We performed a comparison between Backupify Google Workspace Backup and Quorum OnQ based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Cloud Backup solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable features are the ease of use and the fact that users themselves can self-provision and recover."
"The most valuable feature is the interface, which is very nice to work with."
"The change in the way that Quorum processes data has made a tremendous improvement in backup and replication times. While the familiar interface remains, the underpinnings have been finely tuned and the speed is incredible. My large Exchange Server went from 5- to 6-hour backups down to 22 minutes."
"Quorum OnQ has taken the guesswork out of backup/recovery and disaster recovery."
"I have used the BMR (Bare Metal Restore) in several emergencies and it has absolutely saved my bacon."
"From a disaster-recovery point of view, one of the things I really like is that I can test the virtual copy of the physical server on a test network and compare the servers side-by-side, without interfering with the production network. So I can see and make sure that the latest copy of the server is the physical copy of the server, without interfering with production."
"It does automated tests to the systems to make sure that you could spin them up if you needed to. And if something doesn't come back up in those tests, we get a notification saying the system didn't come back up."
"It is a stable solution."
"It is a very scalable solution."
"The most valuable feature of Quorum OnQ is quick recovery."
"Not a ten because there's always room for improvement."
"The device does not allow you to do multiple backups over the whole environment."
"They need integration with other platforms."
"We found that some of the live SQL databases we were backing up would be inconsistent when we would restore them."
"Better integration with cloud-based solutions like Azure and Office 365 is needed."
"There seems to be a lack of technicians. Sometimes they are very busy and I don't hear back for a day or two. The technicians they have are great. They are fantastic, but it seems difficult, at times, to get in contact with anyone."
"I don't love the scheduler, as I think that interface could use an overhaul."
"The price of Quorum OnQ could be improved. We were exploring the product in terms of having a partnership with the distributor so that we could operate as a service, but for our own use, within the company, we couldn't justify the price unless the servers would become an option later on. The upfront cost of purchasing a license for the hardware is quite steep."
"The user interface needs to be improved."
"At times the email notifications don't go out, but a quick reset always fixes that problem."
More Backupify Google Workspace Backup Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
Backupify Google Workspace Backup is ranked 48th in Cloud Backup while Quorum OnQ is ranked 26th in Cloud Backup with 21 reviews. Backupify Google Workspace Backup is rated 9.0, while Quorum OnQ is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Backupify Google Workspace Backup writes "Inexpensive, easy to configure, good support, and it is easy to scale up when needed". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Quorum OnQ writes "Took us just hours to do a complete server restore, with minimal downtime". Backupify Google Workspace Backup is most compared with Veeam Backup & Replication, Druva inSync, Datto SaaS Protection, Hornetsecurity 365 Total Backup and Commvault Cloud, whereas Quorum OnQ is most compared with Veeam Backup & Replication, Cohesity DataProtect, Acronis Cyber Protect and N-able Cove Data Protection. See our Backupify Google Workspace Backup vs. Quorum OnQ report.
See our list of best Cloud Backup vendors.
We monitor all Cloud Backup reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
