Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Boomi iPaaS vs Flowgear comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 17, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Boomi iPaaS
Ranking in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)
6th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.3
Number of Reviews
29
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Flowgear
Ranking in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)
24th
Average Rating
9.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.9
Number of Reviews
7
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) category, the mindshare of Boomi iPaaS is 11.6%, up from 7.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Flowgear is 0.3%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)
 

Featured Reviews

Eugene Paden - PeerSpot reviewer
Integration solution proves maturity and drives productivity
There are many features we're using. We're starting to do AI now regarding integration with other platforms, focusing on creating integrations. A significant area for improvement is version control. Currently, you develop and cannot properly roll back to a previous version unless you create different versions. With proper version control, you could know which version to revert to and test other versions.
Fulufhelo Sibei - PeerSpot reviewer
Fast support, good data ingestion, and a nice UI
I am happy with the product. It has solved our business challenges. It is easy to integrate into multiple sources. We did have to use a data transformation tool which would take months to map and transform data that was being dumped into our secure file transfer. Previously, by the time we finished ingesting the data, it was no longer relevant. This has since changed. Therefore, there are no areas needed for improvement.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"It is easy to learn and implement."
"The product's integration features are quite rich and low code. It is easy to use."
"The tool's most valuable features I've found are related to debugging and testing. It makes it easy to track execution, documents, and process history. This functionality is particularly useful for identifying issues with data and providing insights to the business."
"Boomi iPaaS has substantially reduced operational costs by providing out-of-the-box connectors that expedite the integration process with enterprise systems."
"The platform is user-friendly."
"AtomSphere Integration will suit those looking for small automation and simple integrations."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is its monitoring part to debug certain issues and find problems."
"The best features are that it is a cloud-based and a multi-tenant tool."
"The solution has increased efficiency and productivity and saved us time and money."
"Well-managed version control of workflows and the simplicity in promoting workflows through each environment has aided my team in developing workflows for various environments without the risk of losing development work."
"Being able to seamlessly make changes to how one can do mapping visually without having to be a seasoned developer is great."
"The no-code visual front end, along with pre-built samples, allows someone with very little technical ability to get an integration up and running."
"Great for data flow."
"It has improved our integration with our data supplier."
"The Flowgear tool is helping us reduce the manual work that is done."
 

Cons

"They should create a custom connector option. With this, they could improve where the user can create the connector, based on their usage."
"There is no validation in the mapping profile custom scripting, such as IntelliSense or advanced error checking."
"In my experience, I haven't encountered any major issues with the tool. However, there could be a learning curve for new users, especially depending on which tool you're using. For example, I've used MuleSoft in the past, which is more code-oriented and requires knowledge of Java. Transitioning to Boomi AtomSphere Integration took me a couple of months because of differences in terminology."
"They need to introduce more configurable functions to remove scripting or coding. Scripting should be minimized. It should have exhaustive functions. Currently, it lacks in this aspect."
"There are stability issues."
"The product's UI could be more convenient."
"There are very few string handling functions and few mathematical functions are available."
"Boomi AtomSphere Integration is not yet exposed to the world as a good product owing to certain shortcomings in the area of marketing where improvements are required."
"The software itself needs to keep up with the daily demand to service all clients as the need arises."
"Currently, when designing and testing larger workflows, the sessions timeout and re-authentications are frequently required."
"The UI could be improved."
"The initial setup was a bit complex as we were new."
"The product needs to improve the self-help tools and samples."
"The product would be nice if it could provide the deployment features in the lower packages."
"We would like to see more learning videos for beginners."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"When it comes to pricing, it's not so much about being less expensive as it is about how they don't tie to the hardware on the underlined VMware that you run on, as other vendors do"
"This solution is very economical (based on the connections)."
"The cost of the solution is in the neighborhood of $20,000 annually. There are no costs above the standard licensing fee."
"Approximately 20k annually."
"The licensing model of Dell Boomi is based on a ‘pay-per-use’ model."
"There could be an easy-to-understand licensing model."
"It is an expensive platform."
"I rate the product's price an eight on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive."
Information not available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) solutions are best for your needs.
865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
15%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Financial Services Firm
8%
Non Profit
6%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Boomi AtomSphere Integration?
The tool's most valuable features I've found are related to debugging and testing. It makes it easy to track execution, documents, and process history. This functionality is particularly useful for...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Boomi AtomSphere Integration?
The pricing for Boomi iPaaS is reasonable, costing around $6,000 per year. It is affordable even for small customers, like a salon with a couple of branches.
What needs improvement with Boomi AtomSphere Integration?
Boomi iPaaS needs better source control. It is not as good as it could be in terms of managing versions and running what-if scenarios.
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Also Known As

Boomi
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

DocuSign Inc., Innotas, Certent, Renesas Electronics America (REA), Kelly-Moore Paints, Mindjet, City of McKinney, Ritchie Bros. Auctioneers (RBA), Daylight Transport, A10 Networks
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Boomi iPaaS vs. Flowgear and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.
865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.