BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management vs Sysdig Monitor comparison

BMC and Sysdig are both solutions in the Cloud Monitoring Software category. BMC is ranked #45, while Sysdig is ranked #34 with an average rating of 8.0. BMC holds a 0.3% mindshare in CMS, compared to Sysdig’s 0.3% mindshare. Additionally, 80% of BMC users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 75% of Sysdig users who would recommend it.

BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management

Read 5 BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management reviews

476 Views
195 Comparison Views

80% willing to recommend

Sysdig Monitor

Read 3 Sysdig Monitor reviews

612 Views
184 Comparison Views

75% willing to recommend

BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management

Sysdig Monitor

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 18, 2024

Sysdig Monitor and BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management are competing in cloud services management and monitoring. Sysdig Monitor holds an edge in pricing and support, whereas BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management offers a stronger feature set for comprehensive solutions.

Features: Sysdig Monitor provides deep visibility into containers and Kubernetes, precise monitoring, and cloud-native security insights. BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management features advanced orchestration, lifecycle automation, and multi-cloud governance controls.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Sysdig Monitor offers straightforward deployment for Kubernetes with responsive support. BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management's deployment is more complex due to its expansive suite but is complemented by effective customer service.

Pricing and ROI: Sysdig Monitor presents more attractive initial setup costs and a quick ROI, suited for budget-conscious organizations. BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management requires a higher initial investment but justifies it with a promising ROI for enterprises demanding extensive cloud service management.

To learn more, read our detailed BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management vs. Sysdig Monitor Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management vs. Sysdig Monitor

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 865,384 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management

Ranking in Cloud Monitoring Software

45th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

5.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Management (38th)

Sysdig Monitor

Ranking in Cloud Monitoring Software

34th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Container Monitoring (9th), Cloud-Native Application Protection Platforms (CNAPP) (20th)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Cloud Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management is 0.3%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Sysdig Monitor is 0.3%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Cloud Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

Entprssol67

Enterprise Solution Architect at Engineering Ingegneria Informatica SPA

Helps design blueprints in a cloud environment but the support is a major problem

One of the major problems is that support is not so good. I used to have a support expert in Spain but they left two years ago. BMC doesn't invest a lot in network automation but network automation is a major point in CLM. There aren't any experts here in Europe, maybe they have in America, I don't know. The main problem is the support in Europe. We had a lot of problems with the people who got put on our cases. The agents that we were assigned to were not so capable. They wanted to replicate the problem. If you have an incident, it takes a lot of time to troubleshoot the problem. The incident support is not so good. The technicians don't know the platform well. BMC doesn't want to invest in CLM. Two years ago we had a lot of problems. Maybe BMC realized that CLM is an end of life product.

Read full review

Md. Olid Hasan Bhuiyan

Site Reliability Engineer at ReliSource

Provides a good view of the sequence and offers in-depth visibility into my infrastructure

I needed to identify the sequence and frequency of system calls for a specific system. Sysdig provided this information readily. However, analyzing frequency proved more challenging. As far as I know, Sysdig Monitor lacks functionality to directly obtain system call frequency for certain files. Therefore, I had to capture a screenshot of the relevant data from Sysdig Monitor and then manually extract the text. A built-in Sysdig feature to retrieve system call frequency for specific website actions would greatly enhance its usefulness. I had difficulty installing Sysdig Monitor on Windows.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"By allowing end users to request their own services, the request process for systems is much quicker and more accurate."

"CLM has a multi-cloud portal because they have the resources to implement in various environments in various ports."

"Assesses change impact or completes an audit using multiple dashboard views."

"Supports unattended installs and image-based, script-based, or template-based provisioning."

"Automates Java EE Application Deployment from an SCM system."

"Integrates role-based access control with pre-configured policies for CIS, DISA, HIPAA, PCI, SOX, NIST, and SCAP documentation and remediation."

"You can tie together your public and private cloud infrastructure into a "single pane of glass"."

"Sysdig Monitor impressed me with its in-depth visibility into my infrastructure."

"The ability to stop/pause and capture logs when something happens is the most valuable feature."

"Docker containers are completely supported, kind of like "first class citizens"."

Cons

"The installation and configuration can be tricky due to it being built on Remedy."

"Needs integrations with other providers to provide a custom public cloud environment."

"One of the major problems is that support is not so good."

"It is needs to automate the actions to take when an alert is triggered."

""Events" reporting (errors, crashes, etc.) is not clear at all in a Mesos environment (i.e., it's not clear what specific container is the one that went down). In a Docker Compose environment, it may be way better."

"I had difficulty installing Sysdig Monitor on Windows."

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"Sysdig Monitor is not expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Financial Services Firm

16%

Computer Software Company

13%

Manufacturing Company

Outsourcing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Sysdig Monitor?

Sysdig Monitor is not expensive.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Sysdig Monitor?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Sysdig Monitor?

During my undergraduate studies, I investigated how the frequency or order of actions within a specific system triggered events on our website. To achieve this, I effectively used Sysdig Monitor to...

See all answers

Comparisons

CloudBolt vs BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management

Compared 42% of the time

Pandora FMS vs BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management

Compared 33% of the time

Amazon CloudWatch vs BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management

Compared 24% of the time

More BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management Competitors

Microsoft Defender for Cloud vs Sysdig Monitor

Compared 18% of the time

Sysdig Secure vs Sysdig Monitor

Compared 15% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security vs Sysdig Monitor

Compared 15% of the time

Datadog vs Sysdig Monitor

Compared 13% of the time

Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks vs Sysdig Monitor

Compared 12% of the time

More Sysdig Monitor Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cloud Management

July 2025

Download BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management product report

Buyer's Guide

Container Monitoring

July 2025

Download Sysdig Monitor product report

Also Known As

BMC CLM

No data available

Overview

BMC's cloud management platform drives digital innovation with agile, full-stack service provisioning across cloud and traditional platforms. BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management scales easily while integrating with essential compliance and governance policies to reduce risk.

BMC

Sysdig Monitor allows you to maximize the performance and availability of your cloud infrastructure, services, and applications. Built on open source, it provides immediate, deep visibility into rapidly changing container environments. You can resolve issues faster by using granular data derived from actual system calls enriched with cloud and Kubernetes context along with Prometheus metrics. Remove silos by unifying data across teams for hybrid and multi-cloud monitoring.

Sysdig

Sample Customers

JDA Software, Morningstar, Orange Business Services, Wipro

SAP Concur, Goldman Sachs, Worldpay by FIS, Cisco, Experian, Home Office, Societe Generale, Sunrun. More here: https://sysdig.com/customers/

Buyer's Guide

BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management vs. Sysdig Monitor

July 2025

Free Report: BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management vs. Sysdig Monitor

Find out what your peers are saying about BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management vs. Sysdig Monitor and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management vs. Sysdig Monitor report.

See our list of best Cloud Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.