"The platform is stable."
"We didn't use customer service often, but my opinion is that they are really good."
"Offensive Security Penetration Testing Services is open source, so it is free and there are no licensing costs."
"I think the Fortinet Penetration Testing could be further improved by making it more robust than what it is now."
"The product needs to enhance the interaction feature in terms of speed. Sometimes, when we need to get a virtual view of websites, the speed of notifications between customers and the site works slowly."
"Offensive Security Penetration Testing Services has a rating system for how exploitable vulnerability is, but that rating system does not really give you any transparency into how the rating for that exploit was reached. It would be useful to see on the back end what data led them to specify that a specific exploit may not be very good or may be great."
More Fortinet Penetration Testing Service Pricing and Cost Advice →
Fortinet Penetration Testing Service is ranked 5th in Penetration Testing Services with 2 reviews while Offensive Security Penetration Testing Services is ranked 7th in Penetration Testing Services with 1 review. Fortinet Penetration Testing Service is rated 8.0, while Offensive Security Penetration Testing Services is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Fortinet Penetration Testing Service writes "Flexible to use product with good technical support services ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Offensive Security Penetration Testing Services writes "Open source and easy to set up". Fortinet Penetration Testing Service is most compared with Cobalt.io, whereas Offensive Security Penetration Testing Services is most compared with Rapid7 Penetration Testing Services and Cobalt.io.
See our list of best Penetration Testing Services vendors.
We monitor all Penetration Testing Services reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
