IBM Guardium Vulnerability Assessment Reviews

Vendor: IBM

3.0 out of 5

4 reviews
66% willing to recommend

What is IBM Guardium Vulnerability Assessment?

IBM Guardium Vulnerability Assessment scans data infrastructures (databases, data warehouses and big data environments) to detect vulnerabilities, and suggests remedial actions. The solution identifies exposures such as missing patches, weak passwords, unauthorized changes and misconfigured privileges.

Get the Vulnerability Management Buyer's Guide and find out what your peers are saying about IBM Guardium Vulnerability Assessment, Microsoft Defender for Cloud, Qualys VMDR and more!

IBM Guardium Vulnerability Assessment is the #49 ranked solution in top Vulnerability Management solutions. PeerSpot users give IBM Guardium Vulnerability Assessment an average rating of 6.0 out of 10. IBM Guardium Vulnerability Assessment is most commonly compared to Microsoft Defender for Cloud: IBM Guardium Vulnerability Assessment vs Microsoft Defender for Cloud. IBM Guardium Vulnerability Assessment is popular among the large enterprise segment, accounting for 77% of users researching this solution on PeerSpot. The top industry researching this solution are professionals from a financial services firm, accounting for 38% of all views.

Buyer's Guide

Vulnerability Management

June 2025

Get the category report

Helped 859,129 peers since 2012

Featured IBM Guardium Vulnerability Assessment reviews

Dr. Sajid Latif

Guardium Administrator at Interactive Group

We use the analytical functionality of Guardium, but the analytical functionality is not so powerful or flexible because it does not include the application user ID. It only includes the database user ID. To identify risky users, it does not support end users, so IBM must incorporate this feature into the built-in analytical engine of the Guardium. There is only one problem I experienced while using Guardium: the internal database of the collector is MySQL, which is not so powerful or flexible. When you make a query in a MySQL database, it takes too much time to respond. IBM should replace this MySQL database with a more powerful internal database for the logging mechanism so that Guardium can collect logging data flexibly and ensure optimization. My overall experience with Guardium is good. The only problem is that IBM must replace the internal DB, MySQL, with a more powerful enterprise-level database because enterprises use it at an enterprise level, and MySQL does not support optimally.

Read full review

reviewer1714710

CTA\Owner at a tech services company with 11-50 employees

We are a full security base integration and application business. We help with implementation and deployments. I used Guardium to help with a cloud migration to check and do some validation for a client's data landscape and services so that they made sure that they were all secure in overall…

Read full review

Olufemi Adalemo

Chief Technology Officer at Leystel Nigeria Limited

The most valuable feature is that it provides a simple English recommendation on actions that you need to take once a vulnerability is discovered. It provides very clear and concise instructions on the steps that you need to take to remediate the vulnerabilities that are found. The performance is good.

Read full review

IBM Guardium Vulnerability Assessment mindshare

As of June 2025, the mindshare of IBM Guardium Vulnerability Assessment in the Vulnerability Management category stands at 0.5%, down from 0.6% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Vulnerability Management

Key learnings from peers

Last updated Jun 25, 2025

Valuable Features

"The Vulnerability Assessment feature is quite stable and helps identify numerous vulnerabilities in databases."
"It helped with some of the regulatory requirements. It also helped with some of the security analytics and analysis. It was worthwhile from that perspective."
"The most valuable feature is that it provides a simple English recommendation on actions that you need to take once a vulnerability is discovered."

Room for Improvement

"There is only one problem I experienced while using Guardium: the internal database of the collector is MySQL, which is not so powerful or flexible."
"It was not as easy to use. The user-friendliness of it was somewhat lower than what I was expecting. It was also lacking in terms of the ease of the setup. There should be an automatic agent for deployment."
"The interface could be improved by having sub-groups of tests, ultimately making the process of collecting tests faster."