CA Server Automation vs IBM Tivoli Provisioning Manager [EOL] comparison

Broadcom and IBM are both solutions in the Cluster Provisioning category. Broadcom is ranked #6, while IBM is ranked #3. Broadcom holds a 5.3% mindshare in CP, compared to IBM’s 25.0% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Broadcom users are willing to recommend the solution.

CA Server Automation

Read 1 CA Server Automation review

86 Views
46 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

IBM Tivoli Provisioning Man...

212 Views
25 Comparison Views

CA Server Automation

IBM Tivoli Provisioning Man...

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

CA Server Automation

Ranking in Cluster Provisioning

6th

Average Rating

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

IBM Tivoli Provisioning Man...

Ranking in Cluster Provisioning

3rd

Average Rating

0.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Cluster Provisioning category, the mindshare of CA Server Automation is 5.3%, down from 17.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of IBM Tivoli Provisioning Manager [EOL] is 25.0%, up from 5.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Cluster Provisioning Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
IBM Tivoli Provisioning Manager	25.0%
CA Server Automation	5.3%
Other	69.7%

Cluster Provisioning

Featured Reviews

Sapana Patil

IT Consultant at a computer software company with 5,001-10,000 employees

A quick input response and useful real-time logs but reports require manual scripting

Our company uses the solution to batch schedule movements from one server to another for our customers. We currently have 1,000 jobs being performed by the solution such as getting services, transferring and migrating files, and generating reports. The option to run jobs manually or…

Read full review

Use IBM Tivoli Provisioning Manager [EOL]?

Share your opinion

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cluster Provisioning solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,985 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparisons

No data available

AutoSys Workload Automation vs IBM Tivoli Provisioning Manager [EOL]

Compared 47% of the time

NVIDIA Base Command Manager vs IBM Tivoli Provisioning Manager [EOL]

Compared 29% of the time

Control-M vs IBM Tivoli Provisioning Manager [EOL]

Compared 25% of the time

More IBM Tivoli Provisioning Manager [EOL] Competitors

Also Known As

Server Automation

Tivoli Provisioning Manager

Overview

CA Server Automation is an integrated solution that automates provisioning, patching, and configuration of operating systems, storage resources and application components across physical, virtual and public cloud systems.

This comprehensive solution integrates and automates provisioning processes, standardizes configurations, and simplifies workflows to successfully manage the complexity of continuously changing virtualized environments.

Accelerate application deployment
Streamline service provisioning
Improve server utilization
Build elasticity and improve operational efficiency

Broadcom

Tivoli Provisioning Manager helps organizations optimize efficiency, accuracy and service delivery by automating best practices for data center provisioning activities.

IBM

Sample Customers

HCL Technologies, Logicalis, UOLDIVEO

KPJ Healthcare Berhad, Keyword, Tennis Australia, Cxense ASA, SKIData AG, Unisys, Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd, RAVInvest, Odin, Chapman University, CloudHesive, Cima Solutions Group, Projetech, Grow Strategy

See our list of best Cluster Provisioning vendors.

We monitor all Cluster Provisioning reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.