We performed a comparison between Check Point Security Management and Group-IB Threat Intelligence based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Threat Intelligence Platforms solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Having the possibility to use Smart Event to check for threats on a broader scale helps after a security incident and also makes it easier to check - instead of looking through different logs."
"The company uses software called Harmony. Check Point integrates nicely, whether on an endpoint or mobile device. It integrates well with the firewall and can give me reports that I can check without going to an online portal."
"The features we like and find the most valuable are the ways we can manage the policy, create objects, and drag and drop objects in our daily operation. It makes our daily operation on the firewall management much easier than going, for example, to one firewall, then going to the other."
"We are now able to monitor the different VPN communities in real-time."
"The support is pretty incredible. Check Point has support rep programs that go all the way up to putting one of their own people in your business to help you. Then, they have support programs. If you're an expert, you just need to be able to download updated files and stuff. They have support programs like that, too."
"The product has done a great job in protecting our business network and SCADA systems."
"One of the most outstanding characteristics of its centralized administration is its great computing power."
"The fact that everything starts from the same unified management console makes it very easy to integrate new equipment or functionalities once the operator has become familiar with it, as everything will follow similar management or operation mechanisms."
"The tool's most valuable feature is the sandbox."
"The most valuable Group-IB Threat Intelligence features are their detections, especially in terms of account and card information leakage. This data sets Group-IB apart from some of the competition."
"We have found the site intelligence features to be the most valuable."
"Threat Intelligence's best feature is threat activation."
"The totality of the recordings is quite important. The networks, the new threat actors, the new methods, tactics, techniques, and procedures."
"It also offers compatibility with third-party security solutions, however, it is not a lot. This needs to be improved."
"SD-WAN functionality could be added."
"I would like this solution to be integrated directly into the Cluster XL equipment."
"The tool is expensive."
"Check Point Security Management lacks some of the competitor features."
"Installing a policy takes a very long time to complete."
"I would like for users to have more control over the platform in the next release. Right now, the system is very central and general requiring new rules to be created that better-suite our requirements."
"In my experience, the place they can improve the most is in the technical support where I have had some serious problems that could not be solved in time due to a lack of knowledge of the assigned engineer."
"Threat Intelligence's OT security could be improved."
"The lack of appliance-based or on-premise options for this solution is its biggest downfall. Clients request them often."
"The web intelligence could be improved. It is not as good as the intelligence from other solutions."
"Group-IB Threat Intelligence should improve integration for SIEM and SOAR solutions."
"As the landscape evolves, they could provide a little more detail or specificity to map it to the MITRE ATT&CK framework."
More Check Point Security Management Pricing and Cost Advice →
Check Point Security Management is ranked 2nd in Threat Intelligence Platforms with 55 reviews while Group-IB Threat Intelligence is ranked 9th in Threat Intelligence Platforms with 5 reviews. Check Point Security Management is rated 8.8, while Group-IB Threat Intelligence is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of Check Point Security Management writes "Great DDoS protection, high availability, and useful firewall rule implementation". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Group-IB Threat Intelligence writes "Easy to setup, highly stable and scalable and efficiently tracks threat actors and analyze their tactics". Check Point Security Management is most compared with Wazuh, Fortinet FortiAnalyzer, IBM Security QRadar, LogRhythm SIEM and Splunk Cloud Platform, whereas Group-IB Threat Intelligence is most compared with Recorded Future, Kaspersky Threat Intelligence Services, CrowdStrike Falcon, Mandiant Advantage and Anomali ThreatStream. See our Check Point Security Management vs. Group-IB Threat Intelligence report.
See our list of best Threat Intelligence Platforms vendors.
We monitor all Threat Intelligence Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.