Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Broadcom Payment Security vs IdentityMind comparison

Broadcom and Acuant are both solutions in the Fraud Detection and Prevention category. Broadcom is ranked #31, while Acuant is ranked #56. Broadcom holds a 0.6% mindshare in FDP, compared to Acuant’s 0.1% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Broadcom users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Acuant users who would recommend it.
Broadcom Payment Security
Read 16 Broadcom Payment Security reviews
  • 192 Views
  • 103 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
IdentityMind
Read 2 IdentityMind reviews
  • 64 Views
  • 14 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 12, 2024

Broadcom Payment Security and IdentityMind are competing products in the payment security and digital identity verification sectors. IdentityMind seems superior due to its robust features and flexible customization options.

Features: Broadcom Payment Security offers fraud detection, data encryption, and comprehensive enterprise coverage. IdentityMind provides digital identity verification, user-centric transaction monitoring, and extensive customization options.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Broadcom Payment Security has a straightforward deployment model suitable for established IT infrastructures, with responsive customer support. IdentityMind offers a cloud-based model for quicker implementation and integration, though its customer service is less proactive.

Pricing and ROI: Broadcom Payment Security has a higher initial setup cost with significant long-term ROI, catering to large enterprises. IdentityMind offers a cost-effective entry point with satisfactory ROI, ideal for smaller businesses seeking advanced features.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Broadcom Payment Security vs. IdentityMind Report (Updated: April 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Broadcom Payment Security vs. IdentityMind
April 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 851,371 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Broadcom Payment Security
Ranking in Fraud Detection and Prevention
31st
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.4
Number of Reviews
16
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
IdentityMind
Ranking in Fraud Detection and Prevention
56th
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.7
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Fraud Detection and Prevention category, the mindshare of Broadcom Payment Security is 0.6%, down from 1.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of IdentityMind is 0.1%, down from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Fraud Detection and Prevention
 

Featured Reviews

it_user432621 - PeerSpot reviewer
Versatility in rule variables allows for customization and optimization.
All 3DS systems assess the risks of all transactions, including closed cards. This drives additional workload for operations. Having said that, CA’s partnership with several authorization providers, such as TSYS, will help us to eradicate this issue. These 3DS secure systems act independently from a bank’s man authorisation system ( Falcon, TSYS, SAS Raptor etc), and as a result they end up in position where they end up attempting to authenticate transactions that are closed card as they have no visibility of these type of statuses. This essentially means that these fraud system generate alerts on closed card , wasting operational resource. This is the same for all systems in this space inc RSA. Having said that there have been recent developments in this space that have allowed authorisation platform to work together with the 3DS system via an API. Meaning that the 3DS system can pass the data to the Authorisation system who in turn will make the decision, instead of the decision being made via a 3DS platform. One example of this is the TSYS/CA relationship.
Read full review
DB
Great third-party integrations, very stable and easy to set up
Some of the language around rules and integration can certainly be improved. Account creation rules and account creation flows were very helpful to me and very easy to understand, however, the management of transactions on the platform is not very good. The integration between the management of transactions and the management of account creation is quite low. I would love it if they could combine the two and make it a little bit more robust. Mostly the challenge that I faced is some of the limiting rules or some of the fraud-related checks or preventive measures that we were taking, if we could take that on the account creation side, the transaction side, it would not carry over. We would have to redo the same thing there. The number of rooms on the transaction side was fewer. What I want is deeper and better integration between a transaction and an actual account that's been created today. Let's say that I opened the details for the transaction to figure out something about it. The transaction is coming from a different geography. I want to know what's going on with it. If I could do that, I would ideally like to know who is doing the transaction without separately having to go and find this account through email search or whatever. Linkage between the two is pretty low and rules as well are not very integrated between the two. In terms of AML and transaction management use cases, they do aggregate transactions. For example, let's say over a period of one month I do five transactions. Their backend system knows how many transactions I've done, yet they don't expose that to me on the user's side. I cannot see that and report it. I have to do a calculation. If I'm the user, as in I'm the company that's using it, I have to run calculations on my side to figure out how much transaction has gone through.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"For us, it enables the bank or the issuer to offer their customers protection on their online transactions."
"The service works as described, the Admin console is very good along with customer service, and"
"I use this product to extract cases from there and then send it to Ops to review and analyze."
"I think for us, the value that we get out of CA is their effective scheme diagnostics."
"In terms of the fraud that we see on the card site, card not present fraud, the person gives contribution to what the total fraud has increased substantially."
"The automated checks are excellent."
"They have a very wide variety of rules that allow you to integrate well."
 

Cons

"The service is improving with the implementation of 3D Secure 2.0."
"Probably having more flexibility and working on usability and how we use the solution."
"I had wish it would be this one, this authentication for fingerprint and face would be promising."
"I think improvements for us, it's making it simple enough that anybody can understand how it works."
"This solution can improve around the challenge rates and the failures."
"The UI at first felt like it wasn't the easiest interface to interact with."
"Some of the language around rules and integration can certainly be improved."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Utilize the transaction pricing model versus the active cards because the ability to monitor active cards hasn’t been good."
"The SaaS model that we pay is what I know the cost for, and it's reasonable. It's about just under $1,000 or something per month. There is a certain number of users that you get free."
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Fraud Detection and Prevention solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
851,371 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Comparisons

Broadcom EMV 3-D Secure (3DS) vs Broadcom Payment Security Logo
Broadcom EMV 3-D Secure (3DS) vs Broadcom Payment Security
Compared 100% of the time
More Broadcom Payment Security Competitors
No data available
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Broadcom Payment Security
May 2025
Broadcom Payment Security reportDownload Broadcom Payment Security product report
Buyer's Guide
Fraud Detection and Prevention
April 2025
IdentityMind reportDownload IdentityMind product report
 

Also Known As

CA Risk Analytics, CA Transaction Manager, CA Payment Security Suite
No data available
 

Overview

Find the balance. Payment Security delivers more secure online transactions with an excellent customer experience.

Card-not-present (CNP) fraud costs billions of dollars annually across the globe. Issuers, processors and merchants need new applications to fight back with security that doesn’t get in the way of business.

Broadcom has the answer. With our industry-leading authentication solutions, you benefit from:

  • The largest global consortium network of real-time transaction data
  • Patented predictive neural network models for highly accurate, real-time decision-making
  • Unsurpassed leadership in EMV 3-D Secure

You maintain full control over your authentication strategy, fraud systems and policies. Simply said, our solutions help you lower your costs and accelerate your business success.

Broadcom

The balance between best experience and least fraud is tough to find. Too much risk means fraud and chargebacks that can hurt your bottomline. Too much security means fewer customers and more unhappy customers. What’s the balance for the best online fraud detection? Knowing who’s on the other end of the transaction is the best start, and IdentityMind helps you get there.

IdentityMind lets you see who’s on the other end of the transaction so you can identify the good guys you want to do business with and the bad guys that you want to avoid. And, using digital identities powered by eDNA™ technology, you can get a more accurate picture of risk to enable better customer selection and fewer rejections of good customers. eDNA leverages machine learning to build trusted digital identities and analyze identities for the most accurate reputation score (risk profile) possible. Our algorithms provide reputations for each entity tailored for the industry in which you do business. And, we enable you to modify your risk process on the fly, adding in additional checks where merited.

Acuant
 

Sample Customers

Eurocard
Veem, Mercari, Fundbx, Binance, Huobi, Mezu, Montual
Buyer's Guide
Broadcom Payment Security vs. IdentityMind
April 2025
Free Report: Broadcom Payment Security vs. IdentityMind
Find out what your peers are saying about Broadcom Payment Security vs. IdentityMind and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
851,371 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Broadcom Payment Security vs. IdentityMind report.
See our list of best Fraud Detection and Prevention vendors.

We monitor all Fraud Detection and Prevention reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.