Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Threat Hunting Framework vs TruSTAR [EOL] comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 8, 2025

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Threat Hunting Framework
Average Rating
9.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
Threat Intelligence Platforms (39th)
TruSTAR [EOL]
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Featured Reviews

JR
High fidelity cyber incident detection is near in real-time, enabling proactive & timely mitigation efforts
The nature of the system means it has to be implemented throughout the organizations. You need to implement it on the network layer, the email layer, the web proxy layer, and also the endpoints. Nevertheless, endpoint monitoring is very challenging due to the lack of automated method to install the endpoint agents. In one of our customer case, we have about 40,000 endpoints and we need to have a simplified method of deployment if we're going to implement the endpoint monitoring effectively. Product features also need some improvement in creating custom signatures for detection because that is not open to customers.
Use TruSTAR [EOL]?
Share your opinion
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Threat Intelligence Platforms solutions are best for your needs.
867,370 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Overview

Find out what your peers are saying about CrowdStrike, Recorded Future, VirusTotal and others in Threat Intelligence Platforms. Updated: August 2025.
867,370 professionals have used our research since 2012.