Aurea CX Messenger vs TIBCO FTL comparison

Aurea and TIBCO are both solutions in the Message Oriented Middleware (MOM) category. Aurea is ranked #8, while TIBCO is ranked #7. Aurea holds a 4.4% mindshare in MOM, compared to TIBCO’s 6.5% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Aurea users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of TIBCO users who would recommend it.

Aurea CX Messenger

Read 7 Aurea CX Messenger reviews

831 Views
283 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

TIBCO FTL

Read 1 TIBCO FTL review

303 Views
303 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Aurea CX Messenger

TIBCO FTL

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Aurea CX Messenger and TIBCO FTL based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Solace, Amazon Web Services (AWS) and others in Message Oriented Middleware (MOM).

To learn more, read our detailed Message Oriented Middleware (MOM) Report (Updated: August 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Message Oriented Middleware (MOM)

August 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 867,349 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Aurea CX Messenger

Ranking in Message Oriented Middleware (MOM)

8th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business Activity Monitoring (4th), Message Queue (MQ) Software (12th), Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) (14th), SOA Governance (4th)

TIBCO FTL

Ranking in Message Oriented Middleware (MOM)

7th

Average Rating

9.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2025, in the Message Oriented Middleware (MOM) category, the mindshare of Aurea CX Messenger is 4.4%, up from 2.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of TIBCO FTL is 6.5%, up from 6.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Message Oriented Middleware (MOM) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
TIBCO FTL	6.5%
Aurea CX Messenger	4.4%
Other	89.1%

Message Oriented Middleware (MOM)

Featured Reviews

Radhey Rajput

Sr. IT Analyst at NCR Corporation

Lightweight and efficient solution

It's very good and lightweight. But, it does not provide web service communication. But it is excellent for internal connections One valuable feature is the messaging broker. If there is a disruption, it restores the messages. And when the application is running, it delivers all the messages. The…

Read full review

reviewer963342

Senior Architect

Static and dynamic TCP have been the most useful

It's an ESB for both server-side as well as with eFTL, we are exposing messages to clients over web/mobile From the current direct socket architecture, we moved to an FTL based messaging layer which allowed us to not worry about individual functions but work on a single message/framework.…

Read full review

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Message Oriented Middleware (MOM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

867,349 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

11%

Insurance Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Media Company

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	1
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	5

No data available

Comparisons

Oracle SOA Suite vs Aurea CX Messenger

Compared 29% of the time

TIBCO eFTL vs Aurea CX Messenger

Compared 29% of the time

ActiveMQ vs Aurea CX Messenger

Compared 25% of the time

IBM MQ vs Aurea CX Messenger

Compared 18% of the time

More Aurea CX Messenger Competitors

TIBCO eFTL vs TIBCO FTL

Compared 37% of the time

TIBCO Enterprise Message Service vs TIBCO FTL

Compared 33% of the time

TIBCO Rendezvous vs TIBCO FTL

Compared 31% of the time

More TIBCO FTL Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Business Activity Monitoring

September 2025

Download Aurea CX Messenger product report

Buyer's Guide

Message Oriented Middleware (MOM)

August 2025

Download TIBCO FTL product report

Also Known As

CX Messenger Enterprise, Aurea Sonic ESB, Aurea Sonic, Aurea Sonic MQ

No data available

Overview

CX Messenger lets your technology keep pace with your business. Aurea’s industry leading Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) lets you adapt and change your infrastructure with plug-and-play speed and ease.

Aurea

TIBCO FTL connects with TIBCO eFTL, TIBCO Enterprise Message Service, TIBCO Messaging, Apache Kafka Distribution and TIBCO Messaging, Eclipse Mosquitto Distribution providing one platform to address all inter-application communication needs and receive data from IoT devices via MQTT and publish into Kafka streams. It caters a centralized monitoring and management streamlines an administrator's job. Other features including InfluxDB historical statistics and Grafana dashboards make for maintenance and downtime. TIBCO FTL is cloud-ready with Docker images provided for deployment in the PaaS of your choice for your applications development. It's optimized to leverage the latest advancements in hardware and networking technologies such as 10GbE, RDMA, 40Gb Infiniband and OFED and it uses a content-based filtering for data distribution.

TIBCO

Sample Customers

Heathrow, HomeServe, Paypal, Freedom Mortgage

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Message Oriented Middleware (MOM)

August 2025

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Solace, Amazon Web Services (AWS) and others in Message Oriented Middleware (MOM). Updated: August 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

867,349 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Message Oriented Middleware (MOM) vendors.

We monitor all Message Oriented Middleware (MOM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.