Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Cloudflare Workers vs Infinite Blue comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Cloudflare Workers
Ranking in Rapid Application Development Software
24th
Average Rating
9.0
Reviews Sentiment
8.2
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Infinite Blue
Ranking in Rapid Application Development Software
50th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
Low-Code Development Platforms (55th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Rapid Application Development Software category, the mindshare of Cloudflare Workers is 0.3%, up from 0.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Infinite Blue is 0.2%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Rapid Application Development Software
 

Featured Reviews

KA
Our application responds faster and uses global data effectively
The most valuable feature of Cloudflare Workers is that the data is on the edge. Since the data is on the edge, it makes the application more responsive worldwide, thus lowering the loading time and increasing user engagement. The scalability of Cloudflare Workers is also impressive, as it can handle spikes of traffic with ease. Cloudflare Workers also contributes to the application being faster and geographically distributed.
Logisthead67 - PeerSpot reviewer
A simple solution with an easy setup and good stability
The solution is simple. It's very easy to deploy, and there's no risk with sorting that out. It's very fast to develop the screens and the modelilng The solution is expensive. They should try to improve their pricing strategy. The user interface should add some more functionality in the next…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Overall, Cloudflare Workers is a very good solution."
"The most valuable feature of Cloudflare Workers is that the data is on the edge."
"The solution is simple. It's very easy to deploy, and there's no risk with sorting that out. It's very fast to develop the screens and the modelling."
 

Cons

"In general, the security of the product could be improved with minimal latency due to its many points of presence."
"Monitoring needs improvement. It's a bit difficult to understand how many failures occur and manage logging effectively."
"The solution is expensive. They should try to improve their pricing strategy."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Rapid Application Development Software solutions are best for your needs.
865,164 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cloudflare Workers?
Pricing is fair considering the features offered. Our costs vary based on load, with expenses around €100 per month for CORS and approximately €600 per month for using Workers to have data on the e...
What needs improvement with Cloudflare Workers?
Monitoring needs improvement. It's a bit difficult to understand how many failures occur and manage logging effectively.
What is your primary use case for Cloudflare Workers?
We use Cloudflare Workers ( /products/cloudflare-workers-reviews ) mainly to avoid Cross-Origin Resource Sharing (CORS) issues and as a reverse proxy. It has also been beneficial in speeding up our...
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Also Known As

No data available
Progress Rollbase, Rollbase
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
Pironet NDH, Jungle Lasers, Aintercarga SAS, ASPsoftware, Cloudselling
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, ServiceNow, Oracle and others in Rapid Application Development Software. Updated: August 2025.
865,164 professionals have used our research since 2012.