Amazon Neptune vs Redis comparison

Amazon Web Services (AWS) and RedisLabs are both solutions in the Managed NoSQL Databases category. Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #7 with an average rating of 8.5, while RedisLabs is ranked #9 with an average rating of 8.7. Amazon Web Services (AWS) holds a 7.9% mindshare in MND, compared to RedisLabs’s 2.8% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of RedisLabs users who would recommend it.

Amazon Neptune

Read 4 Amazon Neptune reviews

811 Views
811 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Redis

Read 23 Redis reviews

4,801 Views
96 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Amazon Neptune

Redis

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 11, 2025

Amazon Neptune and Redis are competing in the database category, with Redis often preferred for its high-speed features despite Amazon Neptune's comprehensive capabilities.

Features: Amazon Neptune is designed for handling complex queries using a graph-based model, supporting both property graphs and RDF triple stores. Redis, in contrast, focuses on speed, offering quick data retrieval and a variety of data structures such as strings, hashes, and sets. While Neptune supports robust graph processing, Redis's simplicity, speed, and memory-centric operations stand out.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Redis provides a straightforward deployment process favorable in both cloud and on-premises environments, supported by extensive documentation and community resources. Amazon Neptune, primarily cloud-based, integrates well with AWS services but might pose challenges due to its specialized nature. Redis's simpler setup and strong community engagement generally ensure a more efficient support experience.

Pricing and ROI: Amazon Neptune involves higher upfront costs because of its extensive service offerings and dependence on AWS infrastructure, which can lead to increased operational expenses. Redis, benefitting from open-source flexibility, offers a lower-cost entry point attractive for businesses prioritizing cost efficiency. Consequently, while Amazon Neptune can deliver significant returns in complex graph scenarios, Redis is often seen as offering a more favorable ROI given its cost-effective solution for high-speed data applications.

To learn more, read our detailed Managed NoSQL Databases Report (Updated: August 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Managed NoSQL Databases

August 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 867,445 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Amazon Neptune

Ranking in Managed NoSQL Databases

7th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

4.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Redis

Ranking in Managed NoSQL Databases

9th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

5.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

NoSQL Databases (7th), In-Memory Data Store Services (1st), Vector Databases (4th)

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2025, in the Managed NoSQL Databases category, the mindshare of Amazon Neptune is 7.9%, down from 14.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Redis is 2.8%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Managed NoSQL Databases Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Amazon Neptune	7.9%
Redis	2.8%
Other	89.3%

Managed NoSQL Databases

Featured Reviews

Reviewer3028812

Back End Developer at Zeta

Multiple graph models and languages support lead to efficient use, yet community growth brings challenges

The onboarding part and documentation where we could ideally use Amazon Neptune is excellent. Amazon Neptune as a product by AWS is exceptional because it supports multiple graph models such as RDF and property graph. It also has support for multiple querying languages such as Gremlin, SparkQL, and OpenCypher. It is very comprehensive in supporting every requirement we had at Zetta. Amazon Neptune's best features include its multiple servers, each supporting different languages such as OpenCypher, SparkQL, and RDF. For the same RDF graph or property graph, we could use multiple languages to query on different servers. This is exceptional because we have one graph DB with two endpoints exposed where we could interact with different languages on the same graph. Additionally, Amazon has a Sagemaker Jupyter Notebook which interacts with the Amazon Neptune database itself, providing a clean UI for representing nodes since the Jupyter Notebook has predefined graph representation capabilities through queries.

Read full review

Yaseer Arafat

.Net Developer at Freelance

Unmatched Performance and Scalability for Modern Applications

Redis has room for improvement in a few areas. Enhanced tools for managing and monitoring clusters would be beneficial, as would built-in security mechanisms like advanced encryption and granular access controls. Simplifying setup and configuration could make Redis more accessible to new users. Introducing more enterprise-grade features, such as better multi-tenancy support and improved backup and restore capabilities, would also be advantageous. For the next release, it would be great to see enhanced cluster management tools, native multi-region supports for better data redundancy, integrated analytics for deeper insights, AI and ML integration features, and improved developer experience through enhanced SDKs and tools.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Amazon Neptune as a product by AWS is exceptional because it supports multiple graph models such as RDF and property graph, and it also has support for multiple querying languages such as Gremlin, SparkQL, and OpenCypher, making it very comprehensive in supporting every requirement we had at Zetta."

"Relational databases are never good at identifying patterns in graphs or other similar relationships, whereas Amazon Neptune is."

"The initial setup is actually simple."

"Redis has multiple valuable features such as being a free and reliable open-source tool."

"I find Redis valuable primarily for its caching capabilities, particularly in handling cache requests effectively. Its simplicity in managing key-value pairs for caching is one of its strengths, making it a preferred choice over more complex databases like MongoDB for specific use cases. However, I haven't explored Redis extensively for managing complex data structures beyond caching, as MongoDB might be more suitable for such scenarios."

"The product offers fast access to my database."

"The most valuable features of Redis are its ease of use and speed. It does not have access to the disc and it is fast."

"Redis is a simple service that does what it promises."

"What I like best about Redis is its fast and easy use. It has interesting algorithms like HyperLogLog and provides useful features. It's also good for implementing scalable rate limiting."

"The online interface is very fast and easy to use."

"I use Redis mostly to cache repeated data that is required."

More Redis pros

Cons

"Amazon Neptune could improve by spreading more awareness for others to have an understanding of the solution because the technology is fairly new. The developer community and larger community do not understand it yet."

"We had a strict time constraint, and it took many sleepless nights to find information in the documentation."

"In my scenario, the integration wasn't easy because ................in Java."

"Redis should have an option to operate without Docker on a local PC."

"Redis could improve its efficiency in handling locally stored data, not just Amazon Cloud or Google Cloud."

"If we use a lot of data, it will eventually cost us a lot."

"I would prefer it if there was more information available about Redis. That would make it easier for new beginners. Currently, there is a lack of resources."

"For the PubSub feature, we had to create our own tools to monitor the events."

"Redis presents a single point of failure and lacks fault tolerance."

"The tool should improve by increasing its size limits and handling dynamic data better. We use the client ID or associate it with a key for static content. The solution will not be easy for a beginner. Unless you understand SQL data, it will be difficult to understand and use Redis. It also needs to be user-friendly."

"The only thing is the lack of a GUI application. There was a time when we needed to resolve an issue in production. If we had a GUI, it would have been easier."

More Redis cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Microsoft Azure and Amazon AWS are on par for pricing and Google has been raising its prices."

"We saw an ROI. It made the processing of our transactions faster."

"Redis is not an overpriced solution."

"The tool is open-source. There are no additional costs."

"Redis is an open-source product."

"Redis is an open-source solution. There are not any hidden fees."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Managed NoSQL Databases solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

867,445 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

19%

Computer Software Company

16%

Construction Company

University

Financial Services Firm

24%

Computer Software Company

13%

Educational Organization

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	11
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	8

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Amazon Neptune?

When taken as part of the whole AWS contract, it was cheaper, but as a single service, Neptune was more expensive compared to Neo4j.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Amazon Neptune?

Some improvements could be made by introducing a UI that would clearly show the vertices and connections, which would make it easier to visualize and debug. Additionally, the need for downtime duri...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Amazon Neptune?

So, I'm not using it currently, but when I was working with my last organization, which was a gaming company, we used Amazon Neptune for real-time fraud detection. We maintained user data, mobile d...

See all answers

What do you like most about Redis?

Redis is better tested and is used by large companies. I haven't found a direct alternative to what Redis offers. Plus, there are a lot of support and learning resources available, which help you u...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Redis?

The disadvantage of Redis is that it's a little bit hard to have too many clusters or too many nodes and create the clusters. The sync between the nodes is easier to implement with Couchbase, for e...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Redis?

Redis is used for a part of a booking engine for travel, specifically for the front part to get some sessions and information about the sessions. If a customer or user is using the sites in differe...

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB vs Amazon Neptune

Compared 31% of the time

Neo4j AuraDB vs Amazon Neptune

Compared 29% of the time

Amazon DynamoDB vs Amazon Neptune

Compared 19% of the time

Amazon DocumentDB vs Amazon Neptune

Compared 11% of the time

Amazon Timestream vs Amazon Neptune

Compared 10% of the time

More Amazon Neptune Competitors

Red Hat Data Grid vs Redis

Compared 11% of the time

Oracle Coherence vs Redis

Compared 10% of the time

Chroma vs Redis

Compared 9% of the time

ScyllaDB vs Redis

Compared 6% of the time

Upstash vs Redis

Compared 5% of the time

More Redis Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Amazon Neptune

September 2025

Download Amazon Neptune product report

Buyer's Guide

Redis

August 2025

Download Redis product report

Also Known As

No data available

Redis Enterprise

Overview

Amazon Neptune is a fast, reliable, fully managed graph database service that makes it easy to build and run applications that work with highly connected datasets. The core of Amazon Neptune is a purpose-built, high-performance graph database engine optimized for storing billions of relationships and querying the graph with milliseconds latency. Amazon Neptune supports popular graph models Property Graph and W3C's RDF, and their respective query languages Apache TinkerPop Gremlin and SPARQL, allowing you to easily build queries that efficiently navigate highly connected datasets. Neptune powers graph use cases such as recommendation engines, fraud detection, knowledge graphs, drug discovery, and network security.

Amazon Neptune is highly available, with read replicas, point-in-time recovery, continuous backup to Amazon S3, and replication across Availability Zones. Neptune is secure with support for HTTPS encrypted client connections and encryption at rest. Neptune is fully managed, so you no longer need to worry about database management tasks such as hardware provisioning, software patching, setup, configuration, or backups.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Redis offers high-speed, in-memory storage, renowned for real-time performance. It supports quick data retrieval and is used commonly in applications like analytics and gaming.

Renowned for real-time performance, Redis delivers high-speed in-memory storage, making it a favorite for applications needing quick data retrieval. Its diverse data structures and caching capabilities support a broad array of use cases, including analytics and gaming. Redis ensures robust scalability with master-slave replication and clustering, while its publish/subscribe pattern renders it reliable for event-driven applications. The solution integrates smoothly with existing systems, minimizing performance tuning needs. Although documentation on scalability and security could be improved, Redis remains cost-effective and stable, commonly utilized in cloud environments. Enhancing integration with cloud services like AWS and Google Cloud and refining GUI may improve usability.

What are the key features of Redis?

High Speed: In-memory data storage for swift access.
Scalability: Master-slave replication and clustering for growth.
Data Structures: Supports diverse types for varied uses.
Persistence: RDB snapshots and AOF logs ensure durability.
Integration: Seamless integration reduces tuning efforts.

What should users look for in Redis reviews?

Performance: Real-time data retrieval boosts efficiency.
Cost-Effectiveness: Stable, budget-friendly implementation.
Versatility: Suitable for diverse environments and platforms.
Reliability: Ensures data persistence and high availability.

Redis finds application across industries for tasks like caching to improve application performance and speed, minimizing database load. It enables real-time processing for session storage, push notifications, and analytics. As a messaging platform, Redis handles high traffic and supports replication and clustering for cross-platform scalability.

RedisLabs

Sample Customers

Intuit, Pearson, Samsung, Ignition One, Lifeomic, Blackfynn, Paysense

1. Twitter 2. GitHub 3. StackOverflow 4. Pinterest 5. Snapchat 6. Craigslist 7. Digg 8. Weibo 9. Airbnb 10. Uber 11. Slack 12. Trello 13. Shopify 14. Coursera 15. Medium 16. Twitch 17. Foursquare 18. Meetup 19. Kickstarter 20. Docker 21. Heroku 22. Bitbucket 23. Groupon 24. Flipboard 25. SoundCloud 26. BuzzFeed 27. Disqus 28. The New York Times 29. Walmart 30. Nike 31. Sony 32. Philips

Buyer's Guide

Managed NoSQL Databases

August 2025

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Amazon Web Services (AWS), MongoDB and others in Managed NoSQL Databases. Updated: August 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

867,445 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Managed NoSQL Databases vendors.

We monitor all Managed NoSQL Databases reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.