Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Check Point Security Management vs Kaspersky Threat Intelligence Services comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 11, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Check Point Security Manage...
Ranking in Threat Intelligence Platforms
7th
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.3
Number of Reviews
65
Ranking in other categories
Log Management (9th), Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) (13th)
Kaspersky Threat Intelligen...
Ranking in Threat Intelligence Platforms
28th
Average Rating
7.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.8
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Threat Intelligence Platforms category, the mindshare of Check Point Security Management is 0.6%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Kaspersky Threat Intelligence Services is 1.1%, up from 0.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Threat Intelligence Platforms
 

Featured Reviews

NareshKumar10 - PeerSpot reviewer
Enhanced Internal Security and Efficiency
Check Point Security Management can be improved by addressing a negative challenge I face: sometimes it does not show internet utilization in the GUI. When I ask support, they tell me to upgrade the firmware, which happens quite frequently. Since I deployed the device in my on-premises environment 1.5 years ago, I have experienced this issue three times. Check Point Security Management has not impacted my daily work or decision-making in any negative way. As an IT person, I occasionally need to check how much internet bandwidth has been used in the internal network over the past month, day, or week. During those times, when I open the data utilization column, it shows nothing available. Each time this happens, I need to upgrade to the latest version of the firmware, and this frequent updating affects my productivity negatively. If Check Point addresses this issue in the future, it will be beneficial for all customers using Check Point SMBs.
Abdelrahman Hussein - PeerSpot reviewer
Provides useful real-time threat intelligence features but has limited capabilities
We use the product to search for IoCs. It is a good tool, but we do not use all its capabilities. We have only done a POC of the product. The real-time threat intelligence features are useful. The tool has good capabilities. It has a database of IoCs The solution is limited. I have been using…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Each department can easily share data with the management without fear of data compromise."
"The management API is the best new feature for me. It allows us to further automate our customers' automated server ordering."
"The unique management using Smart Console for all firewalls is very useful."
"The reporting system provides real-time insights into the security situation and shows measures that can be taken to protect our data."
"The intuitive interface also allows new team members to adapt to the technology if they are not familiar with it initially. It doesn't take much for one to familiarize themselves with the product."
"It's a great complete endpoint security solution that prevents the most imminent threats to the endpoint such as ransomware, phishing, or malware."
"I love the URL filtering as well as the identification capabilities which link with the Active Directory and work for me even with bandwidth regulation. These allow me to select to whom to do what, and when."
"Check Point Security Management is very useful when compared to other devices."
"The solution improved our overall security posture."
"The real-time threat intelligence features are useful."
 

Cons

"Being a security appliance, there should be the ability for the Security Management server to send email alerts via authenticated email."
"Check Point Security Management lacks some of the competitor features."
"We'd like to see more and more integration possibilities between Checkpoint and other vendor security solutions such as Malwarebytes, SIEM solution providers, and standalone vulnerability scanners."
"The tool is expensive."
"The reporting should be improved in future releases. It needs to be very explicit. This is very important."
"You need some technical expertise to use the solution. I don't think it's accessible to the typical end-user. You need to access the box and use some command lines or the web interface. It would be nice to have a user-friendly dashboard and comprehensive reporting."
"The usability of the solution could be improved."
"In the last version from 80.20, there are some issues around SSNA Diction. I would like this to be improved."
"More insights would be helpful. We have multiple solutions for threat intelligence. If someone has a bigger view or full eye on all the incidents, it will be beneficial."
"The solution is limited."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Check Point is much cheaper than the competition ($4/server as compared to $17/server)."
"The solution is expensive."
"This product can be used for 25 security gateways on a basic license."
"If one will be very expensive, and ten means low price, I rate the tool's price as a three out of ten."
"The solution is expensive and there is an annual license."
"Price-wise, it is an expensive solution."
"Do the homework because Check Point is rather expensive."
"The pricing can be estimated around 3 or 4 out of 10 in terms of expense."
Information not available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Threat Intelligence Platforms solutions are best for your needs.
865,295 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
11%
Comms Service Provider
8%
Financial Services Firm
7%
Manufacturing Company
6%
Computer Software Company
21%
Financial Services Firm
15%
Comms Service Provider
14%
Healthcare Company
11%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Check Point Security Management?
The most beneficial features for us are the alert classifications, which help us prioritize critical issues, and the detailed reports that provide insights into attack origins and purposes, such as...
What needs improvement with Check Point Security Management?
I see areas of improvement for Check Point Security Management such as GUI stability and performance, and simplified firmware upgrades. I and my colleagues occasionally report glitches or missing d...
What is your primary use case for Check Point Security Management?
My main use case for Check Point Security Management is to unify firewall and threat prevention policies across multiple international sites, so I use SmartConsole to streamline rule updates and mo...
What do you like most about Kaspersky Threat Intelligence Services?
The real-time threat intelligence features are useful.
What needs improvement with Kaspersky Threat Intelligence Services?
More insights would be helpful. We have multiple solutions for threat intelligence. If someone has a bigger view or full eye on all the incidents, it will be beneficial. So, to include everything i...
 

Also Known As

R80.10, R80, R77.30, R77, Check Point R80.10 Security Management, R80 Security Management
Kaspersky Threat Intelligence
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Hedgetec, Geiger
Telefonica, VimpelCom, Monclick, Ezenta
Find out what your peers are saying about Check Point Security Management vs. Kaspersky Threat Intelligence Services and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.
865,295 professionals have used our research since 2012.