Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

LogRhythm NetMon vs NETSCOUT vSTREAM comparison

LogRhythm and NETSCOUT are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. LogRhythm is ranked #56 with an average rating of 7.7, while NETSCOUT is ranked #81. LogRhythm holds a 0.3% mindshare in NMS, compared to NETSCOUT’s 0.3% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of LogRhythm users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of NETSCOUT users who would recommend it.
LogRhythm NetMon
Read 11 LogRhythm NetMon reviews
  • 564 Views
  • 266 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
NETSCOUT vSTREAM
Read 3 NETSCOUT vSTREAM reviews
  • 419 Views
  • 213 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 10, 2024

LogRhythm NetMon and NETSCOUT vSTREAM are competing network monitoring solutions. NETSCOUT vSTREAM is often favored due to its comprehensive feature set, making it a preferred choice for users prioritizing capability over cost.

Features: LogRhythm NetMon delivers real-time visibility, effective threat detection capabilities, and an easy-to-use interface for security-focused users. NETSCOUT vSTREAM offers extensive traffic analysis, detailed performance monitoring, and scalability for large network environments.

Room for Improvement: LogRhythm NetMon can enhance traffic analysis depth, improve scalability for very large networks, and expand integration options with third-party tools. NETSCOUT vSTREAM could simplify its deployment process, improve user interface intuitiveness, and offer more cost-effective packages for smaller enterprises.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: LogRhythm NetMon features a straightforward deployment process with robust customer support that facilitates seamless adoption. Conversely, NETSCOUT vSTREAM requires more complex configuration yet benefits from attentive customer service that aids in managing its extensive features.

Pricing and ROI: LogRhythm NetMon is generally available at a lower initial cost, delivering quick return on investment for budget-conscious businesses. NETSCOUT vSTREAM, while demanding a higher upfront investment, potentially justifies its cost through its advanced long-term performance capabilities.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed LogRhythm NetMon vs. NETSCOUT vSTREAM Report (Updated: June 2025).
Buyer's Guide
LogRhythm NetMon vs. NETSCOUT vSTREAM
June 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 859,129 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

LogRhythm NetMon
Ranking in Network Monitoring Software
56th
Average Rating
7.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.7
Number of Reviews
11
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
NETSCOUT vSTREAM
Ranking in Network Monitoring Software
81st
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
3
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of LogRhythm NetMon is 0.3%, down from 0.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of NETSCOUT vSTREAM is 0.3%, down from 0.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Network Monitoring Software
 

Featured Reviews

KeithGalleros - PeerSpot reviewer
A solution providing visibility into all data traversing your network but needs to be more cost-efficient
The main concern is that LogRhythm has not improved NetMon but instead introduced a separate product, which many customers, including us, would prefer to be integrated into a single platform for easier management. I'd also like to see LogRhythm NetMon improve in terms of cost efficiency, especially regarding adding new products that may overlap in functionality. Specifically, I would appreciate enhanced detection and response capabilities directly integrated into NetMon to avoid needing additional rules or tools from LogRhythm. Regarding integration capabilities, I think NetMon's current agent-based approach is limiting. Integrating with protocols like Gflow and Netflow would be better, allowing seamless integration with our existing network equipment. This would solve the problem of agent-based restrictions and improve overall integration.
Read full review
KL
A user-friendly solution that is easy to install and improves visibility
I would like to see improvements made to the user guide. From my personal experience, it is helpful to see a list of steps describing what to do next in different situations. An example is what to do and what to back up in the case of certain types of failure. There are also cases where a customer can't understand specific features. Enhancements to the user guide would be helpful for this. More features for network fragmentation would be helpful.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The analytics feature is the most valuable feature."
"It has a very strong artificial intelligence engine."
"LogRhythm NetMon's most impressive feature is that it's a bundled package, so you're not just relying on monthly data; you get a six-month view for more comprehensive indicators of compromise. This dual approach is precious. We implement LogRhythm NetMon in our cybersecurity strategy mainly for compliance and correlation of network, user, and decision activities, particularly for network firewalls and access control."
"The initial setup is straightforward because we can deploy an open server."
"The protocols with which you see the traffic for a particular website that a client has in their environment, for example, are valuable. We can monitor whether the traffic is up to the mark or whether they need to add more bandwidth. Also, we can see if we're able to get real-time environment data as well. The customization dashboard is really good. LogRhythm NetMon has its own in-built dashboards which are helpful in guiding customization."
"It is a stable solution...It is a scalable solution."
"The most valuable feature is the log, which can be analyzed by our SIEM solution."
"NetMon's best feature is traffic analysis."
More LogRhythm NetMon pros
"One of the valuable features is the packet decoding."
"vSTREAM gives us better visibility and reporting about our network infrastructure, allowing for cost-optimization."
 

Cons

"LogRhythm NetMon's pricing model is an area of concern that should be made a little bit cheaper in comparison to the other players in the market currently."
"The platform's integration features often need to be improved."
"The main concern is that LogRhythm has not improved NetMon but instead introduced a separate product, which many customers, including us, would prefer to be integrated into a single platform for easier management."
"The training for this product is not very good and needs to be improved."
"Sometimes it's hard to find the network devices' self-audit logs."
"Some of the automated tasks we can perform on QRadar cannot be performed on LogRhythm because the solution has limitations."
"I would like to see better integration with multiple products. Integration is not something that is readily available for most of the products."
"Could use a topology diagram which would help get an exact visual."
More LogRhythm NetMon cons
"I would like for it to have a smaller footprint of the virtual appliance and better performance."
"Room for improvement exists in filtering in the packet decode."
"I would like to see improvements made to the user guide."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The product is expensive for smaller companies."
"I don't have visibility into the pricing of LogRhythm NetMon as it's handled through our commercial partnerships."
"Pricing is okay. There were some competitors that were extremely expensive and there were some which were really inexpensive but LogRhythm stayed in the middle of them."
"LogRhythm's licensing part is something that depends on the license you want since they offer it on a perpetual and subscription basis."
"NetMon's licensing costs about $85k per year, with some extra costs for support."
"The price of this solution is too high, so it should be made more practical and more valuable for the customer."
"Licensing is quite expensive."
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
859,129 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
28%
Computer Software Company
19%
Insurance Company
11%
Government
11%
Financial Services Firm
14%
Computer Software Company
13%
Government
12%
Energy/Utilities Company
11%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about LogRhythm NetMon?
It has a very strong artificial intelligence engine.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for LogRhythm NetMon?
I don't have visibility into the pricing of LogRhythm NetMon as it's handled through our commercial partnerships.
See all answers
What needs improvement with LogRhythm NetMon?
The main concern is that LogRhythm has not improved NetMon but instead introduced a separate product, which many customers, including us, would prefer to be integrated into a single platform for ea...
See all answers
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Comparisons

SCOM vs LogRhythm NetMon Logo
SCOM vs LogRhythm NetMon
Compared 31% of the time
PRTG Network Monitor vs LogRhythm NetMon Logo
PRTG Network Monitor vs LogRhythm NetMon
Compared 20% of the time
SolarWinds NPM vs LogRhythm NetMon Logo
SolarWinds NPM vs LogRhythm NetMon
Compared 17% of the time
Niagara Visibility Controller vs LogRhythm NetMon Logo
Niagara Visibility Controller vs LogRhythm NetMon
Compared 17% of the time
Ixia CloudLens vs LogRhythm NetMon Logo
Ixia CloudLens vs LogRhythm NetMon
Compared 15% of the time
More LogRhythm NetMon Competitors
NETSCOUT nGeniusONE vs NETSCOUT vSTREAM Logo
NETSCOUT nGeniusONE vs NETSCOUT vSTREAM
Compared 56% of the time
Arista Data ANalyZer vs NETSCOUT vSTREAM Logo
Arista Data ANalyZer vs NETSCOUT vSTREAM
Compared 44% of the time
More NETSCOUT vSTREAM Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
LogRhythm NetMon
June 2025
LogRhythm NetMon reportDownload LogRhythm NetMon product report
Buyer's Guide
Network Monitoring Software
May 2025
NETSCOUT vSTREAM reportDownload NETSCOUT vSTREAM product report
 

Also Known As

LogRhythm Network Monitor
vSTREAM
 

Overview

Identify Emerging Threats on Your Network in Real Time

Transform your physical or virtual system into a network forensics sensor in a matter of minutes for free with LogRhythm's NetMon Freemium. Your investigations will come together effortlessly with extensive corresponding metadata, full packet capture, and customizable advanced correlation.. Detect network-based threats with real-time network monitoring and big data analytics

Get the visibility you need with NetMon.

LogRhythm

The vSTREAM virtual appliance complements existing Adaptive Session Intelligence (ASI)-based instrumentation to provide the same level of visibility within virtualized and cloud infrastructures that is already possible in physical environments. The vSTREAM virtual appliance is ideal for monitoring service-critical traffic running within virtualized or cloud infrastructures, either locally on a host or as an aggregation point for multiple hosts. With complete visibility across physical, virtual and cloud networks, the vSTREAM virtual appliance presents real-time views of end-to-end call trace data and network-wide KPIs, to protect the reliability and availability of networks and application services.

NETSCOUT
 

Sample Customers

Sera-Brynn
Metropolitan Police Agency, Banpara, PropertyRoom.com
Buyer's Guide
LogRhythm NetMon vs. NETSCOUT vSTREAM
June 2025
Free Report: LogRhythm NetMon vs. NETSCOUT vSTREAM
Find out what your peers are saying about LogRhythm NetMon vs. NETSCOUT vSTREAM and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
859,129 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our LogRhythm NetMon vs. NETSCOUT vSTREAM report.
See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.