We performed a comparison between Datto ALTO and IBM Disaster Recovery Services based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Commvault, Nutanix and others in Disaster Recovery as a Service."It stayed the same for a long time, which makes it easy to set up and easy to work with."
"The backup for our virtual machines is reliable and the console makes management straightforward."
"The solution works well for very large organizations. It can scale quite well."
"Disaster Recovery Services is stable."
"Technical support was superior when it was owned independently."
"The process of restoring VMs to the appliance could be more efficient."
"Disaster Recovery Services could provide better value for money."
"The infrastructure level of IBM's recovery systems could be improved."
More IBM Disaster Recovery Services Pricing and Cost Advice →
Datto ALTO is ranked 7th in Disaster Recovery as a Service with 2 reviews while IBM Disaster Recovery Services is ranked 5th in Disaster Recovery as a Service with 2 reviews. Datto ALTO is rated 8.0, while IBM Disaster Recovery Services is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Datto ALTO writes "Offers the flexibility to work with different vendors for cloud services, backup, and platform services". On the other hand, the top reviewer of IBM Disaster Recovery Services writes "Quite stable with good scalability for large organizations but the recovery system infrastructure could be better". Datto ALTO is most compared with Datto SIRIS, whereas IBM Disaster Recovery Services is most compared with Precisely Assure MIMIX, Sungard Disaster Recovery Services and Azure Site Recovery.
See our list of best Disaster Recovery as a Service vendors.
We monitor all Disaster Recovery as a Service reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
