We performed a comparison between Check Point Security Management and ThreatQ based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Threat Intelligence Platforms solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."URL filtering is a very important feature."
"This solution is easy to install and deploy. It is also user-friendly."
"The features we like and find the most valuable are the ways we can manage the policy, create objects, and drag and drop objects in our daily operation. It makes our daily operation on the firewall management much easier than going, for example, to one firewall, then going to the other."
"Check Point Security Management has improved our organization because all corporate firewalls can be managed with a single interface."
"The compliance is great."
"The log dashboard in the SmartConsole is very useful and convenient for monitoring and tracking."
"Check Point management is one of the most complete solutions for managing Check Point Firewall appliances."
"The intuitive interface also allows new team members to adapt to the technology if they are not familiar with it initially. It doesn't take much for one to familiarize themselves with the product."
"The reporting services are great. With reporting services, if you have customers that just visit a URL you can see the result - including why it's blocked and how and how the URL was first recognized as malicious."
"Integrating the solution with our existing security tools and workflows was easy."
"Policy installation time can be reduced."
"In the last version from 80.20, there are some issues around SSNA Diction. I would like this to be improved."
"Check Point could improve by enhancing the networking in their solution in order to align it with the existing network architecture."
"SD-WAN functionality could be added."
"I would like for users to have more control over the platform in the next release. Right now, the system is very central and general requiring new rules to be created that better-suite our requirements."
"The application filtering and URL filtering could be better."
"Support is the main area that they need to improve. Our support experience is not very smooth. We are based in Africa, and we don't know whether it is because of our region. I would like a feature where there is a workflow to provide authorization to some users before they're able to create and apply rules. Such a feature should be integrated with the management. It should not be in the box that comes with it."
"The graphical interface is nice but it is a bit heavy."
"The solution should be simpler for the end-user in terms of reporting and navigating the product."
"The tool is not user-friendly."
More Check Point Security Management Pricing and Cost Advice →
Check Point Security Management is ranked 2nd in Threat Intelligence Platforms with 55 reviews while ThreatQ is ranked 12th in Threat Intelligence Platforms with 2 reviews. Check Point Security Management is rated 8.8, while ThreatQ is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of Check Point Security Management writes "Great DDoS protection, high availability, and useful firewall rule implementation". On the other hand, the top reviewer of ThreatQ writes "Improves the threat intelligence gathering process, but it is not user-friendly". Check Point Security Management is most compared with Wazuh, Fortinet FortiAnalyzer, IBM Security QRadar, LogRhythm SIEM and Splunk Cloud Platform, whereas ThreatQ is most compared with ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP), Anomali ThreatStream, Recorded Future and Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR. See our Check Point Security Management vs. ThreatQ report.
See our list of best Threat Intelligence Platforms vendors.
We monitor all Threat Intelligence Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.