Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

BlueJeans Meetings [EOL] vs LifeSize comparison

Verizon and Enghouse Video are both solutions in the Virtual Meetings category. Verizon is ranked #14 with an average rating of 9.0, while Enghouse Video is ranked #31. Verizon holds a 0.8% mindshare in VM, compared to Enghouse Video’s 0.4% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Verizon users are willing to recommend the solution.
BlueJeans Meetings [EOL]
Read 4 BlueJeans Meetings [EOL] reviews
  • 180 Views
  • 176 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
LifeSize
Read 1 LifeSize review
  • 122 Views
  • 122 Comparison Views
0% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 28, 2025

LifeSize and BlueJeans Meetings [EOL] compete in the video conferencing industry. LifeSize shows strength in pricing and customer support, while BlueJeans Meetings [EOL] stands out in feature set richness.

Features:LifeSize is focused on providing HD video conferencing, seamless device integration, and user-friendly setup, making it suitable for high-quality virtual meetings. BlueJeans Meetings [EOL] offers advanced meeting analytics, strong interoperability with multiple systems, and a comprehensive feature set, making it ideal for larger, feature-driven organizations.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service:LifeSize provides a straightforward plug-and-play installation and responsive customer service for quick technical issue resolution. BlueJeans Meetings [EOL] offers a flexible cloud-based deployment, automatic updates, and extensive support, which although requiring more initial resources, ensures effective troubleshooting.

Pricing and ROI:LifeSize offers competitive pricing, providing a good return on investment for small to medium-sized businesses due to lower setup costs and efficient long-term usage benefits. BlueJeans Meetings [EOL], with its higher pricing, delivers significant ROI to large enterprises because its comprehensive features justify the initial investment with long-term benefits.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Virtual Meetings Report (Updated: August 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Virtual Meetings
August 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 866,300 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

BlueJeans Meetings [EOL]
Ranking in Virtual Meetings
14th
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.9
Number of Reviews
4
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
LifeSize
Ranking in Virtual Meetings
31st
Average Rating
5.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Virtual Meetings category, the mindshare of BlueJeans Meetings [EOL] is 0.8%, down from 0.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of LifeSize is 0.4%, down from 0.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Virtual Meetings Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
BlueJeans Meetings0.8%
LifeSize0.4%
Other98.8%
Virtual Meetings
 

Featured Reviews

Saurabh Srivastav - PeerSpot reviewer
Accommodates large meetings with up to 500 participants, and I find it pretty intuitive and user-friendly
As per company policy, most internal meetings happen through Google Meet, but for large-scale meetings with more than 500 participants, we use BlueJeans Meetings. It's more like a broadcast meeting platform, which Google Meet doesn't allow The main advantage is the ability to host large meetings…
Read full review
it_user1320285 - PeerSpot reviewer
Good video conferencing but it needs to support third-party hardware
We are using Lifesize for video conferencing and virtual meetings The most valuable feature is video conferencing. This solution needs better platform integration with third-parties such as Microsoft and Cisco. It needs support for third-party hardware as opposed to only Lifesize-branded…
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The main advantage is the ability to host large meetings with up to 500 participants. The sound quality is also better on BlueJeans. I find it pretty intuitive and user-friendly."
"The quality of both audio and video is good."
"It is available in all flavors. You can use it in the browser, and you can use it on an Android phone for which a BlueJeans app is available. I use an Android phone, so I only know about Android. So, you can join a meeting from the application installed on your phone or from the mobile browser, or you can use it from a laptop or a PC."
"It is really easy and there are no complicated graphics or icons. It is simple and has an intuitive design. It's user-friendly over anything else I have used."
"The most valuable feature is video conferencing."
 

Cons

"Screen sharing is available but there is no feature for remote access, to take control of another machine."
"BlueJeans doesn't allow as much customization of your background in a video call, so that could be improved."
"I haven't had any big challenges. The annotation feature should be improved. So if I need to mark something or point something out, it's there, but it's not that user friendly. Other than that it's fine. In terms of collaboration, I think there could be some improvement."
"Its cost is very high. If you sell it in India, which is a price-conscious market, the prices should be as per the market competition. You cannot charge the rates that are applicable in the US. They should tailor it to the local market. It should be in line with what the competition is offering."
"This solution needs better platform integration with third-parties such as Microsoft and Cisco."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I once tried buying it for myself, but it was very costly. It is quite expensive as compared to other solutions. With BlueJeans, there are carrier charges if you call the toll-free number. The customer doesn't pay for the call, but the buyer or the subscriber of BlueJeans has to pay for it. That is where BlueJeans becomes very costly, and that is where Google, Microsoft Teams, and Zoom are very helpful because you don't have to pay these charges."
Information not available
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Virtual Meetings solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
866,300 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about BlueJeans Meetings?
The main advantage is the ability to host large meetings with up to 500 participants. The sound quality is also better on BlueJeans. I find it pretty intuitive and user-friendly.
See all answers
What needs improvement with BlueJeans Meetings?
In future releases, I would like to see maybe customized virtual backgrounds, like Google Meet has. BlueJeans doesn't allow as much customization of your background in a video call, so that could b...
See all answers
What advice do you have for others considering BlueJeans Meetings?
Overall, I would rate the solution a nine out of ten. I would recommend using it.
See all answers
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Comparisons

Skype for Business vs BlueJeans Meetings [EOL] Logo
Skype for Business vs BlueJeans Meetings [EOL]
Compared 100% of the time
More BlueJeans Meetings [EOL] Competitors
Cisco TelePresence vs LifeSize Logo
Cisco TelePresence vs LifeSize
Compared 100% of the time
More LifeSize Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Virtual Meetings
August 2025
BlueJeans Meetings [EOL] reportDownload BlueJeans Meetings [EOL] product report
Buyer's Guide
Virtual Meetings
August 2025
LifeSize reportDownload LifeSize product report
 

Also Known As

BlueJeans Network
LifeSize
 

Overview

BlueJeans Meetings [EOL] offered a versatile conferencing experience for businesses, featuring seamless integration and advanced capabilities for professional communication.

BlueJeans Meetings [EOL] was known for enhancing virtual collaboration. It enabled companies to conduct efficient meetings with robust support for audio, video, and content sharing. Benefiting from extensive compatibility across platforms, it was adaptable to different technological setups within enterprises.

What are the key features of BlueJeans Meetings [EOL]?
  • Cross-Platform Compatibility: Accessible on various devices ensuring flexibility.
  • HD Video and Audio: Provides crisp and clear conferencing quality.
  • Content Sharing: Facilitates easy sharing of documents and presentations.
  • Integration: Seamlessly connects with tools like Microsoft Teams and Slack.
What should users consider in reviews for ROI?
  • Enhanced Productivity: Simplifies meeting setups and participation.
  • Cost-Efficiency: Streamlined communication reducing travel expenses.
  • Reliable Security: Provides secure communication channels.
  • Customer Support: Access to responsive and helpful technical assistance.

In industries such as healthcare and education, BlueJeans Meetings [EOL] was instrumental in supporting remote consultations and virtual classrooms. It promoted effective engagement between professionals and clients, highlighting its adaptability to diverse professional requirements.

Verizon

HD video conferencing platform that is simple to deploy, making instant face-to-face collaboration possible with anyone, anywhere.

Enghouse Video
 

Sample Customers

Criteo, Seattle Children's Hospital, The Wharton School, Wikia, Telit, Epilepsy, NENW, IPENZ, Medanta, Mphasis, Royal Academy of Dance, Wharton, Red Hat, HKS Architects, Forum of the Future, Commonfund
Barrow County School System, ActiVision, BBVA, BWB, Bateman, eBay, Epson, Gevers, FannieMae, GlaxoSmithKline, Jones & Walker, KKR, RAF Museum Cosford
Buyer's Guide
Virtual Meetings
August 2025
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Zoom Video Communications, Cisco, Microsoft and others in Virtual Meetings. Updated: August 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
866,300 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our list of best Virtual Meetings vendors.

We monitor all Virtual Meetings reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.