No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Riskified vs SHIELD comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Riskified
Ranking in Fraud Detection and Prevention
7th
Average Rating
9.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.4
Number of Reviews
3
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
SHIELD
Ranking in Fraud Detection and Prevention
11th
Average Rating
3.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.4
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2026, in the Fraud Detection and Prevention category, the mindshare of Riskified is 3.6%, down from 5.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SHIELD is 1.4%, down from 1.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Fraud Detection and Prevention Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Riskified3.6%
SHIELD1.4%
Other95.0%
Fraud Detection and Prevention
 

Featured Reviews

JJ
Operations Manager at Wanderlust
Integrates well, reasonably priced, and the technical support is helpful
The most valuable features of this solution are the scoring and the yes, or no function. I am satisfied with the documentation it provides. It integrates well with other products The user interface could be more intuitive. I have been familiar with Riskified for three years. Riskified is a…
reviewer2561490 - PeerSpot reviewer
Head of Innovation at a tech vendor with 51-200 employees
Effective fraud prevention but expensive
We are using SHIELD as the end user for our gaming platform to prevent fraud with our gamers Earlier, there were multiple instances of security issues, like fraud where users were playing with each other and using multiple accounts to redeem cashbacks. Fraud prevention has helped us reduce these…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Riskified's KPIs are probably the highest in the industry."
"I think that it is a great partnership if you are looking for reliable fraud prevention for your company."
"The scoring mechanism is good."
"Our clients have definitely avoided losing money on multiple occasions due to fraud."
"Our clients have definitely avoided losing money on multiple occasions due to fraud."
"The most valuable features of this solution are the scoring and the yes, or no function."
"We find the device fingerprinting feature valuable."
 

Cons

"The user interface could be more intuitive."
"We didn't have the same consultants Riskified's side throughout the deployment, so we sometimes had to redefine the Business requests."
"The fraud channel is a sensitive spot, so it's always complex."
"I can't think of any issues that we've faced that need to be improved."
"The user interface could be more intuitive."
"The fraud channel is a sensitive spot, so it's always complex."
"It is a costly solution since they charge based on MAU."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is determined by the requirements of each company."
Information not available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Fraud Detection and Prevention solutions are best for your needs.
885,789 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
13%
Retailer
12%
Construction Company
9%
Computer Software Company
8%
Construction Company
11%
Computer Software Company
9%
Comms Service Provider
9%
Financial Services Firm
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SHIELD?
The solution is too expensive. On a scale of one to ten, I would rate it nine or ten in terms of cost.
What needs improvement with SHIELD?
It is a costly solution since they charge based on MAU. We want to optimize the cost for our platform, and the high cost is the only problem we have with SHIELD.
What is your primary use case for SHIELD?
We are using SHIELD as the end user for our gaming platform to prevent fraud with our gamers.
 

Comparisons

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

ALDO, Macy's, Finish Line, Burlington, Burton Group, Sky-tours, GiftCards.com, Kirna Zabête
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about ThreatMetrix, NICE, BioCatch and others in Fraud Detection and Prevention. Updated: March 2026.
885,789 professionals have used our research since 2012.