Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

ESET Endpoint Protection Platform vs ForcePoint ONE Remote Browser Isolation comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

ESET Endpoint Protection Pl...
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
102
Ranking in other categories
Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) (17th), Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) (15th), Anti-Malware Tools (7th)
ForcePoint ONE Remote Brows...
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
Remote Browser Isolation (RBI) (7th)
 

Mindshare comparison

ESET Endpoint Protection Platform and ForcePoint ONE Remote Browser Isolation aren’t in the same category and serve different purposes. ESET Endpoint Protection Platform is designed for Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) and holds a mindshare of 3.1%, down 3.3% compared to last year.
ForcePoint ONE Remote Browser Isolation, on the other hand, focuses on Remote Browser Isolation (RBI), holds 0.8% mindshare, up 0.5% since last year.
Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform3.1%
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint10.0%
CrowdStrike Falcon8.2%
Other78.7%
Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)
Remote Browser Isolation (RBI) Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
ForcePoint ONE Remote Browser Isolation0.8%
Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform30.4%
Cato SASE Cloud Platform30.4%
Other38.400000000000006%
Remote Browser Isolation (RBI)
 

Featured Reviews

Tarkan GU - PeerSpot reviewer
Protects against threats and helps with ransomeware but needs optimization for lower resource usage
We are using ESET products for our clients, especially for entry-level protection tools. The demand for these tools is primarily coming from our clients, and we sometimes propose them to our clients as well We install the product in a standard way as a product. The primary purpose is to protect…
Use ForcePoint ONE Remote Browser Isolation?
Share your opinion
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) solutions are best for your needs.
868,288 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Comms Service Provider
15%
Computer Software Company
13%
Manufacturing Company
6%
Financial Services Firm
5%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business67
Midsize Enterprise17
Large Enterprise21
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ESET LiveGuard Advanced?
I would rate ESET Endpoint Protection Platform a five for pricing on a scale from 1 to 10, where 1 is cheap and 10 is expensive.
What needs improvement with ESET LiveGuard Advanced?
The areas where ESET Endpoint Protection Platform could be improved include implementing single sign-on for the cloud environment, true multi-tenant options, and extensive APIs to easily integrate ...
What is your primary use case for ESET LiveGuard Advanced?
The main use case for ESET Endpoint Protection Platform is endpoint protection and blocking malware, making sure that the firewalls on the endpoints are correctly configured and allowing easy manag...
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Also Known As

Smart Security, ESET PROTECT Advanced, ESET LiveGuard Advanced, ESET PROTECT Platform
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

ERSTE Group Bank, Miller Solutions, Wesleyan University, The Hospital Center of Luxembourg, Deer Valley USD, SPAR, Industrial Federal Credit Union, Honda, City Hall of Palmela, Hays CISD, Lester B Pearson School Board
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, CrowdStrike, SentinelOne and others in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP). Updated: September 2025.
868,288 professionals have used our research since 2012.