics Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Devo	4.6%
ExtremeAnalytics	2.4%
Other	93.0%

IT Operations Analytics

Featured Reviews

Usama Khan

Team Lead Soc at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

Advanced threat hunting has improved SOC visibility and now supports faster incident response

Devo can improve in how its connectors enhance integration with third-party tools. Devo's architecture works by having you deploy a relay server in the data center of the client side and Devo SIEM is basically on the AWS cloud. There are specific ports which are enabled on the relay server, which are 514 and 13000, 13151, 152. However, when we talk about databases and custom integrations, there are not default ports in the relay server. No default ports are defined. For JDBC drivers, the port number is 1433, but it is not in the relay server. You have to add it manually. For Oracle RDBMS, the port is 1521, and it is also not there by default. I would appreciate more third-party integrations including Fortinet and others. Machine learning models can also be improved. Playbooks in the SOAR can also be improved. Regarding playbooks for automation, we utilize playbooks for automation in SOAR for automated IOC blocking on a firewall, on a web application firewall, on DNS security, etc. The only option for us to run the playbook is to schedule the job for it. However, if I want to manually run the playbook, there is no option for doing so. This needs improvement.

Read full review

Dushan Niranga

Product Manager at Connex Information Technologies

User-friendly initial setup, reliable, and effective wireless intrusion prevention

ExtremeAnalytics is used for reporting and monitoring The most valuable feature of ExtremeAnalytics is wireless intrusion prevention. ExtremeAnalytics could improve application control. The URL filtering is not working properly. We have had issues with the reports and heat maps not working as…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"In traditional BI solutions, you need to wait a lot of time to have the ability to create visualizations with the data and to do searches. With this kind of platform, you have that information in real-time."

"The most valuable feature is definitely the ability that Devo has to ingest data. From the previous SIEM that I came from and helped my company administer, it really was the type of system where data was parsed on ingest. This meant that if you didn't build the parser efficiently or correctly, sometimes that would bring the system to its knees. You'd have a backlog of processing the logs as it was ingesting them."

"When we show the people who are in charge of getting funding that we saved this number of man-hours, which correlates to this number of dollars, they're more willing to fight to get that funding for the next fiscal year."

"It's a core tool for us in looking at logs, because logs are the starting point in any investigation, so leveraging Devo from start to finish in any investigation is basically what we do."

"Scalability is one of Devo's strengths."

"The alerting is much better than I anticipated. We don't get as many alerts as I thought we would, but that nobody's fault, it's just the way it is."

"Devo has a really good website for creating custom configurations."

"With Devo, we can eliminate swivel chair analysis among tools for a streamlined workflow that gives us the most direct path to the root cause."

More Devo pros

"The initial setup of ExtremeAnalytics is straightforward and user-friendly."

"The solution's scalability is a ten out of ten."

"The application response latency is valuable and suitable for troubleshooting."

"The most valuable feature of ExtremeAnalytics is wireless intrusion prevention."

Cons

"Some third-parties don't have specific API connectors built, so we had to work with Devo to get the logs and parse the data using custom parsers, rather than an out-of-the-box solution."

"The Activeboards feature is not as mature regarding the look and feel."

"The cost is a little higher compared to other tools such as DataDog or Elasticsearch, so they could work on reducing costs."

"The price is one problem with Devo."

"Technical support could be better."

"We only use the core functionality and one of the reasons for this is that their security operation center needs improvement."

"Where Devo has room for improvement is the data ingestion and parsing. We tend to have to work with the Devo support team to bring on and ingest new sources of data."

"An admin who is trying to audit user activity usually cannot go beyond a day in the UI. I would like to have access to pages and pages of that data, going back as far as the storage we have, so I could look at every command or search or deletion or anything that a user has run. As an admin, that would really help. Going back just a day in the UI is not going to help, and that means I have to find a different way to do that."

More Devo cons

"ExtremeAnalytics could improve application control. The URL filtering is not working properly. We have had issues with the reports and heat maps not working as expected. We have been receiving download errors when attempting to retrieve the heat maps and reports."

"The solution's stability needs to be improved."

"There are issues with cloud distribution of the servers, and it could be faster."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Devo is definitely cheaper than Splunk. There's no doubt about that. The value from Devo is good. It's definitely more valuable to me than QRadar or LogRhythm or any of the old, traditional SIEMs."

"I rate the pricing a four on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive."

"We have an OEM agreement with Devo. It is very similar to the standard licensing agreement because we are charged in the same way as any other customer, e.g., we use the backroom."

"I like the pricing very much. They keep it simple. It is a single price based on data ingested, and they do it on an average. If you get a spike of data that flows in, they will not stick it to you or charge you for that. They are very fair about that."

"[Devo was] in the ballpark with at least a couple of the other front-runners that we were looking at. Devo is a good value and, given the quality of the product, I would expect to pay more."

"Devo is a hosted or subscription-based solution, whereas before, we purchased QRadar, so we owned it and just had to pay a maintenance fee. We've encountered this with some other products, too, where we went over to subscription-based. Our thought process is that with subscription based, the provider hosts and maintains the tool, and it's offsite. That comes with some additional fees, but we were able to convince our upper management it was worth the price. We used to pay under 10k a year for maintenance, and now we're paying ten times that. It was a relatively tough sell to our management, but I wonder if we have a choice anymore; this is where the market is."

"Be cautious of metadata inclusion for log types in pricing, as there are some "gotchas" with that."

"Pricing is based on the number of gigabytes of ingestion by volume, and it's on a 30-day average. If you go over one day, that's not a big deal as long as the average is what you expected it to be."

More Devo pricing and cost advice

"The pricing is an eight out of ten."

"The price of the solution is approximately $100 to $120 and is paid annually."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Operations Analytics solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

914,889 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

13%

Outsourcing Company

11%

Construction Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

10%

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	10
Midsize Enterprise	6
Large Enterprise	12

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Devo?

The price is considered okay.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Devo?

Perhaps Devo could add some features in the future on the network part. Specifically, I think they could improve network traffic analysis capabilities.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Devo?

I have been using Devo as a partner and system integrator for three years. For log monitoring, the clients' use cases can utilize Devo perfectly. Compliance and security operation monitoring are th...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Splunk Enterprise Security vs Devo

Compared 8% of the time

LogRhythm SIEM vs Devo

Compared 6% of the time

New Relic vs Devo

Compared 4% of the time

Datadog vs Devo

Compared 3% of the time

Palantir Foundry vs Devo

Compared 2% of the time

More Devo Competitors

ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations vs ExtremeAnalytics

Compared 14% of the time

Cisco DNA Center vs ExtremeAnalytics

Compared 11% of the time

Huawei eSight vs ExtremeAnalytics

Compared 10% of the time

Splunk Enterprise Security vs ExtremeAnalytics

Compared 10% of the time

ScienceLogic vs ExtremeAnalytics

Compared 3% of the time

More ExtremeAnalytics Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Devo

September 2026

Download Devo product report

Buyer's Guide

Network Management Applications

September 2026

Download ExtremeAnalytics product report

Also Known As

No data available

Extreme Application Analytics, Purview

Overview

Devo offers powerful visual analytics, real-time data querying, and log integration capabilities within a cloud-native, multi-tenant architecture, supporting extended data retention ideal for long-term analysis and compliance.

Devo is recognized for its Activeboards, which facilitate visual analytics. High-speed search capabilities and real-time analytics enable efficient data manipulation and querying. Its multi-tenant architecture supports effective data segregation and customization tailored to distinct business needs, enhancing its value for handling complex log integrations. With extended data retention of 400 days and a cloud-native architecture, Devo is a robust platform for long-term analysis and compliance requirements. Though opportunities exist to improve browser stability on large searches, SOAR integrations, and its parser capabilities, Devo remains essential for incident response and security monitoring, offering centralized data storage and analysis.

What are Devo's most important features?

Activeboards: Facilitate visual analytics and data exploration.
High-Speed Search: Enables fast data querying and manipulation.
Real-Time Analytics: Supports instant insights and decision-making.
Multi-Tenant Architecture: Allows effective data segregation and customization.
Extended Data Retention: Offers 400-day log retention for compliance and analysis.
Complex Log Integration: Handles intricate data sources effortlessly.

What benefits and ROI should organizations look for in reviews?

Visual Insights: Enhance understanding through interactive dashboards.
Performance Efficiency: Saves time with high-speed data search and real-time results.
Customization Flexibility: Fits specific business requirements with multi-tenant architecture.
Long-Term Compliance: Ensures alignment with extended data retention needs.
Centralized Monitoring: Enables comprehensive incident response and security monitoring.

Devo is extensively used in industries focused on incident response and digital forensics, centralizing data for security monitoring across hybrid environments. Organizations benefit from its ability to store and analyze aggregated logs, creating alerts and dashboards to enhance visibility for network and endpoint activities in multi-domain settings.

Devo

ExtremeAnalytics provides a comprehensive and insightful analytics experience designed for network professionals seeking data-driven solutions to optimize and secure their networks effectively.

ExtremeAnalytics empowers users with real-time insights into network applications and performance, offering detailed visibility across the network. It supports decision-making processes by providing data that helps streamline operations and improve overall efficiency. Users can analyze and act on information swiftly, ensuring optimal network performance by tackling potential issues proactively.

What features does ExtremeAnalytics offer?

Real-Time Data Collection: Provides immediate access to network data for current visibility.
Application Performance Monitoring: Tracks and analyzes application behaviors to ensure consistent performance levels.
Predictive Analytics: Employs advanced analytics to predict potential network issues before they arise.
Granular Traffic Analysis: Offers deep insights into network traffic to optimize resource allocation.

What benefits and ROI can be expected?

Increased Network Efficiency: Drives higher performance by identifying and resolving network bottlenecks.
Enhanced Security: Offers insights into abnormal traffic patterns for improved security measures.
Cost Reduction: Helps reduce operational costs through efficient resource management and decreased downtime.
Improved User Experience: Enhances service delivery with stable and reliable network performance.

ExtremeAnalytics is widely implemented across industries such as healthcare, finance, and education, where robust network performance is critical. For example, in healthcare, real-time data analysis ensures the stability of patient monitoring systems, while in finance, it supports secure transaction processing by monitoring application performance effectively.

Extreme Networks

Sample Customers

United States Air Force, Rubrik, SentinelOne, Critical Start, NHL, Panda Security, Telefonica, CaixaBank, OpenText, IGT, OneMain Financial, SurveyMonkey, FanDuel, H&R Block, Ulta Beauty, Manulife, Moneylion, Chime Bank, Magna International, American Express Global Business Travel

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Devo vs. ExtremeAnalytics

September 2026

Free Report: Devo vs. ExtremeAnalytics

Find out what your peers are saying about Devo vs. ExtremeAnalytics and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

914,889 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Devo vs. ExtremeAnalytics report.

See our list of best IT Operations Analytics vendors.

We monitor all IT Operations Analytics reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.