Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Boomi iPaaS vs Flowgear comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 17, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Boomi iPaaS
Ranking in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)
4th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.3
Number of Reviews
29
Ranking in other categories
Business Orchestration and Automation Technologies (16th), AI Observability (14th)
Flowgear
Ranking in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)
29th
Average Rating
9.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.9
Number of Reviews
7
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2025, in the Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) category, the mindshare of Boomi iPaaS is 9.8%, up from 8.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Flowgear is 0.7%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Boomi iPaaS9.8%
Flowgear0.7%
Other89.5%
Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)
 

Featured Reviews

Eugene Paden - PeerSpot reviewer
CTO at a computer software company with 201-500 employees
Integration solution proves maturity and drives productivity
There are many features we're using. We're starting to do AI now regarding integration with other platforms, focusing on creating integrations. A significant area for improvement is version control. Currently, you develop and cannot properly roll back to a previous version unless you create different versions. With proper version control, you could know which version to revert to and test other versions.
Fulufhelo Sibei - PeerSpot reviewer
DevOps Engineer at Astute - The Financial Services Exchange
Fast support, good data ingestion, and a nice UI
I am happy with the product. It has solved our business challenges. It is easy to integrate into multiple sources. We did have to use a data transformation tool which would take months to map and transform data that was being dumped into our secure file transfer. Previously, by the time we finished ingesting the data, it was no longer relevant. This has since changed. Therefore, there are no areas needed for improvement.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"It is a low-code and high-configuration platform, which is very valuable. Develop once and run anywhere is another useful feature. It also has connectors for more than 200 applications. It provides value for money. Our customers who have implemented this solution have a very high ROI."
"The tool's most valuable features I've found are related to debugging and testing. It makes it easy to track execution, documents, and process history. This functionality is particularly useful for identifying issues with data and providing insights to the business."
"The product's initial setup phase was easy."
"Very effective with its drag-and-drop feature."
"The platform is user-friendly."
"I really appreciate the on-the-go access through the browser and the B2B integration."
"Low-code development is the most valuable feature."
"The iPaaS functionality is very mature. The browser based IDE is also very mature and stable."
"Well-managed version control of workflows and the simplicity in promoting workflows through each environment has aided my team in developing workflows for various environments without the risk of losing development work."
"Great for data flow."
"It has improved our integration with our data supplier."
"The Flowgear tool is helping us reduce the manual work that is done."
"Being able to seamlessly make changes to how one can do mapping visually without having to be a seasoned developer is great."
"The solution has increased efficiency and productivity and saved us time and money."
"The no-code visual front end, along with pre-built samples, allows someone with very little technical ability to get an integration up and running."
 

Cons

"They are lacking in some streaming features, and messaging features from a listener's point of view."
"There are very few string handling functions and few mathematical functions are available."
"The most valuable features of Boomi are the integration capabilities, the Data Hub product, and the UDI integration."
"They should create a custom connector option. With this, they could improve where the user can create the connector, based on their usage."
"There are more mature (dedicated) API management and master data management (MDM) solutions available in the market."
"They need to introduce more configurable functions to remove scripting or coding. Scripting should be minimized. It should have exhaustive functions. Currently, it lacks in this aspect."
"Lots of enhancements are needed in the API portal so that the developers can view the definitions, try out the APIs, etc."
"Documentation could be improved."
"The UI could be improved."
"We would like to see more learning videos for beginners."
"Currently, when designing and testing larger workflows, the sessions timeout and re-authentications are frequently required."
"The product would be nice if it could provide the deployment features in the lower packages."
"The initial setup was a bit complex as we were new."
"The product needs to improve the self-help tools and samples."
"The software itself needs to keep up with the daily demand to service all clients as the need arises."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing is not reasonable at all. It's very high."
"AtomSphere Integration's pricing is competitive, and I would rate it seven out of ten."
"There could be an easy-to-understand licensing model."
"They do not charge by the number of people using the software (client-server model), but rather they charge based on the number of connections used. This makes it very cost effective."
"I rate the product's price an eight on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive."
"Boomi AtomSphere Integration is expensive. I rate its pricing an eight out of ten."
"Approximately 20k annually."
"It is an expensive platform."
Information not available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) solutions are best for your needs.
879,310 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
12%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Financial Services Firm
8%
Government
5%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business9
Midsize Enterprise4
Large Enterprise15
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business7
Large Enterprise1
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Boomi AtomSphere Integration?
The tool's most valuable features I've found are related to debugging and testing. It makes it easy to track execution, documents, and process history. This functionality is particularly useful for...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Boomi AtomSphere Integration?
The pricing for Boomi iPaaS is reasonable, costing around $6,000 per year. It is affordable even for small customers, like a salon with a couple of branches.
What needs improvement with Boomi AtomSphere Integration?
Boomi iPaaS needs better source control. It is not as good as it could be in terms of managing versions and running what-if scenarios.
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Also Known As

Boomi
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

DocuSign Inc., Innotas, Certent, Renesas Electronics America (REA), Kelly-Moore Paints, Mindjet, City of McKinney, Ritchie Bros. Auctioneers (RBA), Daylight Transport, A10 Networks
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Boomi iPaaS vs. Flowgear and other solutions. Updated: November 2025.
879,310 professionals have used our research since 2012.