Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Amazon Q vs Claude comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Amazon Q
Ranking in AI Code Assistants
7th
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
2.2
Number of Reviews
11
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Claude
Ranking in AI Code Assistants
6th
Average Rating
0.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.2
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
AI-Powered Chatbots (22nd), AI Writing Tools (8th), Large Language Models (LLMs) (6th), AI Proofreading Tools (8th)
 

Featured Reviews

Ayush Harsh - PeerSpot reviewer
This platform significantly boosts productivity with its powerful development context understanding and seamless AWS integration
I particularly appreciate that Amazon Q offers fast and context-aware responses because it understands the development context and provides relevant answers that save time. The AWS integration is excellent, as smooth interaction with AWS services makes it easy to manage cloud tasks directly from the IDE. The code suggestions provide intelligent recommendations and explanations, reducing debugging time and helping me write cleaner code. I appreciate the ability to ask questions in plain English and get technical responses without needing to search through documentation. Amazon Q developer scales efficiently in terms of usage across different project sizes, teams, and workloads, as it works effectively for solo developers and has the potential for larger teams, especially when integrated into shared AWS environments. It supports multiple languages and frameworks, scaling across various stacks, ensuring consistent performance by maintaining responsiveness even in large code bases or complex AWS architectures.
reviewer2203806 - PeerSpot reviewer
AI generates human-like responses and automates tasks efficiently
The product could be improved by offering automatic integration with other solutions, such as the ability to read Excel or text files and automate processes this way. Currently, additional solutions are needed to integrate these types of tools. If I want to read a spreadsheet from Google and pose a human-like question, I need to integrate two or three AI solutions. Security is also a concern. AI solutions currently lack security in their processing. If I need to access my confidential information and the AI solution accesses and displays it in responses for everyone, it is not the ideal scenario. Developing solutions to ensure security is crucial, although it is not their main objective at the moment.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The explanation and documentation capabilities are excellent."
"The best feature of Amazon Q is the voice chat, where it talks back to you in normal language and you can query it."
"Amazon Q saved my time more than other products, such as GitHub Copilot, because it is conscious about particular AWS services."
"The benefits of Amazon Q are that you don't need to build any code base at the backend to develop your RAG system or AI LLM-based summarization systems to do question-answer sets on the documents."
"The best feature of Amazon Q is that it has knowledge of my entire code base, entire repository, and its flows."
"Overall, I rate Claude nine out of ten."
 

Cons

"I discovered that the application logs me out automatically after some time, which becomes problematic as I then lose access to my chat history."
"The model is not able to give answers properly with the traffic it is facing, so it needs to be scaled more."
"Even though we connected with the support team of AWS, they were not able to resolve our issue, so we were disappointed at that moment."
"While great for standard tasks, it sometimes struggles with more complex or multi-layered problems in large code bases."
"Sometimes feedback is needed immediately. It takes a bit of time because there is a workload."
"The product could be improved by offering automatic integration with other solutions, such as the ability to read Excel or text files and automate processes this way."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which AI Code Assistants solutions are best for your needs.
864,155 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
17%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Comms Service Provider
6%
Computer Software Company
13%
University
8%
Comms Service Provider
8%
Manufacturing Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Claude?
The pricing is standard for the markets. It is not a monthly price, but a bucket with dollars for usage. If I make too many queries, I consume more of my budget on the platform.
What needs improvement with Claude?
The product could be improved by offering automatic integration with other solutions, such as the ability to read Excel or text files and automate processes this way. Currently, additional solution...
What is your primary use case for Claude?
I primarily work on creating labs and testing cases. I generate agents for specific topics. If I want to develop an application, I use a specific prompt and utilize it as an agent to address a spec...
 

Comparisons

 

Overview

Find out what your peers are saying about GitHub, Google, Cursor and others in AI Code Assistants. Updated: July 2025.
864,155 professionals have used our research since 2012.