Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

C3M Cloud Control [EOL] vs Threat Stack Cloud Security Platform [EOL] comparison

CyberArk and F5 are both solutions in the Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) category. Additionally, 100% of CyberArk users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 88% of F5 users who would recommend it.
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 10, 2025

Threat Stack Cloud Security Platform [EOL] and C3M Cloud Control [EOL] are competing in cloud security solutions. Threat Stack has the upper hand in security features, while C3M leads in compliance features.

Features: Threat Stack is known for real-time threat detection, infrastructure monitoring, and alerting features. C3M provides policy management, compliance automation, and offers comprehensive governance and auditing.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Threat Stack provides rapid implementation with proactive customer support. C3M offers seamless integration with comprehensive documentation and reliable support during deployment.

Pricing and ROI: Threat Stack involves a notable setup cost but offers efficient threat detection translating into substantial ROI. C3M's competitive pricing and compliance focus lead to significant cost savings over time with a notable ROI.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) Report (Updated: July 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM)
July 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 865,295 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

C3M Cloud Control [EOL]
Average Rating
10.0
Reviews Sentiment
8.4
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Threat Stack Cloud Security...
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
8
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Featured Reviews

BRUNO REYNAUD - PeerSpot reviewer
Reduces analysts workload, highly reliable, and scales well
We utilize C3M Cloud Control solely for demonstration purposes as there are limited cloud-based assets to work with. Our aim is to showcase to customers how they can reduce unnecessary permissions in their cloud environment The remediation capability of C3M Cloud Control is its most valuable…
Read full review
SC
SecOps program for us, as a smaller company, is amazing; they know what to look for
They could give a few more insights into security groups and recommendations on how to be more effective. That's getting more into the AWS environment, specifically. I'm not sure if that's Threat Stack's plan or not, but I would like them to help us be efficient about how we're setting up security groups. They could recommend separation of VPCs and the like - really dig into our architecture. I haven't seen a whole lot of that and I think that's something that, right off the bat, could have made us smarter. Even as part of the SecOps Program, that could be helpful; a quick analysis. They're analyzing our whole infrastructure and saying, "You have one VPC and that doesn't make a lot of sense, that should be multiple VPCs and here's why." The architecture of the servers in whatever cloud-hosting provider you're on could be helpful. Other than that, they should continue to expand on their notifications and on what's a vulnerability. They do a great job of that and we want them to continue to do that. It would be cool, since the agent is already deployed and they know about the server, they know the IP address, and they know what vulnerability is there, for them to test the vulnerability and see if they can actually exploit it. Or, once we patch it, they could double-check that it can't be. I don't know how hard that would be to build. Thinking on it off the top off my head, it could be a little challenging but it could also be highly interesting. It would also be great if we could test a couple of other features like hammering a server with 100 login attempts and see what happens. Real test scenarios could be really helpful. That is probably more something close to what they do with the SOC 2 audit or the report. But more visualization of that, being able to test things out on our infrastructure to make sure we can or can't hit this box could be interesting.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The remediation capability of C3M Cloud Control is its most valuable feature as it significantly reduces the workload for analysts, saving them a considerable amount of time."
"We haven't had an issue with stability so far."
"With Threat Stack, we quickly identified some AWS accounts which had services that would potentially be exposed and were able to remediate them prior to release of products."
"It is scalable. It deploys easily with curl and yum."
"The number-one feature is the monitoring of interactive sessions on our Linux machines. We run an immutable environment, so that nothing is allowed to be changed in production... We're constantly monitoring to make sure that no one is violating that. Threat Stack is what allows us to do that."
"Every other security tool we've looked is good at containers, or at Kubernetes, is good at AWS, or at instance monitoring. But nobody is good at tying all of those things together, and that's really where Threat Stack shines."
"Technical support is very helpful."
"We're using it on container to see when activity involving executables happens, and that's great."
"It has been quite helpful to have the daily alerts coming to my email, as well as the Sev 1 Alerts... We just went through a SOX audit and those were pivotal."
"The rules are really great. They give us more visibility and control over what's being triggered. There's a large set of rules that come out-of-the-box. We can customize them and we can create our own rules based on the traffic patterns that we see."
More Threat Stack Cloud Security Platform [EOL] pros
 

Cons

"C3M Cloud Control could improve by adding features to support infrastructure instead of only trying to solve identities in the cloud."
"From our perspective, at this point, we need something called risk scoring as you get a lot of alerts, and sometimes you don't know which one's really going to cost if you don't take care of it. We need to understand, at a glance, which items are priorities."
"I would like further support of Windows endpoint agents or the introduction of support for Windows endpoint agents."
"They could give a few more insights into security groups and recommendations on how to be more effective. That's getting more into the AWS environment, specifically. I'm not sure if that's Threat Stack's plan or not, but I would like them to help us be efficient about how we're setting up security groups. They could recommend separation of VPCs and the like - really dig into our architecture. I haven't seen a whole lot of that and I think that's something that, right off the bat, could have made us smarter."
"The compliance and governance need improvement."
"The reports aren't very good. We've automated the report generation via the API and replaced almost all the reports that they generate for us using API calls instead."
"The solution’s ability to consume alerts and data in third-party tools (via APIs and export into S3 buckets) is moderate. They have some work to do in that area... The API does not mimic the features of the UI as far as reporting and pulling data out go. There's a big discrepancy there."
"The one thing that we know they're working on, but we don't have through the tool, is the application layer. As we move to a serverless environment, with AWS Fargate or direct Lambda, that's where Threat Stack does not have the capacity to provide feed. Those are areas that it's blind to now..."
"Some features do not work as expected."
"The user interface can be a little bit clunky at times... There's a lot of information that needs to be waded through, and the UI just isn't great."
More Threat Stack Cloud Security Platform [EOL] cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I rate the support of C3M Cloud Control an eight out of ten."
"We find the licensing and pricing very easy to understand and a good value for the services provided."
"It is a cost-effective choice versus other solutions on the market."
"Pricing seems to be in line with the market structure. It's fine."
"What we're paying now is somewhere around $15 to $20 per agent per month, if I recall correctly. The other cost we have is SecOps."
"I'm happy with the amount that we spend for the product that we get and the overall service that we get. It's not cheap, but I'm still happy with the spend."
"It came in cheaper than Trend Micro when we purchased it a few years ago."
"It is very expensive compared to some other products. The pricing is definitely high."
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
865,295 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Manufacturing Company
13%
Performing Arts
13%
University
10%
Comms Service Provider
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Comparisons

Wiz vs C3M Cloud Control [EOL] Logo
Wiz vs C3M Cloud Control [EOL]
Compared 100% of the time
More C3M Cloud Control [EOL] Competitors
Microsoft Defender for Cloud Apps vs Threat Stack Cloud Security Platform [EOL] Logo
Microsoft Defender for Cloud Apps vs Threat Stack Cloud Security Platform [EOL]
Compared 20% of the time
BMC Helix Cloud Security vs Threat Stack Cloud Security Platform [EOL] Logo
BMC Helix Cloud Security vs Threat Stack Cloud Security Platform [EOL]
Compared 20% of the time
Netskope vs Threat Stack Cloud Security Platform [EOL] Logo
Netskope vs Threat Stack Cloud Security Platform [EOL]
Compared 15% of the time
Cisco IOS Security vs Threat Stack Cloud Security Platform [EOL] Logo
Cisco IOS Security vs Threat Stack Cloud Security Platform [EOL]
Compared 13% of the time
Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP vs Threat Stack Cloud Security Platform [EOL] Logo
Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP vs Threat Stack Cloud Security Platform [EOL]
Compared 12% of the time
More Threat Stack Cloud Security Platform [EOL] Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM)
July 2025
C3M Cloud Control [EOL] reportDownload C3M Cloud Control [EOL] product report
Buyer's Guide
Threat Stack Cloud Security Platform [EOL]
July 2025
Threat Stack Cloud Security Platform [EOL] reportDownload Threat Stack Cloud Security Platform [EOL] product report
 

Also Known As

No data available
Threat Stack, CSP,
 

Overview

C3M Cloud Control is a 100% API based Cloud Security Posture Management and Compliance Assurance platform that offers an enterprise complete cloud control through actionable cloud security intelligence across your AWS, GCP, and Azure infrastructure.

CyberArk

Threat Stack Cloud Security Platform [EOL] offers robust security features including endpoint monitoring, rule customization, and integration capabilities, with easy connectivity to cloud services like Docker and AWS.

Threat Stack Cloud Security Platform [EOL] provides tools for enhancing security visibility across cloud infrastructure. It supports AWS and Docker integration, facilitating efficient threat detection and management. Users appreciate its capability to configure customizable alerts and monitor endpoints, sessions, API interactions, and cloud services. However, there are areas needing improvement, such as better serverless environment support and reduced alert frequency. The platform services smaller organizations by compensating for limited security resources with its comprehensive monitoring and auditing tools.

What are the key features?
  • Easy Cloud Service Integration: Streamlined connectivity with Docker and AWS for efficient monitoring.
  • Customizable Rule Sets: Tailor security rules to meet specific organizational needs.
  • Email Alerts: Receive timely notifications about security events and threats.
  • Interactive Session Monitoring: Track live sessions for suspicious activities.
  • API Integration: Connect effortlessly with third-party tools for an enhanced security posture.
  • SecOps Support: Assistance for organizations lacking dedicated security teams.
What are the benefits and ROI features?
  • Streamlined Threat Detection: Effective process monitoring to identify potential threats.
  • Cost Efficiency: Serves companies with limited resources by providing essential security functions.
  • Comprehensive Audits: Helps in regular examinations of cloud infrastructure, enhancing compliance.
  • Visibility into Cloud Operations: Offers a detailed dashboard for threat visibility and monthly vulnerability assessments.

In specific industries, Threat Stack Cloud Security Platform [EOL] is utilized for its strength in monitoring cloud infrastructure and preventing unauthorized access. Organizations in fields where cloud operations are critical use it for regular audits and monitoring. Its capabilities in threat management are leveraged to maintain secure operations and compliance, especially where there is no dedicated security team.

F5
 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
StatusPage.io, Walkbase, Spanning, DNAnexus, Jobcase, Nextcapital, Smartling, Veracode, 6sense
Buyer's Guide
Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM)
July 2025
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Wiz, Palo Alto Networks, SentinelOne and others in Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM). Updated: July 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
865,295 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our list of best Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.