Broadcom Payment Security vs IdentityMind comparison

Broadcom and Acuant are both solutions in the Fraud Detection and Prevention category. Broadcom is ranked #25, while Acuant is ranked #58. Broadcom holds a 1.2% mindshare in FDP, compared to Acuant’s 0.4% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Broadcom users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Acuant users who would recommend it.

Broadcom Payment Security

Read 16 Broadcom Payment Security reviews

556 Views
545 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

IdentityMind

Read 2 IdentityMind reviews

229 Views
229 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Broadcom Payment Security

IdentityMind

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 12, 2024

Broadcom Payment Security and IdentityMind are competing products in the payment security and digital identity verification sectors. IdentityMind seems superior due to its robust features and flexible customization options.

Features: Broadcom Payment Security offers fraud detection, data encryption, and comprehensive enterprise coverage. IdentityMind provides digital identity verification, user-centric transaction monitoring, and extensive customization options.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Broadcom Payment Security has a straightforward deployment model suitable for established IT infrastructures, with responsive customer support. IdentityMind offers a cloud-based model for quicker implementation and integration, though its customer service is less proactive.

Pricing and ROI: Broadcom Payment Security has a higher initial setup cost with significant long-term ROI, catering to large enterprises. IdentityMind offers a cost-effective entry point with satisfactory ROI, ideal for smaller businesses seeking advanced features.

To learn more, read our detailed Broadcom Payment Security vs. IdentityMind Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Broadcom Payment Security vs. IdentityMind

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 885,311 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Broadcom Payment Security

Ranking in Fraud Detection and Prevention

25th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

IdentityMind

Ranking in Fraud Detection and Prevention

58th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Fraud Detection and Prevention category, the mindshare of Broadcom Payment Security is 1.2%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of IdentityMind is 0.4%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Fraud Detection and Prevention Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Broadcom Payment Security	1.2%
IdentityMind	0.4%
Other	98.4%

Fraud Detection and Prevention

Featured Reviews

Jan-Bas Pietersen

Consultant Fraud Risk Management at a financial services firm with 501-1,000 employees

We are using the product for 3D Secure authentication and fraud prevention

For CA Risk Analytics, we would like to have some statistics available, to do some counting on the number of transactions for example. Also, to have the ability not only for 3D Secure, but accross all online channels. Online banking and App. Because then you would have three online channels. You would have the same device data, so you can combine it. So then you would have an online banking platform, an app, and 3D Secure all from one supplier. This supplier would support all of our authentication methods across those three channels. That's our ultimate goal to have one supplier to support all three online channels.

Read full review

reviewer1471437

Sr. Fraud Analyst at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

Scalable with good security checks and a nice automation process

The solution has some good plug-ins. We use one that is able to scan ID when it is provided and sends it to Mitek which was integrated with the solution. The plugin was able to review and identify the ID within minutes and provides us with a short report to let us know if the ID is valid or not. It's quite a useful add-on. The security aspect is pretty good. There were about seven or eight parameters that were tested. For example, whether the solution would actually match the ID format and if what was reported appeared genuine. It was a good security aspect we used on an ongoing basis that we've found useful. It was something good to have available for existing merchants. It allowed the to review items for risk on top of sanction screening. The automated checks are excellent. There is a network of links to various individuals that we've found useful as well. It allowed us to check against false positives or to further investigate an issue is someone denies a fact or detail. The UI is new and updated and is improved from the older versions.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I think for us, the value that we get out of CA is their effective scheme diagnostics."

"Helped reduce 3-D Secure losses to one of the lowest in the industry while having minimal customer impact."

"The technical support team is professional and attentive to our needs and concerns."

"Let's put it this way, it's like going from Larder to a Ferrari."

"The service works as described, the Admin console is very good along with customer service, and the management support, which is excellent."

"We see a high value in that, with all the fraud rules that we built, we have a very good false positive ratio because of the big data that CA has."

"I use this product to extract cases from there and then send it to Ops to review and analyze."

"For us, it enables the bank or the issuer to offer their customers protection on their online transactions."

More Broadcom Payment Security pros

"The solution automated the processes, which helped the organization immensely."

"The automated checks are excellent."

"In terms of account creation and account blockage and all of that stuff, it works really, really well and it's a very mature solution at this time."

"They have a very wide variety of rules that allow you to integrate well."

Cons

"This solution can improve around the challenge rates and the failures."

"That's the one complaint we have had is the lack of mobile signal."

"There have been service outages/incidents and work has to be chased, for completion or comment."

"This is the one area where there's room for improvement. I think that is the one area where improvements can be made in terms of speed of response, in terms of quality of response, and in terms of more so a proactive problem monitoring."

"Their response time was amazing, but it took a lot of time and the responses that we got were not really satisfactory, so it took a lot of time and alterations to get something fixed, which should have been fixed much earlier."

"In the first two years, there were several issues with stability."

"I had wish it would be this one, this authentication for fingerprint and face would be promising."

"Probably having more flexibility and working on usability and how we use the solution."

More Broadcom Payment Security cons

"The integration between the management of transactions and the management of account creation is quite low."

"The user interface at first felt like it wasn't the easiest to interact with."

"Some of the language around rules and integration can certainly be improved."

"The UI at first felt like it wasn't the easiest interface to interact with."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Utilize the transaction pricing model versus the active cards because the ability to monitor active cards hasn’t been good."

"The SaaS model that we pay is what I know the cost for, and it's reasonable. It's about just under $1,000 or something per month. There is a certain number of users that you get free."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Fraud Detection and Prevention solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

885,311 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	1
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	12

No data available

Comparisons

Broadcom EMV 3-D Secure (3DS) vs Broadcom Payment Security

Compared 69% of the time

ThreatMetrix vs Broadcom Payment Security

Compared 31% of the time

More Broadcom Payment Security Competitors

No data available

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Broadcom Payment Security

March 2026

Download Broadcom Payment Security product report

Buyer's Guide

Fraud Detection and Prevention

March 2026

Download IdentityMind product report

Also Known As

CA Risk Analytics, CA Transaction Manager, CA Payment Security Suite

No data available

Overview

Find the balance. Payment Security delivers more secure online transactions with an excellent customer experience.

Card-not-present (CNP) fraud costs billions of dollars annually across the globe. Issuers, processors and merchants need new applications to fight back with security that doesn’t get in the way of business.

Broadcom has the answer. With our industry-leading authentication solutions, you benefit from:

The largest global consortium network of real-time transaction data
Patented predictive neural network models for highly accurate, real-time decision-making
Unsurpassed leadership in EMV 3-D Secure

You maintain full control over your authentication strategy, fraud systems and policies. Simply said, our solutions help you lower your costs and accelerate your business success.

Broadcom

The balance between best experience and least fraud is tough to find. Too much risk means fraud and chargebacks that can hurt your bottomline. Too much security means fewer customers and more unhappy customers. What’s the balance for the best online fraud detection? Knowing who’s on the other end of the transaction is the best start, and IdentityMind helps you get there.

IdentityMind lets you see who’s on the other end of the transaction so you can identify the good guys you want to do business with and the bad guys that you want to avoid. And, using digital identities powered by eDNA™ technology, you can get a more accurate picture of risk to enable better customer selection and fewer rejections of good customers. eDNA leverages machine learning to build trusted digital identities and analyze identities for the most accurate reputation score (risk profile) possible. Our algorithms provide reputations for each entity tailored for the industry in which you do business. And, we enable you to modify your risk process on the fly, adding in additional checks where merited.

Acuant

Sample Customers

Eurocard

Veem, Mercari, Fundbx, Binance, Huobi, Mezu, Montual

Buyer's Guide

Broadcom Payment Security vs. IdentityMind

March 2026

Free Report: Broadcom Payment Security vs. IdentityMind

Find out what your peers are saying about Broadcom Payment Security vs. IdentityMind and other solutions. Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

885,311 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Broadcom Payment Security vs. IdentityMind report.

See our list of best Fraud Detection and Prevention vendors.

We monitor all Fraud Detection and Prevention reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.