Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

CyCognito vs Tenable Attack Surface Management comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

CyCognito
Ranking in Attack Surface Management (ASM)
12th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) (12th)
Tenable Attack Surface Mana...
Ranking in Attack Surface Management (ASM)
10th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2025, in the Attack Surface Management (ASM) category, the mindshare of CyCognito is 3.5%, up from 2.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Tenable Attack Surface Management is 4.6%, up from 3.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Attack Surface Management (ASM) Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Tenable Attack Surface Management4.6%
CyCognito3.5%
Other91.9%
Attack Surface Management (ASM)
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
14%
Computer Software Company
11%
Government
9%
Retailer
9%
Computer Software Company
12%
Manufacturing Company
12%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Government
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
No data available
Find out what your peers are saying about CrowdStrike, Trend Micro, Qualys and others in Attack Surface Management (ASM). Updated: September 2025.
868,229 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Also Known As

No data available
Tenable.asm
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

UTA, BERTELSMANN, WIPRO
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about CrowdStrike, Trend Micro, Qualys and others in Attack Surface Management (ASM). Updated: September 2025.
868,229 professionals have used our research since 2012.